Well, there already seem to be lots of bugs upstream, per my previous
comments. Some of them suggest it should have been fixed some time ago,
so maybe a fix got into Intrepid?
--
gnome-terminal memory leak
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138607
You received this bug notification because you are
I did some hunting upstream. These bugs blame a bug in Xft on versions
of X lacking RENDER support:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95023
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99255
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100269
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107911
Th
That option was already off for me. I don't know if this is precisely
the same issue, but I have observed that it seems to use an inordinate
amount of memory. I previously had a maximum scrollback size of 10
lines, which works out to 62 MB per tab, but my memory usage went a lot
over that aft
1) Which accessibility options might these be? I'd be happy to disable
them, but I can't find them.
2) Is this bug still supposed to be Incomplete? The requested
information was attached.
I've experienced this bug. I just realized gnome-terminal was using
>500 MB of resident memory, and probab
Opening top and gnome-system-monitor simultaneously (in Feisty), I can
observe that top takes < 1% CPU, g-s-m takes 10-30% CPU. This isn't a
misreporting issue unless it's at a lower level: as ld2ndR says, the two
report similar results. The fact that top takes much less is also
notable, in that
