Subscribing.
--
rhythmbox crashes: assertion failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185462
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
I managed to find the cause of my problem. I had "Watch my library for
new files" selected in preferences. I'm not sure whether the samba
share was the problem, or whether it was the fact that I have many files
in my directory that are not music files and hence have no ID3
information (specifical
Is it possible this problem is not related to Rhythmbox and needs to be
reported to the GStreamer team? If so, who are they, and how would one
go about reporting it? Sorry for being so persistent about this, but
this problem is really annoying and is preventing me from using
Rhythmbox in any prac
I believe there has been a communication breakdown here. Please explain with
as much clarity and granularity as possible:
1) EXACTLY what process should be used to capture the error output.
2) EXACTLY what portion of the log you need to see posted here.
3) EXACTLY what else users experiencing thi
There were further comments, yet this hasn't been looked into.
** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
Rhythmbox:Error while saving song information:Internal GStreamer problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123460
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Here's some output from when the error actually happens.
(20:15:55) [0x805eed8] [rb_metadata_bus_handler] rb-metadata-gst.c:860: message
of type 64
(20:15:55) [0x805eed8] [rb_metadata_bus_handler] rb-metadata-gst.c:860: message
of type 64
(20:15:55) [0x805eed8] [rb_metadata_bus_handler] rb-metad
Also receiving same error. Here is the Rhythmbox -d output.
(11:31:11) [0x80fb408] [rb_debug_init_match] rb-debug.c:153: Debugging enabled
(11:31:11) [0x80fb408] [main] main.c:171: initializing Rhythmbox 0.11.2
(11:31:11) [0x80fb408] [rb_threads_init] rb-util.c:460: GMutex isn't recursive
(11:31: