Hi all,
I've just noticed a few things:
* beta wallpaper is due next tuesday (15th March), same as verified
selection of supplementary wallpapers (submission period is supposed
to be closed already). How are things on this front?
* initial anaconda, firstboot and splashes are due next tuesday
On 03/10/2011 12:17 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
What kind of paper would you recommend using? That paper looks pretty
thick. I could try to print one out and take a photo with my SLR.
~M
Guess what? I feel like sending someone a fedora FreeMedia suddenly. I
think the mailer should look cool on a
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 09:02 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
> Thanks Duffy, thanks Ankur
Nah mate! Thank you twohot. :)
___
design-team mailing list
design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
Hi tatica!
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 07:00 -0430, María Leandro wrote:
> /me just saw an image that can save her life
>
> Those look fantastic! I could use those a lot for next FLISoL since I
> got sponsorship for printings and flyers (black/white)
>
> Where can I get the source?
https://fedorahos
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 06:17 -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> What kind of paper would you recommend using? That paper looks pretty
> thick. I could try to print one out and take a photo with my SLR.
>
>
Oh! That was a black and white print on normal A4 paper. (I'm trying to
cut down shipping costs s
Hello!!
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 09:02 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
> Thanks Duffy,
>
> Well, that picture doesn't quite capture it. Looks like Ankur
> doctored the image and lost some quality in an attempt to make the
> recipient's info discrete. I see strange pixel contrasts at the
> top-left ...
/me just saw an image that can save her life
Those look fantastic! I could use those a lot for next FLISoL since I got
sponsorship for printings and flyers (black/white)
Where can I get the source?
--
tatica
Maria Gracia Leandro
http://www.tatica.org
http://www.fedora-ve.org
http://proyectofed
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 09:02 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
> Thanks Duffy,
>
> Well, that picture doesn't quite capture it. Looks like Ankur
> doctored the image and lost some quality in an attempt to make the
> recipient's info discrete. I see strange pixel contrasts at the
> top-left ... like a col
Thanks Duffy,
Well, that picture doesn't quite capture it. Looks like Ankur doctored
the image and lost some quality in an attempt to make the recipient's
info discrete. I see strange pixel contrasts at the top-left ... like a
colour treatment or an enhancement curve was applied ... might ne
