[Bug 112102] Re: Too easy to accidentally kill dbus from Services settings and lock yourself out of services

2009-08-20 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Fix as reached Jaunty for some time. I don't understand the ever-lasting debate here guys. If you're brave (or dumb) enough to says yes to the warning dialog, then you can't complain that your system broke. I could possibly make that warning even more frightening,t hough, and I will consider

[Bug 315002] Re: Changing your password does not take effect before session is restarted

2009-08-20 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
If I understand correctly the problem, you can only hit that bug when trying to get admin rights without having restarted your session. Is that the case? If so, I'm not able to reproduce that. Anyway, I'd see that more as a PAM/PolicyKit issue. Warning users is a mere workaround, since changes

[Bug 24874] Re: [network-admin] aliases hostname to 127.0.0.1 unconditionally

2009-08-20 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
It's been a long time without news on that bug. Are you still able to test it? It seems that it could have been fixed with bug 48216. Thanks! ** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- [network-admin] aliases hostname to 127.0.0.1 unconditionally

[Bug 31803] Re: [services-admin] Unchecking gdm in services-admin continues to start gdm at boot

2009-08-20 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Are you still experiencing that bug? If so, I'd need the output of 'ls /etc/rc*' before, between and after the two unchecking attempts. Thanks! ** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- [services-admin] Unchecking gdm in services-admin continues to start

[Bug 62949] Re: No way to configure mouse button number

2009-08-20 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No way to configure mouse button number https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/62949 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 67201] Re: [network-admin] network preferences gone after dapper - edgy upgrade

2009-08-20 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Closing since migration issues from three years ago will never be tackled now, sorry. And the issues described by comments 10 and 11 are in NetworkManager, nothing to do with the gnome-system-tools (I guess they're fixed now anyway). ** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 245809] Re: [hardy] Unlock button not in dialog

2009-08-19 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
I believe the bug you describe should be partially fixed in the upcoming release 2.27.3, soon available in Karmic. Now, users should be greyed out if one cannot edit them, and modifying your own account information will ask you to authenticate when pressing OK. Could you try that version, now or

[Bug 404767] Re: gnome-system-tools: mnemonic/accelerator shows as underscore instead of underline, and does not register with keyboard

2009-08-19 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
So your fix is the right one, but in the meantime we've moved to PolicyKit1, which allows us to replace that button with their stock unlock button. So that will be fixed in the upcoming 2.27.3, and you'll be able to drop the patch (which won't apply anyway). Thanks for your interest! --

[Bug 104957] Re: users with no password can't log in with gdm

2009-08-19 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Please, be rigorous when performing tests. This bug is about logging in from GDM, not form the fast-user-switch-applet. They can perfectly use different policy files in /etc/pam.d, so they need to be treated separately. And i don't see how this could be related to your kernel version

[Bug 200634] Re: Cannot authenticate user

2009-08-18 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
-system-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Milan Bouchet-Valat (nalimilan) -- Cannot authenticate user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200634 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu

[Bug 393854] Re: Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin

2009-08-16 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Ping... I'm not sure why the Ubuntu Security Team has been unsubscribed from this bug, but please have a look at that and leave a quick comment. Then the debdiff is ready to be applied... Thanks! ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Update PAM policy to allow

[Bug 408818] Re: users-admin missing gksu and has a number of errors

2009-08-16 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404767 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404767 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 404767 gnome-system-tools: mnemonic/accelerator shows as underscore instead of underline, and does not register with keyboard -- users-admin missing gksu

[Bug 4738] Re: user privileges affecting adduser component and sudoers

2009-08-16 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
teaker1s: I've followed the steps you describe in your comment, and I've not been able to reproduce the bug you describe with the latest development version. Can you still reproduce the problem on your side? To all: I'd really like to tackle this bug, but the reports here don't provide steps that

[Bug 404767] Re: gnome-system-tools: mnemonic/accelerator shows as underscore instead of underline, and does not register with keyboard

2009-08-15 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Hey, what's the joke here? Why did you add this patch to the Ubuntu package of the gnome-system-tools without even reporting it upstream? If we're sure that's the right thing to do, I'd have committed it in a few hours! Now, could you make the status of this bug clearer? The GTK+ upstream bug is

[Bug 404767] Re: gnome-system-tools: mnemonic/accelerator shows as underscore instead of underline, and does not register with keyboard

