Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: eog
On a calibrated screen which use an ICC profile launched through
dispwin, Eye-of-Gnome display wrong colors. Indeed it seems Eye-of-Gnome
don't use well the ICC profile used by X.
On contrary all other apps like gthumb, GIMP, Fspot, firefox, ...
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager
This report belongs to wish list category.
The idea would be to have a field in the gnome-power-manager applet menu
to set the battery threshold (in %, time or both). This can useful as
the battery remaining time calculated can be
Just a comment to tell that today evolution crashed 2 times with the exact
same error message but this just looking and clicking in my junk folder.
I can't reproduce the crash with the memo though.
Hope this fix will solve this issue although i can't tell if my crash
happen often since it first
For the record my log tells:
evolution[13385]: segfault at 46eb7fb0 ip 05c4c019 sp bf84d0a8 error 4 in
libgobject-2.0.so.0.2200.2[5c44000+3c000]
Maybe not related afterall.
--
Pressing Enter or Tab in a new memo line (in memo list) exits Evolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460050
You
Let me join the group.
I experience xsession crashes with intrepid ibex with nvidia driver 173 and 177
present in the repos. For me this issue is not random and i have been able to
identify each time what to do to make session crash :
1- right click any Gdesklet
2- play with system-monitir
The
Thanks.
Since dapper gDesklet is just working great and i never experienced any
issue upgrading since dapper so i really wonder why it crashes so badly
now with metacity and only with metacity.
As a side note xfwm4 have embedded compositing where metacity hasn't
(not activated by default) so i
Same goes when you delete a bunch of messages to free some space the
result is that you delete mails through evolution but you get no free
space.
Seems to be basic feature but it's still not there, lets cross our
fingers for solution or at least a workaround.
--
evolution won't clear its cache
Could at least this be packed in the next ubuntu deb ? :
http://www.gnome.org/~carlosg/stuff/evolution/
--
evolution won't clear its cache
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21668
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Great !
Thanks for the update.
--
dot-thumbnails gets huge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130132
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I'm bumping this thread, we are many to long for an automatic cleaning
of old thumbnail.
This is a real pain to get almost 1Go of thumbnail, a good part of them
being unneeded and outdated.
What can we do to get this bug report taken in consideration for a new
additional feature to be included
I don't think this is an issue anymore, at least i don't feel any issue
now with hardy heron and long login.
Lets close this bug report, thanks for the reminder.
--
system preference sessions unchecked items still appear in session file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162831
You received this
Yes, i guess this impact only users playing with WM so maybe we can
safely consider than someone playing with WM is able to fix WM related
issues even though it would have been better to autodetect the WM while
generating the session file.
Anyway we can still re-open the bug latter if some users
Not sure to understand what you refering to saying Does that works with
another user?
--
system preference sessions unchecked items still appear in session file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162831
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a
This has been confirmed by some users on the forum if it's what you want to
know.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=568995
If the autostart file is doing is job despites the presence of the item in the
session file then this is not an issue but more an unusual way to handle this.
I mean
I'm using gutsy gibbon and the autostart enable is at false in the
bluetooth-applet.desktop file which correspond to the item i unchecked.
If the item is well disabled what is the point to keep it as entry in the
session files (my session file is linked in this post) ?
** Attachment added:
Ok please someone at least confirm this on another computer so we can
set this report as confirmed and not incomplete
I edited the description explaining how to reproduce the bug, i can
reproduce this as much as i want and i located the problem. Updating by
hand the Gconf key to /etc/bin/metacity
It may be related to a bug report i made :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/157780
Basically the command to save the session look at the Gconf key to get
the WM name and i noticed this key is not updated which make your
session still launching your old WM.
Check if my
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-session
Problem :
When you open the system preference sessions windows and uncheck the items
you don't need (typical example is bluetooth applet for those who don't have
bluetooth) this has no effect on your session file and all the items are
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-session
+ gnome-session-save command don't look at the WM your are using but at the
desktop gnome application window_manager current Gcong key which may
not be up to date.
+ In my case the current key was wrongly set to /usr/bin/xfwm4
Ok here some more informations.
I discovered some strange behaviour about gnome-session-save. YOu can
see in the gutsy generated session file that xfwm4 is set as default
manager with no reason. However for an odd reason the desktop gnome
application window_manager current Gcong key was set
One more thing i would like to add and which is really weird to me is
the presence of these lines in my gutsy generated session file (the one
who don't work ) :
,Program=xfwm4
13,CurrentDirectory=/home/frodon
13,CloneCommand=/usr/bin/xfwm4 --display :0.0
13,RestartCommand=/usr/bin/xfwm4
For the record here are some forum threads where many users are reporting the
issue, unfortunately they don't use launchpad :
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=585635
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=568995
** Changed in: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
Could some of you post their session file ?
Thanks
--
[Gutsy] GNOME takes too much time to load during system boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151544
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for meta-gnome2 in ubuntu.
--
Unfortunatly my old feisty session file is really different than the one
created under gutsy so it is hard for me to catch what could be wrong, in
addition i tried to delete my session file then start a new session and run the
gnome-session-save command with no apps opened and it results also
Sorry i wasn't clear in my previous comment, the file i posted in my
previous comment (wrongly called Feisty session file which is working
correctly) is the one i'm using now under gutsy.
--
gnome-session-save scew up session file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157780
You received this bug
Here is an ubuntuforum thread were users are reporting long login time,
so this might be also describing the same issue where the session file
is written in a way where the login time is really long. In my case i
never waited more than 2 minutes.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=585635
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-session
After gutsy upgrade, each time i use gnome-session-save it result in a broken
session file. With this broken session file impossible to finish the gnome
login (waited 2 minutes).
To workaround this i had to put back my old feisty session
Here is an example of a broken file generated by the gnome-session-save
command on my computer.
** Attachment added: Broken session file
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10186561/session_old
--
gnome-session-save scew up session file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157780
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ekiga
I've tried this on both dapper and edgy with a labtec webcam and a
Philips SPC 600 NC.
Both webcams are recognized and use the spca5xx drivers, however the
video controls settings don't work and leave a very dark image which
can't be tweaked
29 matches
Mail list logo
