Re: [Design-team] Beta wallpaper revision

Everyone can imagine how it would look like a shower of sparks without a lighting effect. I like the effect of sparks created by mizmo. 2010/9/14 Máirín Duffy : > Hi Emily, > > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 18:50 -0400, Emily Dirsh wrote: >> I know it's a bit down-to-the-wire, but I (finally! ;)) finished

Re: [Design-team] Beta wallpaper revision

On 09/14/2010 12:27 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 17:18 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: >> Do you think this is something we could use for beta? Or is it the wrong >> direction? >> >> (source is: http://fedorapeople.org/groups/designteam/Resources/Fedora% >> 20Release%20Themes/F14/Wall

Re: [Design-team] Beta wallpaper revision

Dang. I am liking this, despite still not being an active help lately. On 09/13/2010 05:49 PM, Alexander Smirnov wrote: > I love it.� Fantastic colors!!! :) > > 2010/9/14 M�ir�n Duffy > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 17:18 -0400, M�ir�n Duffy wrote: > > Do you

Re: [Design-team] Beta wallpaper revision

I love it. Fantastic colors!!! :) 2010/9/14 Máirín Duffy > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 17:18 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > Do you think this is something we could use for beta? Or is it the wrong > > direction? > > > > (source is: http://fedorapeople.org/groups/designteam/Resources/Fedora% > > 20Rel

Re: [Design-team] Beta wallpaper revision

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 17:18 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > Do you think this is something we could use for beta? Or is it the wrong > direction? > > (source is: http://fedorapeople.org/groups/designteam/Resources/Fedora% > 20Release%20Themes/F14/Wallpaper/F14-2400x15363.xcf ) It might help to link

Re: [Design-team] Beta wallpaper revision

Hi Emily, On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 18:50 -0400, Emily Dirsh wrote: > I know it's a bit down-to-the-wire, but I (finally! ;)) finished a new > revision of the beta wallpaper. It's up on the wiki now here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:F14-wallpaper-remix-em-light-rev1.png > > I replaced the l

[Design-team] Upcoming Fedora 14 Tasks

Start End Name Fri 10-Sep Tue 14-Sep Package: Beta Splash Screens Fri 10-Sep Tue 14-Sep Package: Beta Wallpaper Tue 14-Sep Tue 28-Sep Create Count Down Graphic Wed 22-Sep Fri 24-Sep Create Beta Website Banner Thu 23-Sep Thu 23-Sep Fedora 14 Beta Release Readiness Meeting Tue

Re: [Design-team] Beta wallpaper revision

Hi! 2010/9/11 Emily Dirsh > I know it's a bit down-to-the-wire, but I (finally! ;)) finished a new > revision of the beta wallpaper. It's up on the wiki now here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:F14-wallpaper-remix-em-light-rev1.png > > I replaced the light spots/lens flare with a light st

Re: [Design-team] Release criteria proposal: fedora release artwork

On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 09:49 -0400, James Laska wrote: > = Fedora 14 Alpha = > * The default Fedora artwork used must either refer to the current > Fedora release under development (Fedora 14), or reference an interim > release milestone (e.g. Alpha or Beta). If a release version number > is > use

Re: [Design-team] Supplemental Wallpapers

On 09/03/2010 09:09 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote: > On 09/03/2010 04:45 AM, Emily Dirsh wrote: >> >> I've also received positive replies from the folks I contacted. (5 for >> 5! woo!) I went ahead and updated the attributions on the wiki to comply >> with their individual attribution requests. > > Didn't

Re: [Design-team] Installation experience

Thanks for your advice and feedback Misha. There's plenty of things going on with the planning and development at the moment for future F14 and F15 releases. All feedback is taken into consideration. ;-) Regards Chris Jones On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 23:51 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > I decided

Re: [Design-team] Owners and (Co) Maintainers Email Meeting #4 [PUBLIC VERSION]--September 10, 2010

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote: > On 09/11/2010 10:50 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Nicu Buculei  wrote: >>> -1 to having application icons on the desktop, they are in the menu and >>> if the users want them on the desktop, it is trivial. >>