Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> On 04/04/2013 11:01 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > I'll file an RFE for fedora-logos to replace the large sprite with
> > the one from the logos page on the wiki - that should solve this issue
> > at least.
>
> Ple
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
> Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > On 04/04/2013 10:33 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > ... especially since packagers aren't allowed to ship their own versions
> > > of any logos.
> >
> >
Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> On 04/04/2013 10:33 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > ... especially since packagers aren't allowed to ship their own versions
> > of any logos.
>
> My team and I are more than happy to discuss any new or modified usages
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
> Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > On Thu 04 Apr 2013 09:41:14 AM EDT, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > It's a fair policy, although given that this is merely using the logos
> > > present in the fedora-logo
Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> On Thu 04 Apr 2013 09:41:14 AM EDT, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > It's a fair policy, although given that this is merely using the logos
> > present in the fedora-logos package as-is (as I understand from Ryan's
> > mail)
Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> On 04/03/2013 03:33 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
> > control-center-3.8.0-2.fc19 added the Fedora logo (instead of the GNOME
> > logo) on the details panel of the GNOME desktop control center. This is
> > a good idea, but I see two problems:
> >
> > 1) Us
Ryan Lerch (rle...@redhat.com) said:
> On 04/03/2013 10:25 AM, Ryan Lerch wrote:
> >On 04/03/2013 03:33 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
> >>control-center-3.8.0-2.fc19 added the Fedora logo (instead of
> >>the GNOME logo) on the details panel of the GNOME desktop
> >>control center. This is a good idea, b
Luya Tshimbalanga (l...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> Greetings,
> I took over Design spin suite maintenance at the request of Sebastian.
> I notice the suite has not been updated for a while and will be a
> good time to review
> the listed package below.
>
> # gnome desktop
> gdm
> gnome-panel
> gn
Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> So here are some ideas I've seen for Beefy wallpapers:
>
> 1) Beefy in Famous Paintings
>
> Ceci N'Est Pas Une Franc
> http://publictest04.fedoraproject.org/artboard/post/view/91
> (Based on Magritte's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MagrittePipe
Timur Kristóf (ti...@sch.bme.hu) said:
> If we don't have any branding on Fedora's default installation, how will
> users be able to distinguish between Fedora and any other Gnome
> distribution?
We do have branding - the login screen, the bootup screen, and the desktop
background. (Seriously,
Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) said:
> I've edited the comps file, and would like to present it to you folks
> for review, before I submit it to the devel list and finally commit it.
>
> http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/misc/comps-diff-design-suite.patch
>
> Are the "defaults" and "opti
Nicu Buculei (nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro) said:
> > That's continuity within a release, yes. What I'm saying is that there's
> > very little continuity of the artwork from release to release *other* than
> > the color; some are more abstract, some are less, some are sharper (like
> > F-14), some are
Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > - fedora icon on the panel
> > - MgOpen/Comfortaa on materials/web site
> > - Some sort of blue background each release (with no continuity
> > from release to release)
> >
> > The first of these isn't noticeable unless you're looking really clos
Martin Sourada (martin.sour...@gmail.com) said:
> So in short, let's be *first* to ship GNOME 3 and let's be *first* to
> ship it with our own visual identity. We, the fedora design team, should
> be leaders in our area as well ;-)
I don't want to stir up too much of a hornet's nest, but does Fed
em...@bensoftent.com (em...@bensoftent.com) said:
> I think this is pretty easy, If GNOME 3.0 wallpaper must be there by
> default, we could add in a new feature during bootup or just before a
> users first login asking the user to choose between Fedora's Default
> Wallpaper & GNOME 3.0 Default wa
Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> >> Afaict nothing done on the linux desktop in the last 10 yrs has
> >> been anything other than a copy of whatever windows and osx did
> >> before.
> >
> > gnome-shell certainly doesn't look like Windows or Mac to me. Neither
> > does Moblin, for th
Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> Is this how you think of yourself? As the design Elite?
