BleachBit 4.6.0-4 fixed it and as bugfix only revision I think is
acceptable for Ubuntu 24.10 now in feature freeze. There is an Ubuntu
developer that want to sync it?
** Changed in: bleachbit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
the workaround of the fist message can be applied by any user, for change it by
default must be done in nautilus package (that contain nautilus.desktop, or in
latest versions org.gnome.Nautilus.desktop)
even if I'm not sure if is good do it as seems cinnamon some users use nautilus
(but probably
The MR with the second patch is still not merged upstream.
I tested on focal build without it (Fix subkey popmenu not showing after being
dismissed) (https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes)
and the crash is not reproducible, so if you want you can at least apply the
sec
the newer upstream changes you linked is bigger, for security update only small
build fix of first patch absolutely necessary I suppose ubuntu security team
would consider (along with the third patch with security fix).
however it would be good to have a certain answer before continuing to invest
** Changed in: caribou (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Fantu (fantonifabio)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to caribou in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912060
Title:
[SRU] caribou: Segfa
The security fix is the third patch, first is needed to fix build (or it
fails), the second is another fix, I don't have time now to done another
build without it and test if work correctly and usable also with the fix
of second patch as it is related to the part.
--
You received this bug notific
@Joshua Peisach: On ubuntu version released the only way to update is SRU:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
Do a backport (for example for focal in focal-backports) will require that user
enable backports (if not) and install it; user that don't know and do it will
not have the fix.
about Groovy I don't have time to test it today as I should create also a
Groovy vm (even if should be ok with the same focal patch only changing
focal->groovy)
@Joshua Peisach: can you do a test for Groovy and test it (if you can/want)
please?
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Patch added: "patch for focal"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/caribou/+bug/1912060/+attachment/5456637/+files/caribou_0.4.21-7_0.4.21-7ubuntu0.1.diff
** Description changed:
[Impact]
There is a regression after solving CVE-2020-25712
(https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.c
I changed title and description trying to follow
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template as
requested
** Description changed:
- It was found in cinnamon-screensaver that pressing ē can crash the
- screensaver and Cinnamon DE itself.
+ [Impact]
+ There is a regression after s
About Focal patch build
tested(https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes/) and
also installed and tested the packages (unable to reproduce the issue with new
patch applied).
On Groovy should work with the same patch (only changing focal->groovy) but I
not tested it.
--
** Patch added: "patch for focal fix"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/caribou/+bug/1912060/+attachment/5455950/+files/caribou_0.4.21-7_0.4.21-7ubuntu0.1.diff
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscri
0.4.21-7.1 fix it and is now in Hirsute (sync from debian)
** Changed in: caribou (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to caribou in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Autopkgtest seems still mark release for trusty as cause of regression :(
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021
Title:
g
Seems that is blocked because cause a regression (found with auto tests):
https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/trusty-adt-gvfs/lastBuild/
I not tested the official proposed packages but another I did with the same
patch before and is ok
Someone have tested the official proposed instead?
--
You rece
Why is itn't pushed to -updates for trusty?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021
Title:
gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021
Title:
gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
To manage notifications abou
Thanks mosta.
I think that in debdiff "Closes: #756205." should be replated by "(LP:
#517021)" and UNRELEASED with name of release but probably are things
that ubuntu-sponsors can do directly on commit.
Today I tested the patch in trusty, with it I'm unable to reproduce this
bug and I not found a
Public bug reported:
Using ubuntu 12.04 I found a problem already reported in bug 264803 and solved
some years ago.
For example using nautilus sftp://server1 doesn't work using the host defined
on ~/.ssh/config.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gvfs 1.12.1-0ubuntu1.1
ProcVe
The problem reappare in Precise, nautilus sftp:// seem not read configuration
from ~/.ssh/config
Someone can solve please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264803
Title:
doesn't read
20 matches
Mail list logo
