Hello,
I cannot test it anymore in Ubuntu, as I have removed Ubuntu from this
machine, but I do *not* believe that it related to Wayland and I'm
positive that it relates to the NVidia proprietary driver on my machine
as explained above.
For I discovered the same issue after installing Manjaro
Detail of my the affected machine :
Motherboard
produit: M3N78-VM
fabriquant: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
BIOS
fabriquant: American Megatrends Inc.
identifiant matériel: 0
version: 1406
date: 10/30/2009
Video
NVidia C77 [GeForce
I could narrow this bug with a 100% certitude (and confirm it also on
Manjaro Linux on the same machine) with using the NVidia 304 proprietary
driver.
My machine has a NVidia C77 [GeForce 8200] (rev a2) which is unsupported
with latest NVidia 340 drivers (the system justs freezes).
It used to
BTW, about the punctuation signs that, in French, requires a nbsp before
them, i.e. ; : ! ? (for perfect typographic correctness, while
usually few people know about this and nobody really cares...) :
Usual word processing programs, such as OpenOffice / LibreOffice, when
configured to the
About a short nbsp in french, let's make it perfectly clear that there
must be about a hundred professionnal typographists in the whole country
who care about it - most of them not using Linux BTW - and the rest of
the ~40 million computer users here don't give a shit about a short
nbsp and don't
Okay, your vote is currently happening on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013881
with 4 new entries today (from different people), 100% of them saying :
« PLEASE GIVE US OUR RIGHT [CTRL] KEY BEHAVING AS A [CTRL] KEY BACK !!!
»
To summarize further, AFAIK, there is ONE person in the world
Great ! Now the FR right [Ctrl] is B.R.O.K.E.N on Ubuntu 14.04 as well.
Given the number of french Ubuntu users (+ upcoming derivatives) I think
you'll have your vote and survey very soon, just by taking a look at
lauchpad bug entries and new comments on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013881 -
BTW Sergey, I'm a bit surprised that you want a vote to fix something
that people complain about, when you didn't need any vote to break it in
the first place...
Would you need a vote, I suggest that you put a survey system online by
yourself on any web page that you'd like (so you know the vote
Sergey, you might want to check Ubuntu bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xkeyboard-config/+bug/1013881
, which is a downstream reflection of this one.
There are some other loud voices there that you might consider as
taking part to the vote that you want.
I had in my office 2 peopl
Repeating :
1/ Standard French keyboard has NO [CtrlGr] key. It does have 2 normal
[Ctrl] keys bearing the exact same label. The right [Ctrl] key actually
is a right [Ctrl] key and no other modifier or whatever.
2/ There are quite a *lot* of common, daily used by professional IT
staff, keyboard
Even though I've been an IT professional for the past 3O years, I went
to a large computer store in France over lunch time, to find out if such
thing as a [CtrlGr] key could possibly exist on a french keyboard.
Let me tell you : I couldn't find any.
OTOH, I was surprised to notice that some
I had yet another good reason to revert to a normal right [CTRL] key
on a Fedora this morning:
I was working in a terminal with several open terminal tabs. Switching
between tabs is made using [Ctrl]-[PageUp] and [Ctrl]-[PageDown] - same
goes with other Gnome tabbed apps, as well as Firefox and
I spent a couple days extremely disappointed to have a broken right
[CTRL] key on a french keyboard on recent Arch installs, thus being
unable to use VirtualBox properly, and googling around (and let me tell
you that my googling showed me a *lot* of french people are really upset
with this as
(In reply to comment #50)
Could someone create poll on some french(belgian) web site, linux-oriented.
Which behavior would be preferable?
A poll would be pointless as its representativeness would be very hard to
determine.
Most users don't care as long as it works and may not even know there
I upgraded my Ubuntu installations to ArchLinux, and my problems are
gone :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193522
Title:
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in
I even got the t-shirt and keyboard sticker :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193522
Title:
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_action_get_name()
To manage
Public bug reported:
When trying to rip a CD to MP3 Extract to library, I get a message
stating that required libraries are missing. Trying to install these
libraries fail - in the attached pictures, it would want to install i386
libs on and AMD64 machine, and the install button is greyed out -
** Attachment added: 2nd screen capture
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1083136/+attachment/3444046/+files/rythmbox_121126b.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: 3rd screen capture
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1083136/+attachment/3444047/+files/rythmbox_121126c.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
In gnome-control-center, privacy settings, the history retention
duration displays past hour. If set to any other value (i.e. past
week), it stubbornly goes back to past hour.
Seen on 3 different machines, thus confirming immediately.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061058
Title:
[Quantal]
Public bug reported:
When using BTRFS with several mounted BTRFS subvols from the same BTRFS
volume, gnome-system-monitor adds the free space off all mountpoints,
where they in fact share the same HD space.
