Hey all,
To me, our Trac ticket queue feels really disconnected from the rest
of our work. It's like a completely separate space that nobody keeps
track of. It's all out there in the open, which is great and all, but
we hardly pay attention to it. Or at least, I know I don't. :)
For instance
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 17:47 +0100, Jef van Schendel wrote:
We've got two main ways to keep track of new tickets: we can either
check the Trac page every day or get notified on IRC. The first one is
boring, slow and clunky. The second one relies on people being present
in the channel at the
On 02/07/2011 07:50 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
We could also take time during meetings to go through some.
well, that depends on how it is handled. If we're going to be
addressing lots of tickets in IRC meetings, the meeting will be
over-burdened. If we're going to be announcing tickets like
2011/2/7 Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org:
We could also take time during meetings to go through some.
Onyeibo's plan sounds good to me. Right now it just seems like people
who ask for help sometimes never hear back from us. :(
We have a separate mailing list for tickets so as to not
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 20:55 +0100, Jef van Schendel wrote:
2011/2/7 Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org:
We could also take time during meetings to go through some.
Onyeibo's plan sounds good to me. Right now it just seems like people
who ask for help sometimes never hear back from us. :(
On 02/07/2011 09:07 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I wouldn't have a problem merging the two lists. Do you want to file a
ticket on Fedora infrastructure trac to make it happen? It should be
under the Fedora hosted category.
~m
How about having trac CC-to Design-Team list ... so that there the trac
2011/2/7 Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org:
I wouldn't have a problem merging the two lists. Do you want to file a
ticket on Fedora infrastructure trac to make it happen? It should be
under the Fedora hosted category.
~m
Ok, so here's Ian's request for the design-team-tickets mailing
On 02/07/2011 09:29 PM, Jef van Schendel wrote:
2011/2/7 Máirín Duffydu...@fedoraproject.org:
I wouldn't have a problem merging the two lists. Do you want to file a
ticket on Fedora infrastructure trac to make it happen? It should be
under the Fedora hosted category.
~m
Ok, so here's
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 21:29 +0100, Jef van Schendel wrote:
2011/2/7 Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org:
I wouldn't have a problem merging the two lists. Do you want to file a
ticket on Fedora infrastructure trac to make it happen? It should be
under the Fedora hosted category.
~m
Hello team!
For me the tickets always where useful as they are.
We only need to be more active. FUDcon(tempe-panama) - FOSDEM take a lot of
time, also Fedora 15 atwork take a lot of time and effort and perhaps now
that almost all are done we will have more time to get back to the normal
tasks
With all due respect, I don't really need any more email. If people want to
get the tickets by mail they can subscribe to that list, where's the
problem?
Being subscribed to the QA list, their tickets spamming around in their
normal list is really annoying to me. :/
Fab
2011/2/7 María Leandro
On 02/07/2011 09:53 PM, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote:
Being subscribed to the QA list, their tickets spamming around in their
normal list is really annoying to me. :/
Fab
This is just what I was afraid of. I think we should be flexible with
this. Order is important and so is efficiency. As
12 matches
Mail list logo
