[Bug 1641308] Re: Partitions display wrong in gnome -disks - ok in gparted

2019-01-30 Thread Sancho
Even if it would, I (n00b) don't know what you mean by "upstream". In Debian they still have serious udisks probs with add-, change-, update events (#571, 572, 573, 574, 581, 613), but I fail to see the context to simply opening GParted. And I don't gitMi$o, sorry. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1641308] Re: Partitions display wrong in gnome -disks - ok in gparted

2019-01-25 Thread Sancho
Hi, I'm on Cinnamon Mint 19.0 / 19.1 and have the same problem: After starting GParted once, the partition info for GNOME Disks (extended partition only) is permanently lost, even without any action in GParted. The corruption shows the extended partition empty, but it is not. Also see

[Bug 1168582] Re: Google talk Requires Authorization after suspend/resume

2013-04-27 Thread Sancho
Same problem here, rebooting doesn't even help most of the time. Removing the google account and adding it again makes it work until the next reboot or suspend. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1152883] [NEW] gvfsd-sftp do not preserve file ownership on file modification operation

2013-03-09 Thread Sancho
Public bug reported: Problem overview: When using gvfs-sftp connection to modify some remote files, editing remotely (with gedit, sublime, etc) then saving these files changes their user and group ownership on server. Problem configuration: - one desktop with Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS and Unity

[Bug 1152883] Re: gvfsd-sftp do not preserve file ownership on file modification operation

2013-03-09 Thread Sancho
As mentions Scott (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/227808/comments/27): I hope this bug is fixed soon as it completely ruins a really cool way of working in Linux. ** Description changed: Problem overview: - When using gvfs-sftp connection to modify some remote files,

[Bug 777722] [NEW] I can't send e-mails with one of my accounts

2011-05-05 Thread Alvaro Sancho Nieto
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution One of the SMTP servers (alu.umh.es) needs TLS and uses port 587. It works with this settings in my htc android phone. I wasn't able to change the port, is it possible? I don't know the authentication method ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease:

[Bug 777722] Re: I can't send e-mails with one of my accounts

2011-05-05 Thread Alvaro Sancho Nieto
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22 Title: I can't send e-mails with one of my accounts -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 777722] Re: I can't send e-mails with one of my accounts

2011-05-05 Thread Alvaro Sancho Nieto
Perhaps it's not a bug, only a missing feature (change the default port) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22 Title: I can't send e-mails with one of my

Re: [Bug 648443] Re: empathy-accounts crashed with SIGSEGV in free()

2010-10-27 Thread Sancho
Hello I haven't had the problem since I did a clean install with the official release of maverick, so I guess it has been solved. Greets Steven On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 19:29 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: Thanks for the report, is this still an issue with 2.32 on Maverick? ** Changed in:

[Bug 286050] Re: Cannot change volume with keyboard volume dial while in drop down menu.

2010-07-31 Thread Sancho Panza
I confirm this bug on Lucid running on Thinkpad T61. This bug did exist on Karmic also. Let me know if you need more information. I'm not an expert with the command line fyi. Cheers, -- Cannot change volume with keyboard volume dial while in drop down menu.

[Bug 150112] Re: GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionality

2010-05-23 Thread Sancho Panza
@antistress: Please check if your new bug report is a dupe of the ones already in remote bug watch above. -- GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionality https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug

[Bug 150112] Re: GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionality

2010-05-22 Thread Sancho Panza
** Summary changed: - GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionnality + GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionality -- GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionality https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a

[Bug 150112] Re: GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionnality

2010-05-21 Thread Sancho Panza
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #149572 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149572 ** Changed in: nautilus Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Remote watch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #149572 ** Tags

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2010-05-17 Thread Sancho Panza
Approx. when can we hope to find this patched version in the repos? And for which Ubuntu versions? Thanks, -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2010-05-17 Thread Sancho Panza
Thanks for the info. I'm on Karmic and so is there any way I can find any non-canonical repo with the patched version? -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2010-05-17 Thread Sancho Panza
I had tried that before and ran is problems with dependencies and stuff, and I know to use the CLI for basic stuffs only. I guess I'll have to wait till someone packages it into some repo. Its been a long time I've been waiting for this patch. Thanks again, -- in trash: show delete-date

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-11-29 Thread Sancho Panza
@ Marcus: Is there a repository that you are aware of that hosts the patched nautilus? I checked yours, but wasnt sure if it was the one I was looking for. Thanks for all your efforts! -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification

[Bug 474550] Re: Karmic isn't able to shut down in my laptop, nor to switch on!