So the amount of free space displayed by gnome-system-monitor is several
time bigger than
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043296
Title:
Wrong HD free space displayed by system monitor when using BTRFS
To manage notifications about this bug
Public bug reported:
When using BTRFS with several mounted BTRFS subvols from the same BTRFS
volume, gnome-control-center adds the total space of all mountpoints,
where they in fact share the same HD space.
So the amount of total HD space displayed by gnome-control-center is
several time bigger
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043301
Title:
Wrong total HD space displayed by Gnome control center when using
BTRFS
To manage notifications about
** Description changed:
When using BTRFS with several mounted BTRFS subvols from the same BTRFS
volume, gnome-system-monitor adds the free space off all mountpoints,
where they in fact share the same HD space.
So the amount of free space displayed by gnome-system-monitor is several
That's not only live ISO testing. I've been having this very problem on
my (1024x600) netbook since Oneiric (or was it Natty ?) and it's still
there in Precise Beta :
- Right after login, I always have the 3 topmost icons on my desktop OK,
while the lower-end icons are all piled on top of each
Might or not be related... As I'm back to my good old KDE, I couldn't
give more feedback on this issue.
But yesterday I've noticed that my KDE had turned off desktop effects
because it crashed once, and I reactivated them. It works. But since
I've noticed a couple of KDE session crashes at system
I'm normally more of a KDE user (and I went back to KDE because of this
error, among other issues and dislikes I have with Gnome).
However I've been back to Gnome for testing this issue, and have to say
that since latest updates, I've been unable to reproduce the Gnome crash
at system wake up.
Public bug reported:
This issue looks somewhat recent, I don't recall it ever happening in
the past.
On Dell XPS M1330, Oneiric, when resuming from suspend to RAM the X
server and Gnome session dies and I'm back to the DM.
I file this under Gnome-session as the same machine shows absolutely
no
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882956
Title:
[Oneiric] [Dell XPS M1330] Gnome session dies at resume
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Yes AND No.
With latest Oneiric updates as of right now (2011/10/12 16:07 UTC) :
- xset q shows DPMS active with all timeouts set to zero (where they
previously were set to 600 before updates).
- Watching a movie (with the screen fade to black set to 30 minutes in
control panel) :
1/
Bug is more than 2 years, old, confirmed, really annoying, probably
affecting much more people than those who took the time to report it,
probably easy checking and fixing, still undecided and unassigned.
So what ? Should we start torturing kitten until somebody puts a helping
hand on it ?
--
Public bug reported:
On Dell Inspiron 9300, Oneiric beta (all updates as of 2011/10/07) the
Ubuntu Gnome session starts with sound volume to the max, producing a
tremendously loud session opening jingle.
Lowering volume, logging out and rebooting, the problem is back (set
volume isn't
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869795
Title:
Gnome session starts with maximum sound level
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
@Sebastien : Tested, xset -dpms gives a correct workaround to the
situation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857168
Title:
Screen goes black while
About the screen going black while watching a video, you might want to
check bug #857168 (and possibly mark yourself affected by this bug).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
There are good chances, and that would make bug #862139 a duplicate of
the present bug.
xset q shows DPMS is active with all of its timeouts set to 600,
although no such thing should be set according to my control panel
settings.
xset -dpms turns it off, but I'll have to wait until I watch a
The matter is that an external monitor is turned into standby/suspend by
using DPMS , not barely displaying a black image...
Furthermore, all this had been perfect for years (on same system) and
has been broken by upgrading Natty = Oneiric Beta.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Crashed right after installing latest updates, rebooted, logging in...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832603
Title:
gnome-settings-daemon crashed
Thanks for your time and explanations Dylan.
Obviously we disagree on some aspects, I'm not going to answer in too
long here because you're right on one point : a bug reporting tool is
not a web forum, so this is surely not the right place for arguing for
pages.
So I'm first being more specific
About having to find the different setup tools in the applications menu
or system settings panel, I can share a couple thoughts :
1/ In the past it seems that a number of optional applications (i.e.
gparted) found their way into the config panel if installed, and not if
not installed. It worked 6
About discussing all these issues in the Wiki or elsewhere, all of these
are mostly developpers tool, to decide things in advance. But the very
purpose of beta versions is to get early user feedback, which will come
as bug reports and feature requests rather that on developer's forums,
Public bug reported:
Upgrading from Natty to Oneiric, and furthermore, comparing Natty and
Oneiric's machines, it's really impressive to notice how many features
have been lost in Gnome's Control Center, making Oneiric's one truly a
Poor man's control center.
For example :
- No Screen Saver
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85
Title:
[Oneiric] Poor man's control center
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
No opinion. All _facts_ are described in detail and can be easily
checked. It's not an opinion that this is a regresssion. The opinion
is that this is a MAJOR regression.
