[Bug 401823]

This seems more like a server issue. I think it could easily be possible for the server to guarantee that XIDs are not reused within a certain time period since it issued a DestroyNotify. That won't guarantee that clients are happy, but it can certainly help. We just need to store a

[Bug 11334]

This is just how selections work. If the application is closed, there's nobody to ask for the data. If you want this to work right, use a clipboard manager. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report

[Bug 106060]

No response. Closing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106060 Title: [r128 1002:5446] Selecting the Molecule screensaver makes the PC freeze. It is

[Bug 524830]

I don't see how this could be happening in xorg-server ... my guess is that it is kernel related. Keith, can you comment? Nicolo, are you still experiencing with newer kernels? Can you attach system information: lspci -v dmesg /var/log/Xorg.*.log etc -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 36812]

Deferring to 1.13 as this is functional change -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36812 Title: Keyboard layout change on hotkeys press instead of release and do not

[Bug 36812]

Lots of CCs ... I'm gonna bring this into the tracker to see if there's something we can eventually do about this in a way that won't break backwards compatibility. Daniel, do you have any thoughts about how this could be done by extending XKB rather than breaking it? -- You received this

[Bug 857159] Re: nautilus launches indiscriminantly (it should not launch for xfce, etc)

Confirmed fixed, thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857159 Title: nautilus launches indiscriminantly (it should not launch for xfce, etc) To manage

[Bug 857159] [NEW] nautilus launches indiscriminantly (it should not launch for xfce, etc)

Public bug reported: I just did a fresh install of 11.10 current (20110920 image and current repos). I installed xubuntu-desktop. When I login choosing xubuntu as my session type, nautilus is run even though I would expect it not to. The nautilus desktop window covers my xfce desktop. The

[Bug 414357] Re: [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems

yes, it is still a problem with Gnome. XFCE's widget acts as expected and is still a good work around. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems

[Bug 414357] apport-collect data

Architecture: powerpc DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: gnome-power-manager 2.28.1-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: powerpc ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-powerpc Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-powerpc ppc UserGroups: -- [karmic regression] APM:

[Bug 414357] Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37894073/Dependencies.txt -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414357 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 414357] DevkitPower.txt

** Attachment added: DevkitPower.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37894077/DevkitPower.txt -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414357 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 414357] GConfNonDefault.txt

** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37894086/GConfNonDefault.txt -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414357 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 414357] XsessionErrors.txt

** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37894087/XsessionErrors.txt -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414357 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 414357] gnome-power-bugreport.txt

** Attachment added: gnome-power-bugreport.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37894088/gnome-power-bugreport.txt ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Tags added: apport-collected -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize

[Bug 414357] Re: [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems

Distro version: squeeze/sid Kernel version: 2.6.31-14-powerpc g-p-m version:2.28.1 HAL version: 0.5.13 System manufacturer: missing System version: missing System product: missing AC adapter present: yes Battery present: yes Laptop panel present:

[Bug 414357] Re: [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems

As mentioned, xfce notices the state correctly, so I believe it's a problem with gpm or something that gpm depends on that xfce's power manager doesn't -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414357

[Bug 414357] Re: [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems

ping. This is a fairly annoying regression with Karmic/Gnome -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 376205] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()

I hit this a few months back, but I haven't seen the problem since... -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 414357] Re: [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems

BTW, the XFCE Power Manager works as expected and properly detects the state. -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 414357] Re: [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems

I was told that this isn't an issue in gnome-power-manager but probably a misconfiguration in HAL, since gnome-power-manager is abstracted above the APM/ACPI barrier... I have not confirmed this, however. -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only

[Bug 414357] Re: [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems

** Summary changed: - [karmic regression] gnome-power-manager does not recognize that powermac g4 is on battery + [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of APM-only (non-ACPI) systems -- [karmic regression] APM: gnome-power-manager does not recognize state of

[Bug 414357] [NEW] [karmic regression] gnome-power-manager does not recognize that powermac g4 is on battery

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager gnome-power-manager reports that my PowerMac G4 is connected to AC when in fact it is on battery. This is a regresison from Jaunty which correctly reported its status and handled change to a low-power state. jer...@aeris:~$ cat

[Bug 414357] Re: [karmic regression] gnome-power-manager does not recognize that powermac g4 is on battery

powersaved works as a workaround for dimming the screen, etc ... but it would be nice if gnome-power-manager could be updated to correctly show the status. -- [karmic regression] gnome-power-manager does not recognize that powermac g4 is on battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414357 You

[Bug 200580] Re: powernowd init script does not start the daemon on ppc (ondemand problem)

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 223812 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223812 Over a year later and still happening in jaunty and the current karmic kernel (2.30-rc4 based) -- powernowd init script does not start the daemon on ppc (ondemand problem)

[Bug 200580] Re: powernowd init script does not start the daemon on ppc (ondemand problem)

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 223812 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223812 And this isn't a bug with powernowd. This is a kernel bug... please change the component appropriately. -- powernowd init script does not start the daemon on ppc (ondemand problem)