I'm stumbling into this bug now and then, using standard C code to query
gnome-keyring via gnome_keyring_find_password_sync()
Works most of the time, but returns the error with an approximated ratio
of 2% of the times it is called. In some implementation this may lead in
a dialog asking a password
Thanks for the references to the upstream process.
Not just the executable bit, but also the file magic (shell script or
ELF) could be parsed to sort out problems.
However, I guess this is not the place for discussing this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Mantas Kriaučiūnas wrote:
> It's simple to return back old behavior - set dconf setting value:
> org.gnome.nautilus.preferences executable-text-activation
> to 'ask'
"simple"? most ubuntu users are afraid to open a Terminal.
however, thanks for the info, but this discussio
I confirm this error still occurs using libsecret from the Debian
package version 0.18.5-3.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221955
Title:
GNOME_KEYRING_RESUL
It is not an unuseful comment, is UX feedback, which should be valued
the most. When I initially reacted to this bug, I was reporting my
experience helping users update and observing their struggle with layers
of fixes on their desktop, often scripts made by friends to help execute
tasks.
A LEAN U
Hi again.
This bug affects every software using gnome-keyring and as such
represents a serious security issue which should be examined with
attention, to avoid future surprises.
The gnome-keyring is the gateway keeper to all passwords saved on gnome
desktops, used via dbus which may also be a cau
olved upstream before our next 1.3
release.
- once done upload a new version on my ppa.
ciao
--
jaromil, upstream maintainer of frei0r-plugins
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Branch linked: lp:~jaromil/frei0r/master
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459940
Title:
Launching totem when frei0r-plugins is installed shows: Could not load
upstream frei0r 1.3 release now fixes this bug.
i'm now uploading a new .deb package on ppa:jaromil/frei0r
** Changed in: frei0r (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => jaromil (jaromil)
** Changed in: frei0r (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You receiv
frei0r 1.3 it is a stable development release.
i'm just done compiling and uploading other packages, cross-compiling for
different platforms and then also updating the webpage on freshmeat. it all
just takes some time.. will be up on freshmeat within 24h.
thanks for reacting so fast!
--
You re
packages ready on ppa:jaromil/frei0r
** Changed in: frei0r (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459940
Title:
Launching
This bug was not solved, by closing it you imply there was no bug in the
first place, but people disagree to that. I for one report the bug is
there, .5 seconds is a too short delay and there is no way to change it.
Meanwhile a patch was also released, see:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t
We should pay attention to this indeed.
This is a radical change for many users acquainted to execute shell scripts or
having them written by friends to fix things.
Believe me, this happens *all the time*.
Changing this behavior without any notice is irresponsible, a very
conservative step that
i suggest for the future to take the source repository and the GPG
signed message by upstream maintainers as authoritative source for a new
release. thanks for your attention to details!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
it's on ppa:jaromil/frei0r
if problems arise and you can fix them youself i'm happy to incorporate
contributed patches upstream (either in master or ubuntu0 branch) just
please format them with 'git format-patch'
ciao
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desk
i'm sorry but the ppa is not accepting it. i don't know what's wrong:
ultimately its just a matter of changing a debian/changelog name, yet it seems
there is more to do and i can't do it alone.
i guess there is someone that has more experience with launchpad here? below
the error i get:
Rejecte
BTW the ubuntu0 branch is in our GIT upstream
http://code.dyne.org/index.cgi?url=frei0r/tree/&h=ubuntu0
i guess already imported in your bzr, should be easy to add a target for build,
no?
how?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscr
This same bug occurs in a freshly installed ubuntu 11.04.
GDM doesn't asks if the default should be changed and gdmsetup stays
grey, the unlock button does nothing, no access to the selection.
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => New
--
You received this bug notification becau
Further testing shows this bug occurs if gdmsetup is called from another
windowmanager (i'm using awesome here, still freedesktop compliant): the
privilege escalation program doesn't gets called to unlock the widget.
once unlocked gdm lets one change the default system-wide (for all
users), but no
the gdmsetup privilege escalation problem is only related to the awesome
window manager, not the default gnome or unity.
using gnome as desktop i could set the default session of my user.
so i guess i should put the candle back where it was and mark this bug
as expired.
ciao
** Changed in: gdm
ed in: frei0r (Ubuntu)
>Status: Fix Committed => Triaged
what does this means?
> ** Changed in: frei0r (Ubuntu)
> Assignee: jaromil (jaromil) => (unassigned)
why de-assign it?
I've fixed the bug already since long time.
I don't understand what is the workflow, w
Is there any versioning information of this libsecret?
Not having a test suite is hard to tell.
I'm running 0.18.5-3.1 from devuan ascii and will try to replicate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu
22 matches
Mail list logo