[Bug 684649] Re: Nautilus desktop icons should never be under the launcher

2011-05-02 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
That's a fair request. For anyone using nautilus-elementary who may find this report in the future, see here: https://bugs.launchpad.net /nautilus-elementary/+bug/775727 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubun

[Bug 684649] Re: Nautilus desktop icons should never be under the launcher

2011-05-02 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
Thanks Sebastien! I'm using nautilus-elementary, so that explains it. ** Also affects: nautilus-elementary Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 684649] Re: Nautilus desktop icons should never be under the launcher

2011-05-01 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
Is this really fixed? I'm using the final release of Ubuntu 11.04, and I have a whole row of icons on my desktop that are almost completely obscured by the Unity launcher. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in U

[Bug 680340] Re: Rewrap lines when resizing the terminal

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
> where ideas go to die. Shame it tends to be that way, because there are definitely some good ideas there. > Is it appropriate to reopen it, or would that be considered rude? I'm not terribly familiar with Launchpad etiquette, but I'll save you the trouble and go ahead and re-open it for you. ;

[Bug 680340] Re: Rewrap lines when resizing the terminal

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
I disagree with the decision to close this (and move it to Ubuntu Brainstorm). The problem is specific: "text doesn't re-wrap when you resize a Terminal window," and there is only one logical solution: "rewrap the text when the window is resized." I think this is a great candidate for a "wishlist

[Bug 433330] Re: lost Free Cell on 9.10

2009-09-28 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
Just to clarify, Free Cell can be run with the command "sol --freecell", the problem is that there is no launcher for Free Cell. -- lost Free Cell on 9.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/40 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 420005] Re: black wins too easy... black has too many moves at once, human has only one. This game is invalid.

2009-09-28 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
What do you mean "too many moves at ones" ? If there are no possible moves for player1, then player2 continues making moves until it is possible for player1 to make a move. If the computer makes several moves in a row, it simply means that you couldn't have made any legal moves. Assuming I haven

[Bug 433330] Re: lost Free Cell on 9.10

2009-09-28 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
I can confirm this on 9.10. Aisleriot is installed, but Free Cell isn't available in the menu and GNOME Do can't find it. If it is installed, there's no obvious way to run it. ** Changed in: gnome-games (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- lost Free Cell on 9.10 https://bugs.laun

[Bug 35065] Re: icon very small on the desktop

2009-09-23 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
And just to correct my typo, the upstream bug is bgo:495279, which Andreas previously mentioned: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495279 -- icon very small on the desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 35065] Re: icon very small on the desktop

2009-09-23 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
I'm pretty confused about this bug report. The bug for the Banshee product is assigned to an upstream nautilus report (that is still open, but hasn't received a comment in well over 2 years). The actual upstream bug in Banshee is gbo#495279, which was resolved more than a year ago. I'm going to

[Bug 11222] Re: Add auto-organize support to Rhythmbox

2009-09-22 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
I changed the status to reflect my last comment. Feel free to change it back if I've somehow misinterpreted this. -- Add auto-organize support to Rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/11222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct

[Bug 11222] Re: Add auto-organize support to Rhythmbox

2009-09-22 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
I'm a little confused about why Banshee is listed as a package affected by this bug. Is this bug also requesting this feature for Banshee? because I'm pretty sure Banshee already does this (but not by default). Edit > Preferences > the options are available under File Policies. ** Changed in: ban

[Bug 374684] Re: After Upgrade to Jaunty ekiga reports "Could not register sip:@ekiga.net

2009-08-07 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
Registering my username when Ekiga starts is no longer a problem for me. I don't want to speak for everyone, but from my experience, this can be closed. -- After Upgrade to Jaunty ekiga reports "Could not register sip:@ekiga.net https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374684 You received this bug notifi

[Bug 374684] Re: After Upgrade to Jaunty ekiga reports "Could not register sip:@ekiga.net

2009-07-19 Thread Michael Martin-Smucker
I just decided to try Ekiga for the first time today. While going through the initial setup, I followed a link to ekiga.net where I set up my account. I put this account name into Ekiga's configuration assistant, and every time I start Ekiga, it gives me the "Could not register sip:@ekiga.net" bi