[Bug 1924689] Re: Window border corruption after changing display scale between 100% and 200% in Xorg

2024-10-14 Thread Yao Wei
Something I've discovered so far: If the monitor is scaled up it has a chance that the active region and the background drawing region is unchanged, causing glitches like broken shadow, as well as unclickable UI elements outside the original box. This might have something to do with detecting cha

[Bug 2084229] Re: In Xorg, when changing display scale, window shadows have artifacts

2024-10-11 Thread Yao Wei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1924689 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924689 ** Summary changed: - In Xorg, when changing display scale, window shadow may have artifacts + In Xorg, when changing display scale, window shadows have artifacts ** Description changed: Under Xorg (Tes

[Bug 2084229] Re: In Xorg, when changing display scale, window shadow may have artifacts

2024-10-11 Thread Yao Wei
** Attachment added: "lp2084229-artifacts-change-scale.mov" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2084229/+attachment/5826984/+files/lp2084229-artifacts-change-scale.mov ** Tags added: jira-somerville-1137 oem-priority -- You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 2084229] [NEW] In Xorg, when changing display scale, window shadows have artifacts

2024-10-11 Thread Yao Wei
Public bug reported: Under Xorg (Tested NVIDIA GPU and Intel Graphics) Changing display scale in gnome-control-center causes artifacts on the shadow. [Steps to reproduce] 1. Enter GNOME Desktop in Xorg mode 2. Open Settings and another window 3. Change scale from from 1x to 2x and 2x back to 1x

[Bug 2076164] Re: List of "Scan new fingerprint" is incorrect when one or more finger is enrolled

2024-10-02 Thread Yao Wei
Tested on a unit that with gnome-control-center 1:46.0.1-1ubuntu7, the issue is reproducible. After updating the package to 1:46.4-0ubuntu0.24.04.1, this issue is no longer reproducible. Tested by enrolling all fingers and the enrolled fingers do not display in the "Scan new fingerprint" list. *

[Bug 2076164] Re: List of "Scan new fingerprint" is incorrect when one or more finger is enrolled

2024-09-18 Thread Yao Wei
Should we fix this issue by bumping minor version, or adding a patch to this package? I see 46.3 is in Noble at the moment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 2076164] Re: List of "Scan new fingerprint" is incorrect when one or more finger is enrolled

2024-08-16 Thread Yao Wei
** Description changed: [ Impact ]  * This issue causes other random fingers not able to enroll for authentication, once one or more fingers are enrolled. - * This issue is going to be fixed by SRUing minor updates of gnome- +  * This issue is going to be fixed by SRUing minor updates

[Bug 2076164] Re: fingerprint mismatch and disconnect with name

2024-08-14 Thread Yao Wei
ingerprint" are incorrect when one or more finger is enrolled ** Changed in: oem-priority Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: oem-priority Assignee: (unassigned) => Yao Wei (medicalwei) ** Summary changed: - List of "Scan new fingerprint" are incorrect when one or

[Bug 2076164] Re: fingerprint mismatch and disconnect with name

2024-08-06 Thread Yao Wei
from Bug #2076142: A known commit exists to fix this issue: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control- center/-/commit/3b7ea05d43c0dce4201279d5945488795b66bce7 ** Also affects: oem-priority Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: oem-priority ** Changed in: oem-priority

[Bug 2076142] Re: List of unenrolled fingerprint to add shows wrong fingers

2024-08-06 Thread Yao Wei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2076164 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076164 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2076164 fingerprint mismatch and disconnect with name -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 2076142] [NEW] List of unenrolled fingerprint to add shows wrong fingers

2024-08-05 Thread Yao Wei
Public bug reported: On gnome-control-center 1:46.0.1-1ubuntu7 in Ubuntu 24.04, the list of unenrolled fingers are wrong due to a filtering bug Reproducible steps: Enroll "Left ring finger" in a fingerprint-enabled system. Expected: The list in "Scan new fingerprint" hides "Left ring finger". A

[Bug 2067928] Re: The color of "Show Apps" icon should be same as the System Theme Color.