2009-08-15 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
OK, the problem has nothing to do with PolicyKit. That's only a change in GTK+ that affects the internals of g-s-t. I guess your patch (or something similar) is the way to go upstream, if we're sure the new default will stay. -- gnome-system-tools: mnemonic/accelerator shows as underscore

[Bug 371399] Re: Gettext support for GDesktopAppinfo

2009-08-06 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Actually it seems to work in the new GNOME Shell, which is now using GMenu to get the .desktop files. -- Gettext support for GDesktopAppinfo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0

[Bug 393854] Re: Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin

2009-07-30 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Here's the debdiff against GDM 2.27.4 which is now in Karmic. Please review! ** Attachment added: Updated patch for GDM 2.27.4 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29712507/gdm_2.27.4-0ubuntu7.debdiff ** Attachment removed: Fixed debdiff for gdm in Karmic

[Bug 393854] Re: Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin

2009-07-25 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Sorry Sebastien, but I've checked the file gdm.pam in gdm 2.27.4-0ubuntu6, and it's not applied. The upstream default file includes the required line, but AFAIK it's not used. ** Changed in: gdm Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up

[Bug 270238] Re: F-spot should remember if I want to copy photos to the Photos folder when importing

2009-07-04 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
The duplicate bug was declined for One Hundred Paper Cuts without precise explanation. I think that's wrong: this bug will hit any new user, it can be a real annoyance if the default is not what you want, and is easy to fix. It's just a matter of adding a GConf key and link it to the state of the

[Bug 104957] Re: users with no password can't log in with gdm

2009-07-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
...except that the upstream bug linked here does not deal with the present problem at all, and never has. It is now marked as Fix Released since I committed patches for that, but these patches are not related to our problem which *is only in Ubuntu packaging*. Upstream has nothing to do with this

[Bug 393854] Re: Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin

2009-07-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Woops! A good start would be to get group names right... Anyways, there was also a tabulation problem, the new patch uses spaces for aligns. ** Attachment added: Fixed debdiff for gdm in Karmic http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28593478/gdm_2.20.10-0ubuntu4.debdiff ** Attachment removed: Debdiff

[Bug 104957] Re: users with no password can't log in with gdm

2009-07-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Sorry, I thought I had been explicit enough. The present bug deals with users with an empty password (using 'passwd -d'), while bug 393854 is about users actually having a password, but GDM not checking it to log in. In the present bug, GDM is handling the problem fine, we only need our PAM

[Bug 28835] Re: Unmount in volume right-click menu, is tech-speak and undiscoverable

2009-07-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
As I said above, Nautilus developers consider they have fixed this problem using Eject all over the place, except for sub-volumes of a disk, which still use Unmount. But this case is relatively rare, for standard uses (USB key, audio player, external HD, network mount...) Eject will be used - and

[Bug 393854] [NEW] Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin

2009-06-30 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Upstream gnome-system-tools will have in 2.28 an option to allow specified users to log in graphically and locally without entering their password. This is intended for home users that can't use GDM's autologin because they are several on the same

[Bug 393854] Re: Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin

2009-06-30 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Attachment added: Debdiff to apply the required changes http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28548736/gdm_2.20.10-0ubuntu4.debdiff -- Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393854 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 393854] Re: Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin

2009-06-30 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #414862 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414862 ** Also affects: gdm via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414862 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin

[Bug 104957] Re: users with no password can't log in with gdm

2009-06-30 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
See bug 393854 for a related approach of the problem of password-less logins. It suggests using accounts that actually have a password, but not to check it when logging with GDM. While this may not suit all cases described here, that can solve many of them. -- users with no password can't log in

[Bug 104957] Re: users with no password can't log in with gdm

2009-06-30 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
BTW, the upstream bug in GDM has moved towards the solution I have described in my previous comment. As stated in this report, the present problem is in Debian/Ubuntu, not GDM. ** Changed in: gdm Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: gdm Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #414862 =

[Bug 343707] Re: Rhythmbox tries to find a codec for a m3u/html file

2009-06-28 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
No, the bug is marked as Fix committed, which means that the package with the fix has not yet been released in Karmic. That will come with the next version of Rhythmbox. -- Rhythmbox tries to find a codec for a m3u/html file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343707 You received this bug

[Bug 28835] Re: Unmount in volume right-click menu, is tech-speak and undiscoverable