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification
We're not looking for a workaround, we're requesting a bugfix.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808512
Title:
No way to configure screensaver in Oneiric
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 808512 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808512
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 808512
No way to configure screensaver in Oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
This bug should definitely be addressed. Having no way to configure a
screensaver is clearly a regression, and is an UI competitive
disadvantage compared to all other common OSes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
While watching a video in Ubuntu Gnome/Unity GUI with the video player
(Totem), screen goes black after a while, where the use of a video
player was inhibiting the screensaver to kick in in previous Ubuntu
versions.
Furthermore, in Control panel, the setting for screen to go
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857168
Title:
[Oneiric] [Regression] Screen goes black while watching video
To manage notifications about this bug go
Which config dialog ? The one in Oneiric, related to screen lock, is
very poor. Currently it has only 2 settings :
- Turn off after : 1 hour (maximum settable)
- Lock : Off (disabled)
- No Dim to save power option, this is a desktop machine.
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Attachment added: Gnome power management settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/857168/+attachment/2447737/+files/power_manager.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
Attaching .xsession-errors gzipped, debug mode active, as requested.
Please note that the attached monitor turned to powersave mode after ~19
minutes while watching a movie using Totem. At the time the monitor
turned off, and when it went back on after I hit a key, the error log
recorded nothing
** Attachment added: Gnome monitor settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/857168/+attachment/2447738/+files/monitor_settings.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
UP !
This bug has been reported 2 months 1/2 ago. It prevents starting
Ubuntu's main Unity environment from KDM. So it should be rated
CRITICAL.
A 4-lines script fix has been proposed in comment #6. This fix works and
would be trivial to package.
So WTF ?
--
You received this bug notification
** Package changed: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu) = kde-workspace (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772486
Title:
[Natty] Unity will start from GDM, not from KDM
Should we say nobody cared for the past 5 years, which is the age of
some Evolution window too big for 1024x768 displays bugs ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
In Nautilus, right-clicking the name of an USB key (FS mountpoint) gives
an option to get a properties page. This properties pages holds a
place where the FS name is displayed and can be changed. Anyway, typing
anything there always produces an
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793078
Title:
[Natty] Cannot rename FAT32 volume (USB Key)
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
This bug is *NOT* a duplicate of bug #23810. Bug #23810 talks about a
specific dialog window, this bug talks about Evolution main window.
Furthermore, bug #23810 is dated October, 2005 !! Is such a usability
bug has stayed in Evolution for 6 years () that would mean that
Evolution is a piece
A 5 years-old usability bug affecting 43 (known) people which importance
is just raised to medium now... Are u serious ?
Going as is goes, it will be raised to should be considered like
deserving some kind of fix ten years from now ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver
Noticed recently (but often) on Dell XPS M1330 (Intel graphics), looks
like a regression :
- When system has gone to screensaver, then screen turned off, moving
mouse brings back a screen on which screensaver is static (stopped),
mouse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787349
Title:
[Natty] Cannot exit screensaver : frozen
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
When right-clicking in Nautilus on a CIFS mounted network share,
contextual menu displays Unmount option, however clicking this option
displays an error box Operation unsupported by engine. However trying
to unmount the same share on the
** Attachment added: Error message (french locale version)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779149/+attachment/2118644/+files/umount_cifs_110507a.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
@Sebastien Bacher #12 : No, I do not have evolution-rss installed, so it
definitely isn't the cause for this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752040
Title:
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774029
Title:
[Natty] Evolution window cannot fit in 1024 width
I have tested this on 3 machines, all upgraded from Maverick to Natty,
all having more or less the same setup.
The about me box doesn't remember its contents on one machine, but
works properly on the 2 other ones. Don't know why, however.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Bug confirmed to exist yesterday 30/04/11
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752040
Title:
Evolution setup label not visible
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution
In Ubuntu Natty default config, Evolution's window cannot be made to fit
into a 1024 x something screen. If you try to reduce the window width,
its minimum stays a bit wider than 1024. Even when maximized the
window contents seem to be wider
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774029
Title:
[Natty] Evolution window cannot fit in 1024 width
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution
Display controller: Intel Corporation N10 Family Integrated Graphics
Controller
In Evolution's new account creation dialogs, legend texts disappear a
few seconds after appearing, leaving boxes to fill but you don't know
what are the questions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774047
Title:
[Natty] Evolution new account creation dialog corruption
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-control-center
Natty: After having filled the gnome-about-me box and closed it, opening
it again brings empty box ; previous contents are not restored.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: gnome-control-center 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu15
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773063
Title:
[Natty] gnome-about-me box doesn't remember contents
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
76 matches
Mail list logo