2024-06-03 Thread Larry Wei
I think the title has been described clearly enough, but.. (^_^) ** Attachment added: "202406040053.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2067928/+attachment/5785571/+files/202406040053.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2067928] [NEW] The color of "Show Apps" icon should be same as the System Theme Color.

2024-06-03 Thread Larry Wei
Public bug reported: The color of "Show Apps" icon should be same as the System Theme Color. ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell

[Bug 2045329] Re: The 'Files Selecting' window shows Asia fonts incompletely.

2023-11-30 Thread Larry Wei
** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2023-12-01 08-49-33.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2045329/+attachment/5725402/+files/Screenshot%20from%202023-12-01%2008-49-33.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 2045329] [NEW] The 'Files Selecting' window shows Asia fonts incompletely.

2023-11-30 Thread Larry Wei
Public bug reported: The 'Files Selecting' windows shows Asia fonts incompletely. Please view the image I uploaded of it. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10 Package: nautilus 1:45~rc-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-13.13-generic 6.5.3 Uname: Linux 6.5.0-13-generic x86_64 App

[Bug 2031872] [NEW] Support Elan fp device [04F3:0C99]

2023-08-17 Thread Yao Wei
Status: New ** Affects: libfprint (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Yao Wei (medicalwei) Status: New ** Tags: oem-priority originate-from-2025413 somerville ** Changed in: libfprint (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Yao Wei (medicalwei) ** Tags added:

[Bug 2019776] [NEW] If gnome-shell is started directly (instead of through gnome-session), it might deadlock with no output to the screen

2023-05-15 Thread Yao Wei
Public bug reported: If gnome-shell is launched directly instead of launched through gnome- session, the process spawning `ibus-daemon` might cause deadlock and unable to start the graphics. Since `ibusManager.js` checks whether service `org.freedesktop.IBus.session.GNOME.service` exists. In our

[Bug 1966635] Re: can't move file/directory by drag and drop by using touch monitor

2022-12-08 Thread Yao Wei
** Tags added: originate-from-1996036 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966635 Title: can't move file/directory by drag and drop by using touch monitor To manage noti

[Bug 1966635] Re: can't move file/directory by drag and drop by using touch monitor

2022-11-21 Thread Yao Wei
** Tags added: originate-from-1997210 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966635 Title: can't move file/directory by drag and drop by using touch monitor To manage noti

[Bug 1984147] Re: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with joined display on Wayland

2022-10-24 Thread Yao Wei
Verified that this issue is fixed in gnome-shell 42.5-0ubuntu1 Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 1984147] Re: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with joined display on Wayland

2022-10-18 Thread Yao Wei
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1984147 Title: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P)

[Bug 1984147] Re: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with joined display on Wayland

2022-09-14 Thread Yao Wei
This is the debdiff for gnome-shell 42.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 from jammy. We would like this to be included in -proposed before next weekend (2022-09-23), so I am doing SRU in spite of Salsa merge request. ** Description changed: - Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with jo

[Bug 1984147] Re: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with joined display on Wayland

2022-09-13 Thread Yao Wei
Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Yao Wei (medicalwei) ** Changed in: oem-priority Assignee: (unassigned) => Yao Wei (medicalwei) ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: New => In Progress ** Patch removed: "lp1984147.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source

[Bug 1984147] Re: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with joined display on Wayland

2022-08-30 Thread Yao Wei
The above MR is accepted upstream. ** Patch added: "lp1984147.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1984147/+attachment/5612602/+files/lp1984147.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gno

[Bug 1983717] Re: Monitor layout hotkey does not show single display options

2022-08-29 Thread Yao Wei
Note that https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome- shell/-/merge_requests/2056 is doing the opposite of the feature request. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983717 T

[Bug 1984147] Re: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with joined display on Wayland

2022-08-29 Thread Yao Wei
MR on upstream: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome- shell/-/merge_requests/2451 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1984147 Title: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P)