2009-06-25 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Also affects: nautilus via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576587 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Unmount in volume right-click menu, is tech-speak and undiscoverable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28835 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 28835] Re: Unmount in volume right-click menu, is tech-speak and undiscoverable

2009-06-25 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
As you can see if you read the whole history of the upstream bug, this problem should be mostly fixed in the current development version. David Zeuthen and Alexander Larsson have improved the behavior of Nautilus so that removable devices have an eject option that unmounts all of its volumes and

[Bug 383255] Re: Eject/Unmount Human theme icon in Nautilus should have hover and click states

2009-06-20 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Mat: See upstream bug for an explanation of the problems behind this seemingly trivial improvement. ** Summary changed: - Eject/Unmount Human theme icon in Nautilus should have hover and click states + Eject/Unmount icon in Nautilus sidebar should have hover and click states -- Eject/Unmount

[Bug 383255] Re: Eject/Unmount icon in Nautilus sidebar should have hover and click states

2009-06-20 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #586458 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586458 ** Also affects: libgtk via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586458 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Eject/Unmount icon in Nautilus sidebar should have hover and click

[Bug 347590] Re: Remove notification when going to battery mode

2009-06-17 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Thanks for bringing back this one to my mind. Actually, I don't see this notification anymore. Looks like it's been removed on the way to final Jaunty. Thus closing. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Remove notification when going to battery

[Bug 41335] Re: DVD playing is not working correctly with totem-gstreamer

2009-06-15 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- DVD playing is not working correctly with totem-gstreamer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/41335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 283221] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-06-12 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 Sorry, that's because so many people reported this bug, developers are forced to make some cleaning from time to time, and every duplicate send one mail to everybody. Just understand they don't like that more

Re: [Bug 327735] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-06-12 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 Le vendredi 12 juin 2009 à 12:34 +, stek79 a écrit : *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 Sorry, can you explain how to unsubscribe? I've

[Bug 161826] Re: Totem-gstreamer package description lies, that DVD (with menus) playback and DVD subtitles + languages are supported

2009-06-08 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
...and Debian must have it for longer than Ubuntu. ** Changed in: totem (Debian) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Totem-gstreamer package description lies, that DVD (with menus) playback and DVD subtitles + languages are supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161826 You received

[Bug 236602] Re: No applications available for photo editing if Gnome is not installed

2009-06-08 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Cool! The problem here is that I could not find what system KDE 4 uses for MIME associations. It doesn't seem it uses update-desktop-database even though that's a freedesktop.org standard. So we could require GTK apps to depend on desktop-file-utils, but that's not really an easy task. Could

[Bug 236602] Re: No applications available for photo editing if Gnome is not installed

2009-06-08 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
That's what I was expecting (fearing)... The spec does not go until that part - though IMHO it could have been good to have a common command to do this kind of thing. The problem is, no package except ubuntu-desktop and a few others depend on desktop-file-utils. So fixing that detail would really

[Bug 236602] Re: No applications available for photo editing if Gnome is not installed

2009-06-08 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
GNOME packages are calling update-desktop-database and update-mime- database everytime they add a file to those places. Apps rely on GIO (mostly) to get the required data, but GIO only reads the cache file, I think - and does not depend on desktop-files-utils. Does KDE handle this automatically?

[Bug 236602] Re: No applications available for photo editing if Gnome is not installed

2009-06-07 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
And even 'sudo update-desktop-database', without any argument. ;-) -- No applications available for photo editing if Gnome is not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in

[Bug 236602] Re: No applications available for photo editing if Gnome is not installed

2009-06-07 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Apparently, there are two versions that Amarok can use of libgpod4: one with GTK, and one without. I guess that if you install the package libgpod4, and then gnome, that should work. But that should be handled more nicely, would you mind filing a bug against that package? But about the true

[Bug 236602] Re: No applications available for photo editing if Gnome is not installed

2009-06-07 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
OK, I've found it. Please run 'grep gimp /usr/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache', that will show you every file type for which GIMP is registered. -- No applications available for photo editing if Gnome is not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236602 You received this bug notification

[Bug 236602] Re: No applications available for photo editing if Gnome is not installed

2009-06-07 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
I'm a GNOME user, but these are supposed to be desktop-neutral, though I can't find the spec that deals with this precise problem. So from the result of these commands, it looks like the file does not exist, which can perfectly explain the problem. Can you install the package desktop-file-utils

<    9   10   11   12   13   14