[Bug 251375] [NEW] gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm GDM need to have 'status' action on init script ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo (andreserl) Status: New ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) =

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Hope it is good :) ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16275080/gdm.status.debdiff ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Ok, modified debdiff with your suggestions, and suscribing to ubuntu- main-sponsors ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16286937/gdm.status.debdiff -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received thi

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Thanks for the review btw!! :) -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 251375] [NEW] gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm GDM need to have 'status' action on init script ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo (andreserl) Status: New ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) =

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Hope it is good :) ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16275080/gdm.status.debdiff ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Ok, modified debdiff with your suggestions, and suscribing to ubuntu- main-sponsors ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16286937/gdm.status.debdiff -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received thi

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Thanks for the review btw!! :) -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 251375] [NEW] gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm GDM need to have 'status' action on init script ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo (andreserl) Status: New ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) =

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Hope it is good :) ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16275080/gdm.status.debdiff ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Ok, modified debdiff with your suggestions, and suscribing to ubuntu- main-sponsors ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16286937/gdm.status.debdiff -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received thi

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Thanks for the review btw!! :) -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 251375] [NEW] gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm GDM need to have 'status' action on init script ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo (andreserl) Status: New ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) =

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Hope it is good :) ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16275080/gdm.status.debdiff ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Ok, modified debdiff with your suggestions, and suscribing to ubuntu- main-sponsors ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16286937/gdm.status.debdiff -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received thi

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Thanks for the review btw!! :) -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 251375] [NEW] gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm GDM need to have 'status' action on init script ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo (andreserl) Status: New ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) =

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Hope it is good :) ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16275080/gdm.status.debdiff ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Ok, modified debdiff with your suggestions, and suscribing to ubuntu- main-sponsors ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16286937/gdm.status.debdiff -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received thi

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Thanks for the review btw!! :) -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 251375] [NEW] gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm GDM need to have 'status' action on init script ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo (andreserl) Status: New ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) =

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-23 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Hope it is good :) ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16275080/gdm.status.debdiff ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Ok, modified debdiff with your suggestions, and suscribing to ubuntu- main-sponsors ** Attachment added: "gdm.status.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16286937/gdm.status.debdiff -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received thi

[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action

2008-07-24 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Thanks for the review btw!! :) -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 422110] Re: stickynotes_applet crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-09-02 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
Hey guys. I've managed to get the stickynotes applet icon added to the bar, however it fails to add new notes. The way I've managed to add it was by removing the previously created $HOME/.gnome2/stickynotes_applet file. After it has been removed, I added the applet and the icon was shown there and

[Bug 422110] Re: stickynotes_applet crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-09-02 Thread Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo
** Attachment removed: "stickynotes.gdb" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31264940/stickynotes.gdb ** Attachment added: "stickynotes.gdb" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31265099/stickynotes.gdb -- stickynotes_applet crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422110 You received this