[Bug 1984147] Re: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with joined display on Wayland

2022-08-29 Thread Yao Wei
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Yao Wei (medicalwei) ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in

[Bug 1984147] Re: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with joined display on Wayland

2022-08-09 Thread Yao Wei
** Tags added: oem-priority originate-from-1981417 somerville -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1984147 Title: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on

[Bug 1984147] ProcEnviron.txt

2022-08-09 Thread Yao Wei
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1984147/+attachment/5607596/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1984147] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2022-08-09 Thread Yao Wei
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1984147/+attachment/5607595/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. http

[Bug 1984147] monitors.xml.txt

2022-08-09 Thread Yao Wei
apport information ** Attachment added: "monitors.xml.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1984147/+attachment/5607598/+files/monitors.xml.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1984147] ShellJournal.txt

2022-08-09 Thread Yao Wei
apport information ** Attachment added: "ShellJournal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1984147/+attachment/5607597/+files/ShellJournal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1984147] GsettingsChanges.txt

2022-08-09 Thread Yao Wei
apport information ** Attachment added: "GsettingsChanges.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1984147/+attachment/5607594/+files/GsettingsChanges.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 1984147] Dependencies.txt

2022-08-09 Thread Yao Wei
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1984147/+attachment/5607593/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1984147] [NEW] Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with joined display on Wayland

2022-08-09 Thread Yao Wei
Public bug reported: Monitor switcher popup (Super-P) is not displayed on desktop with joined display on GNOME 3 in Wayland mode [Reproduce Steps] 1. Use a desktop PC and start GNOME 3 in Wayland mode (therefore using NVIDIA GPU does not trigger the bug) 2. Connect the PC with 2 monitors 3. Use

[Bug 1963628] Re: Force IIO_SENSOR_PROXY_TYPE to iio-buffer-als for some Dell models

2022-03-31 Thread Yao Wei
Updating debdiff for focal to correct the bug number and use the upstream fix. ** Patch added: "iio-sensor-proxy_2.8-1ubuntu2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iio-sensor-proxy/+bug/1963628/+attachment/5575435/+files/iio-sensor-proxy_2.8-1ubuntu2.debdiff -- You received this

[Bug 1963628] Re: Force IIO_SENSOR_PROXY_TYPE to iio-buffer-als for some Dell models

2022-03-17 Thread Yao Wei
I'd like to add another debdiff to jammy which resolves the issue from the patch upstream Upstream MR: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/hadess/iio-sensor- proxy/-/merge_requests/355 ** Patch added: "iio-sensor-proxy_3.3-0ubuntu6.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iio-sensor-prox

[Bug 1963628] Re: Force IIO_SENSOR_PROXY_TYPE to iio-buffer-als for some Dell models

2022-03-04 Thread Yao Wei
This is debdiff for iio-sensor-proxy for jammy, which is also based on the same version in impish. ** Patch added: "iio-sensor-proxy_3.3-0ubuntu4.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iio-sensor-proxy/+bug/1963628/+attachment/5565596/+files/iio-sensor-proxy_3.3-0ubuntu4.debdiff -

[Bug 1963628] Re: Force IIO_SENSOR_PROXY_TYPE to iio-buffer-als for some Dell models

2022-03-03 Thread Yao Wei
This is debdiff for iio-sensor-proxy for focal ** Patch added: "iio-sensor-proxy_2.8-1ubuntu2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iio-sensor-proxy/+bug/1963628/+attachment/5565591/+files/iio-sensor-proxy_2.8-1ubuntu2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 1963628] [NEW] Force IIO_SENSOR_PROXY_TYPE to iio-buffer-als for some Dell models

2022-03-03 Thread Yao Wei
Public bug reported: We are encountering issues, that when enabling some Dell laptops, the readings from iio-poll-als are unstable, or could freeze on certain value. On these systems they have ENV{IIO_SENSOR_PROXY_TYPE}="iio-poll-als iio-buffer-als", and removing iio-poll-als makes reading stable

[Bug 1924689] Re: When changing screen scale in GNOME Xorg, gnome-initial-setup's window shadow should not be glitched

2021-07-06 Thread Yao Wei
Reported to upstream with stripped test case: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1875 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues #1875 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1875 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Deskt

[Bug 1934470] [NEW] gnome-initial-setup should detect screen scale change

2021-07-02 Thread Yao Wei
Public bug reported: gnome-initial-setup detects size-changed event on GdkScreen, but when screen scale is changed the resize event is not triggered, causing it not reevaluating the small screen detection. Replacing it with monitors-changed can resolve this issue. ** Affects: gnome-initial-setup

[Bug 1924689] Re: When changing screen scale in GNOME Xorg, gnome-initial-setup's window shadow should not be glitched

2021-06-29 Thread Yao Wei
** Summary changed: - When changing screen scale in X11, gnome-initial-setup's window shadow should not be glitched + When changing screen scale in GNOME Xorg, gnome-initial-setup's window shadow should not be glitched -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu De

[Bug 1924689] Re: When changing screen scale in X11, gnome-initial-setup's window shadow can be glitched

2021-06-29 Thread Yao Wei
** Summary changed: - Can see some garbage at the edge of the window after changing scale + When changing screen scale in X11, gnome-initial-setup's window shadow can be glitched ** Summary changed: - When changing screen scale in X11, gnome-initial-setup's window shadow can be glitched + When

[Bug 1924689] Re: Can see some garbage at the edge of the window after changing scale

2021-06-29 Thread Yao Wei
Tried modifying the source code of gnome-initial-setup, found that this issue cannot be reproduced, if the titlebar of the window (gis- assistant) is not set in the main (gis-driver) window. I think this issue can be worked around in gis-assistant, but the root cause might be either gnome-initial-

Re: [Bug 1876279] Re: Xorg freeze

2020-05-02 Thread Wei-Yao,Lin
I make a video of how I activate the bug, n the video the only key I press on the keyboard is "Esc". 20200502_160545_1.mp4 <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Q64RAKmqvtzsblIX4pFcGskaARzUU78_/view?usp=drivesdk> wei-yao Lin 於 2020年5月2日 週六 15:54 寫道: > I start active the bug at

Re: [Bug 1876279] Re: Xorg freeze

2020-05-02 Thread Wei-Yao,Lin
I start active the bug at 15:46 and then the bug happened, after that I press ctrl+alt+F3 to tty3 ,and I start type journalctl -b 0, and I PgDn to 15:46. And the picture I send you by the attachment Sebastien Bacher 於 2020年5月2日 週六 03:50 寫道: > Thanks, the shell log has no error, did you have the

[Bug 1876279] ProcEnviron.txt

2020-05-01 Thread Wei-Yao,Lin
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876279/+attachment/5364551/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1876279] ShellJournal.txt

2020-05-01 Thread Wei-Yao,Lin
apport information ** Attachment added: "ShellJournal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876279/+attachment/5364552/+files/ShellJournal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1876279] GsettingsChanges.txt

2020-05-01 Thread Wei-Yao,Lin
apport information ** Attachment added: "GsettingsChanges.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876279/+attachment/5364549/+files/GsettingsChanges.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 1876279] Re: Xorg freeze

2020-05-01 Thread Wei-Yao,Lin
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected package-from-proposed ** Description changed: I am the beginner with Linux and Ubuntu.And some Android habit that I can't give up . So I just try to classify my application with click on the button of "Show Application ", and drag all the Li

[Bug 1876279] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2020-05-01 Thread Wei-Yao,Lin
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876279/+attachment/5364550/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. http

[Bug 1755797] [NEW] Fcitx in Ubuntu 18.04 doesn't autoboot accidentally

2018-03-14 Thread Cui Wei
Public bug reported: I ensure that /etc/xdg/autostart/fcitx-autostart.desktop exists all the time and I didn't change any software/dependencies. However, after every system login, there is few times that fcitx is not auto-started, and I had to manually boot it via extra `fcitx` command in terminal

[Bug 1751417] [NEW] gtk3.22 makes gedit & pluma screen flash for short text only

2018-02-23 Thread Cui Wei
Public bug reported: Environment: Ubuntu 18.04 development branch; GTK-3 version: 3.22; For almost all gtk3-based text editor, such as gedit, pluma, mousepad. There is textview flashing issue when the textview doesn't have its side-scrollbar. Typically, short text in textview can make this condit

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-11-18 Thread Cui Wei
Thanks, when could this issue be to "fixed released"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614050 Title: Window depth order messed up To manage notifications about th

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-11-17 Thread Cui Wei
I keep using it till now and don't find anything wrong. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614050 Title: Window depth order messed up To manage notifications about t

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-11-02 Thread Cui Wei
I didn't find 3.18.7-0ubuntu0.2 in your ppa, have you updated it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614050 Title: Window depth order messed up To manage notificatio

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-11-02 Thread Cui Wei
Sure, waiting for your update in ppa. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614050 Title: Window depth order messed up To manage notifications about this bug go to: htt

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-11-02 Thread Cui Wei
If I use metacity with composite-manager disabled, mouse pointer mapping to object position messed up sometimes. For example, if I open a dialog, and I wanna click a button from that dialog, sometimes it's useless no matter how many times I clicked on it, the button seems not to be even pressed dow

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-11-02 Thread Cui Wei
I think metacity after 14.04 really goes into a bad state, is it possible to have a full refactor on it? I'll still choose to use marco- gtk3 temperarily. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-11-02 Thread Cui Wei
For comment #31, 'recommended' should be 'remembered' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614050 Title: Window depth order messed up To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-11-01 Thread Cui Wei
I still recommended what I had done when I had this issue (composite- manager is enabled): I opened a gnome-terminal, clicked "Help -> About GNOME terminal", then I see an about dialog belonging in front of me, then I clicked "Close" button at the right-bottom of this dialog to close it, but both

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-11-01 Thread Cui Wei
Oops.. I am using 3.18.7-0ubuntu0.1 and I have this issue again. I don't know whether this version is the updated one you said. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614050

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-11-01 Thread Cui Wei
Is the updated version 3.18.7-0ubuntu0.1 in xenial? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614050 Title: Window depth order messed up To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-10-25 Thread Cui Wei
I didn't find any messed up at the moment, and I suggest more persons to use and test on it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614050 Title: Window depth order messe

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-10-24 Thread Cui Wei
Hey, Alberts, what about the progress to port the fixed update to xenial source? Another question is that, are you confirmed that the issue only happened in composite mode? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in U

[Bug 1634004] [NEW] Fcitx conflicts with Ubuntu 16.04 Xlib (only happened on vncserver)

2016-10-17 Thread Cui Wei
Public bug reported: Please merge this update: https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx/commit/7018c686aab1e9c03495c7162c0c091d7afc1e75. Otherwise fcitx cannot be used in vncserver (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS xenial) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: fcitx 1:4.2.9.1-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-10-04 Thread Cui Wei
I am not sure whether it is indeed fixed without a long-term testing procedure, but I could say that didn't encounter this issue again after using it for 4-5 days. So at least, the ppa version with this patch is no-doubt more stable that the current one in ubuntu mainstream repository. -- You rec

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-10-04 Thread Cui Wei
Hi, metacity in Ubuntu xenial should apply for this patch as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614050 Title: Window depth order messed up To manage notificati

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-09-25 Thread Cui Wei
I recommend Alberts to use nemo 3.18 on ubuntu 16.04 and keep using for several days because I think nemo background is more possible to cover all windows than nautilus background under the management of metacity. Nemo 3.18 is only integrated with ubuntu 14.04. If it's hard to find a nemo repo for

[Bug 1614050] Re: Window depth order messed up

2016-09-25 Thread Cui Wei
I have to say that I have given up using metacity for nearly two months because I encountered this issue all the time since using it and cannot find a way to reproduce it intentionally. Instead, I am using macro:yakkety which is also based on GTK3 and it works well and stablely. I can confirm that

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-07-23 Thread Cui Wei
This NV Card (with Nouveau driver) also has window missing issue. #lsmod | grep NV 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF119 [GeForce GT 620 OEM] (rev a1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in

[Bug 1596574] Re: Cannot resize window by dragging the top edge

2016-06-29 Thread Cui Wei
Yes, metacity in Xenial doesn't get updated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596574 Title: Cannot resize window by dragging the top edge To manage notifications a

[Bug 1596574] [NEW] Cannot resize window by dragging the top edge

2016-06-27 Thread Cui Wei
Public bug reported: Bug Version: 1:3.18.4-0ubuntu0.3 Metacity running without composite manager. Users cannot resize window by dragging its top edge. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: metacity 1:3.18.4-0ubuntu0.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-24.43-generic 4.4.10 Uname

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-06-27 Thread Cui Wei
1) both of the output is 'Ambiance', and I figure out the differences: with Ambiance theme -> metacity have 1px-border to resize for left/right/bottom, 0px-border to resize for top; Marco have 1px-border to resize for left/right/bottom, 3px-border to resize for top; So it seems that Marco is mo

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-06-27 Thread Cui Wei
1) running Marco without composit manager is easy to resize window on all edges of a window (including top/bottom/left/width), and it seems the border to resize is about 3px - 5px. 2) modify theme will only work for CSD window. Apps such as gnome- terminal is still hard to resize 3) Metacity with

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-06-27 Thread Cui Wei
1) I can resize gedit/.. at the left/right/bottom edge of the window, but resizing is hard because 1px edge is too thing to catch. And I cannot resize them via the top edge of the window. 2) I am using Ambiance, without composit manager. 3) I have tried on serveral laptop (DELL/Acer/..) and all o

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-06-23 Thread Cui Wei
Still have most of the above issues. marco Package in Ubuntu Yakkety is using Gtk3 by default, and it works well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538111 Title: un

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-06-22 Thread Cui Wei
@Alberts, Hi, do you know why GUI applications (such as gnome-terminal/gedit) can't be resized when metacity is under "no-composite" mode? Can you fix it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bug

[Bug 1584277] [NEW] file-roller StartupNotify error in gnome-panel menu list

2016-05-20 Thread Cui Wei
Public bug reported: When opening "*.tgz" multiple times, gnome-panel is full of "Opening Archive ..". Please do the following change to fix it: [/usr/share/applications/org.gnome.FileRoller.desktop] 7c7 < StartupNotify=true --- > StartupNotify=false ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04

[Bug 1535184] Re: Is it reasonable to move "zenity" from "Depends:" to "Recommends:" for metacity package?

2016-05-18 Thread Cui Wei
It seems that missing zenity command won't make metacity fault. Temporarily, a better solution is to install a virtual package (with "Provides: zenity") by users themselves. So I thinks metacity needn't fix this issue actually! ** Changed in: metacity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- Y

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-05-18 Thread Cui Wei
Proprietary driver is a little complex to install due to dual Video Card. And I don't think the key point is nouveau because marco/metacity3.14/compiz don't have window missing issue. As for current metacity 3.18.4-0ubuntu0.1, window title shadow unerased when switching Tab-page still exists (#46

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-05-18 Thread Cui Wei
Hi, after upgrading to metacity 3.18.4-0ubuntu0.1. It will never crash. But window-missing issue still exists. I think window-missing issue only happens on NVDIA Card and using nouveau driver. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 1518780] Re: Metacity with composite rendering error for GUI menu border

2016-05-18 Thread Cui Wei
Well, this is an old problem when xenial is not released, but now fixed! ** Changed in: metacity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-05-06 Thread Cui Wei
@Alberts Muktupāvels Hi, metacity (as well as marco from mate) have same issue about displaying non-alphabet title, for example: mkdir -p ~/中中中 firefox ~/中中中 when firefox is not maximized, the titlebar region only displays around half of the text.