>
> Afaict nothing done on the linux desktop in the last 10 yrs has
> been anything other than a copy of whatever windows and osx did
> before.
gnome-shell certainly doesn't look like Windows
Nicu Buculei (nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro) said:
> > For what it's worth, RHL may have trouble signing off on a wallpaper that
> > uses
> > the Fedora logo, even if obscured, or as a resemblance, in such a way...
>
> Why?
> The wallpapers in Fedora 5, 6 and 7 used to have the logo.
Right, but those
Nicu Buculei (nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro) said:
> See, next week I will give a presentation about Fedora at a local
> conference (the audience will probably be mostly university students,
> maybe CS students). I cant talk with a straight face about the 4
> foundations when:
> - freedom: when we in
> I am worried about this tendency, from both Fedora and Ubuntu, of
> dumbing-down the desktop spins: if Windows does not offer any useful
> application out-of-the-box,our key to success is NOT to lower to the
> same level and also offer nothing useful as the OOTB experience.
Out of the box, th
Luya Tshimbalanga (l...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> I have modified the specification and removed the "Recommended" part.
> Swap is ignored.
> Comments?
The install DVD artwork should resemble the Live CD artwork in limits.
Bill
___
design-team mailing
Luya Tshimbalanga (l...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> That was quick. I have accidentally hit "Send" button and I have just
> uploaded newer version that includes 233 Mhz Pentium II class as
> recommended requirement. Perhaps I should listed as minimum requirement.
PDF is OK. PNG still has the old d
Luya Tshimbalanga (l...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> Could you verify the specification I listed on CD/DVD covers[1]?
> Suggestion welcome.
>
> Ref: [1] http://luya.fedorapeople.org/media/
200 Mhz Pentium-class or better is wrong. Pentium will *not* work.
Needs to be Pentium II (or Pentium Pro, bu
Luya Tshimbalanga (l...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> >> Ref: http://luya.fedoraproject.org/media
> >
> > The URL is http://luya.fedorapeople.org/media/ and I like a lot what you
> > did there.
> >
> > However, I am not sure we still support "200 MHz Pentium-class or
> > better" after http://fedorapr
Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/art/f12/oct%2020/
>
> I'd love to hear your thoughts. I think we want to stay with the order &
> chaos concept; Nicu and I brainstormed a bit and I started taking this
> direction where you have close-together/orderly bo
Martin Sourada (martin.sour...@gmail.com) said:
> > That being said, if you seen an app using an old bluecurve icon, feel
> > free to put a patch changing it to use a system theme icon in bugzilla...
> > (Or heck, just file a bug.)
>
> Sometimes there isn't a replacement for that.
Oh, I agree. Bu
Nicu Buculei (nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro) said:
> On 08/06/2009 11:35 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Just FYI
> >
> > http://blog.bobpeers.com/2009/08/05/old-fedora-icons/
>
> Known problem.
>
> A good part of those are Bluecurve icons but some are Tango (ex.
> Software Updates, which is newly adde
Máirín Duffy (mai...@linuxgrrl.com) said:
> I would like to keep the four foundations artwork as open as possible so
> I don't think that should be an issue in Tatica's design. The only logo
> element the four foundations contain is the empty bubble but I don't
> think that should be an issue from
Nicu Buculei (nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro) said:
> Here is the reply I received after asking for a license change for the
> wallpapers in old Fedora versions:
Would similar issues apply to any of the new backgrounds that use
the logo, or logo elements? (such as the four foundations mosaic,
or mizmo'
Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said:
> Hey all,
>
> we've been discussing the idea of changing the default GTK+/Metacity
> theme in F12. Nodoka has been the default for a while, and it seems to
> undergo a major rework now ( http://mso-chronicles.blogspot.com/ ).
>
> We don't want to do a
Ian Weller (i...@ianweller.org) said:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:00:01PM -0700, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > http://fedorapeople.org/groups/designteam/Projects/fedoraproject.org/v3/ideas/idea1.png
> >
> I know we love blue but I actually think there is way too much. And it
> looks ilke we're enclosi
31 matches
Mail list logo