2009-11-22 Thread Sancho
I think this should be linked to my error: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/486576 -- Karmic isn't able to shut down in my laptop, nor to switch on! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-10-02 Thread Sancho Panza
I could not go beyond # apt-get build-dep nautilus due to error E: Build-dependencies for nautilus could not be satisfied. I tried fixing it using some development libraries like gtk etc., but got drawn deeper into dependency hell. -- in trash: show delete-date

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-10-02 Thread Sancho Panza
@ Marcus: No, I'm running Jaunty. I realise it was bcos I have a modded libcairo that I need to fix a firefox bug. But even after I fixed that issue, I had problems with the patch not being applied despite using various prefixes from 05-20 for the patch file. -- in trash: show delete-date

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-09-14 Thread Sancho Panza
:D Sorry I didnt fully get you. The only way I can afford is by adding/enabling a repository in synaptic and letting the system take care of the conflicts/dependencies. Is there anyway I can do that in this situation? I cannot risk messing too much with my system as this is the only one I have

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-09-13 Thread Sancho Panza
Thanks for the effort. Let us know if there is anything we can do. FYI...I'm a non-programmer, but can help with some testing if needed. Cheers, -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 222068] Re: nautilus trash does not show file origin or deletion date

2009-08-07 Thread Sancho Panza
The duplicate of tag was removed since none of the other related bugs (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/150112, https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/301552 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/228369) mention displaying the file origin. Either rephrase this or

[Bug 222068] Re: nautilus trash does not show file origin or deletion date

2009-08-07 Thread Sancho Panza
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- nautilus trash does not show file origin or deletion date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

[Bug 228369] Re: add an option to autodelete items from trash:/ after a specified span of time

2009-08-07 Thread Sancho Panza
Isnt this bug a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/150112 ? -- add an option to autodelete items from trash:/ after a specified span of time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-08-06 Thread Sancho Panza
Thanks for the prompt response Pedro. It would help if you clarify my next logical question: How is one supposed to use the Trash feature in ubuntu? Is it currently meant only for the purpose of immediate (NOT short/long term) retrieval of deleted files? Because I cannot currently empty the

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-08-04 Thread Sancho Panza
Some updates here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1178917 -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-08-04 Thread Sancho Panza
And some more here: http://code.google.com/p/trash-cli/ -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-08-04 Thread Sancho Panza
A similar bug has been fixed in KDE/Kubuntu and is discussed here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/228369 Using all the links to code above and the Kubuntu bugfix, it doesnt seem like fixing this bug in Ubuntu/Nautilus should take too long for a programmer (unfortunately I'm not, so

[Bug 372132] Re: Create Document Templates difficult to use

2009-06-19 Thread Sancho Panza
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: New = Confirmed -- Create Document Templates difficult to use https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 372132] Re: Create Document Templates difficult to use

2009-06-18 Thread Sancho Panza
** Summary changed: - Create Document Templates + Create Document Templates difficult to use -- Create Document Templates difficult to use https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 372132] Re: Create Document Templates

2009-06-16 Thread Sancho Panza
The justification for marking this bug as invalid in Nautilus is (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/372132/comments/3): the rational to have no template by default is that the choice of what to put there is an user one and upstream is against giving a way for applications to

[Bug 372132] Re: Create Document Templates

2009-06-16 Thread Sancho Panza
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: Invalid = New -- Create Document Templates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-06-15 Thread Sancho Panza
Related (not duplicates) bugs are https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150112 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228369 These are functionality that is necessary when a user runs low on diskspace. A user cannot decide which files are to be emptied from the trash (automatically or manually) unless

[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date

2009-06-15 Thread Sancho Panza
I cannot comment on whether this is trivially fixable or not, but as an end user I find the Trash feature practically useless if I cannot clean out large quantities of trash (automatically or manually) periodically. Knowing the delete date is vital to achieving this (and is not a feature request,

[Bug 386150] Re: Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly

2009-06-15 Thread Sancho Panza
The tabbing functionality in Nautilus is something that I often use. But I always have to use Ctrl-T to open a new tab or click thru the menus to open a new tab. How about adding a new new tab button to the Nautilus toolbar which would open a new tabbed Nautilus window? -- Nautilus file

[Bug 372132] Re: Create Document Templates

2009-06-15 Thread Sancho Panza
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Create Document Templates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 202457] Re: Preferences option for Removable Drives doesnt control Removable drives

2008-04-26 Thread Sancho
The removable drives are missing. The problem of autorun is only a part of the tab's previous functionality. I need to disable automount of media -otherwise I am stuck and can't work with damaged USB sticks etc. The system automaticaly tries to scan the inserted disk and it will get stuck. This

[Bug 175449] Re: Eye of Gnome print fails

2008-04-22 Thread Sancho
I have the same bug by printing for example with evince. But I have Brother HL-5270DN. I get printed only ERROR NAME: ioerror COMMAND: fill OPERAND STACK: -- Eye of Gnome print fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 175449] Re: Eye of Gnome print fails

2008-04-22 Thread Sancho
I have the same bug by printing for example with evince. But I have Brother HL-5270DN. I get printed only ERROR NAME: ioerror COMMAND: fill OPERAND STACK: -- Eye of Gnome print fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu