[Bug 1823194] Re: Windows share (CIFS) mounted over gvfs (by tool Files) is about 10 times slower than mounted by mount -t cifs

2019-04-04 Thread Josef Mašek
Problem is not in gvfs. I found that I am connected to the same network by the 1 Gigabit copper interface and by the wireless. When I used mount, traffic went through 1 Gbit copper, when I used gvfs, traffic went by Wireless (~100 Mbit). Maybe is issue of the network manager? -- You received th

[Bug 1236619] Re: gvfs smb / cifs file copy performance is terribly slow

2019-04-04 Thread Josef Mašek
Problem in my case found - I am connected to the same network by the 1 Gigabit copper interface and by the wireless. When I used mount, traffic wen through 1 Gbit copper, when I used gvfs, traffic went by Wireless (~100 Mbit) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 1236619] Re: gvfs smb / cifs file copy performance is terribly slow

2019-04-04 Thread Josef Mašek
In my case, in 16.04 gvfs was same fast as mount -t cifs, but now in 18.04 I have gvfs about 9 times slower than mount (5 MB/s GVFS, 44 MBit/s mount and is probably disk limit now) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs i

[Bug 1823194] [NEW] Windows share (CIFS) mounted over gvfs (by tool Files) is about 10 times slower than mounted by mount -t cifs

2019-04-04 Thread Josef Mašek
Public bug reported: Copying data by Files says 5MB/s - when I use "Files" and I mounted windows share (from Freenas 9.x stable) and copy to local disk (also by Files). When I use "old way" in /etc/fstab is: //192.168.x.x/public /media/netio cifs noauto,guest,iocharset=utf8 mount /medi/netio

[Bug 1823194] Re: Windows share (CIFS) mounted over gvfs (by tool Files) is about 10 times slower than mounted by mount -t cifs

2019-04-04 Thread Josef Mašek
gvfs/bionic-updates,bionic-security,now 1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3 amd64 [installed] cifs-utils/bionic,now 2:6.8-1 amd64 [installed] mount/bionic-updates,now 2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.3 amd64 [installed] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1822635] [NEW] Graphical configurator wrongly requires IPv4 Gateway in routes list

2019-04-01 Thread Josef Mašek
Public bug reported: Valid IPv4 route configuration (in openvpn text configuration) is without gateway (route is going to the tunnel, so next hop is not required), eg: route 192.168.32.0 255.255.240.0 This valid configuration works when is imported by nmcli (open VPN tunnel by nmcli or GUI). Bu