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-30 Thread Cui Wei
Another bug (let's call it Issue-5) that metacity 3.18 has while marco (no matter gtk2/grk3) doesn't has, is that some window is lacking rendering by metacity once it is launched from gnome-panel. Gedit always lack rendering. See the image which is using metacity 3.18.[any]. Replacing with marco

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-30 Thread Cui Wei
Due to marco depending on serveral mate package, you could try this version that build gtk3 directly, and compare the differences with metacity 3.18.4, considering the above 4 issues. sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ghostplant/testing sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get source gmarco -- You received th

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-30 Thread Cui Wei
3.18.3+git20160418-1ubuntu3 - This version contains all of these bugs: 1) the shadow of Charactors from Window title unerased; 2) Window missing bug; 3) /usr/bin/metacity Process Crash (I thought it doesn't crash before, but I think I am wrong because I met two crashes of this version) 4) When

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-24 Thread Cui Wei
click -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538111 Title: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-24 Thread Cui Wei
output under buggy state and "show-desktop-icons == true" ** Attachment added: "out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/1538111/+attachment/4645594/+files/out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to me

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-24 Thread Cui Wei
from "not show desktop icon" to "show desktop icon" ** Attachment added: "output.webm" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/1538111/+attachment/4645474/+files/output.webm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-24 Thread Cui Wei
/var/log/Xorg.0.log -> [ 35975.896] (II) modeset(0): EDID vendor "CMN", prod id 5568 [ 35975.896] (II) modeset(0): Printing DDC gathered Modelines: [ 35975.896] (II) modeset(0): Modeline "1920x1080"x0.0 151.60 1920 2010 2070 2220 1080 1086 1095 1138 -hsync -vsync (68.3 kHz eP) [ 36169.344] (II

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-24 Thread Cui Wei
I am currently under buggy state (nautilus + metacity 3.18.4), temperary using "DISPLAY=:0 gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.background show- desktop-icons false" to show other window now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-24 Thread Cui Wei
See recording of 3.18.4 ** Attachment added: "a.flv" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/1538111/+attachment/4645468/+files/a.flv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-24 Thread Cui Wei
@Alberts Hi, I strongly recommend to fix "edge shadow unerased" issue from 3.18.4 version, and upgrade metacity in xenial repository to 3.18.4. Because current 3.18.3-1ubuntu3 version is very easy to crash, though no window missing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1573925] [NEW] fix buggy style for nautilus on ubuntu 16.04 flashback (light-theme)

2016-04-23 Thread Cui Wei
Public bug reported: 1) Disable CDS style when XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP="GNOME-Flashback:Unity" 2) Show the menubar like it is shown under Unity Session. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: nautilus 1:3.18.4.is.3.14.3-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-generic 4.4.6 U

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-22 Thread Cui Wei
Hi, I met window missing just now, based on ppa version. But when I use Ctrl + Shift + I to debug, I found out that the debug window is also unable to display. Luckily, I was using nemo, so I switch to tty1 and run: DISPLAY=:0 gsettings set org.nemo.desktop show-desktop-icons false Then swi

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-22 Thread Cui Wei
Firstly, I didn't meet window missing bug with the ppa version till now, but I'm not sure whether it will happen several days later (Just like what I had said at #43, it took around 4-5 days to produce one window missing ..) Secondly, as for the new issue (title rendering problem), I can provide t

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-22 Thread Cui Wei
I am wondering what you changed in your ppa version. The window title looks strange when opening multiple tab-pages and switching among them. (See the image attached ..) ** Attachment added: "image.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/1538111/+attachment/4642494/+files/

[Bug 1538111] Re: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18

2016-04-18 Thread Cui Wei
Thanks, I'll try it tonight! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538111 Title: untraceable serious bug in metacity 3.18 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

  1   2   3   >