[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2010-09-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: yelp Importance: Unknown => Medium -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2010-04-17 Thread Matthew East
This is fixed in Lucid. ** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing l

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2010-04-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: yelp Status: New => Fix Released -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com http

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2009-09-09 Thread toobuntu
still a problem in karmic $ apt-cache policy yelp yelp: Installed: 2.27.4-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.27.4-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.27.4-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launc

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-10-01 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubunt

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-30 Thread Matthew East
The second type of link (docs called with relative path), which is the subject of the upstream report, is still broken in current gutsy. ** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The bug seems to be fixed, closing, feel free to reopen if you think there is still an issue though ** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-17 Thread albert
The desktop-effects link is now working. An omf file has been installed: /usr/share/omf/desktop-effects/desktop-effects-C.omf provided by ubuntu-docs 7.09.2. Yelp is still 2.19.90-0ubuntu3 -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-14 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: yelp Status: Unknown => New -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://l

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-13 Thread Matthew East
** Also affects: yelp via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396892 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assign

Re: [Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-13 Thread Matthew East
Hi, On 13/09/2007, Don Scorgie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are a couple of options at this point: > a) the omf's can be created. > b) I can cook up a (quick and dirty) yelp patch to check the existance of the > file path if the current ghelp method falls through Thanks for such a clear ex

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-13 Thread Don Scorgie
> My understanding was that the ghelp link should point to > /usr/share/gnome/help rather than requiring an omf file. There are > several documents we install which don't have omf files... Is that > seriously not going to be supported anymore? Not having omf files has several drawbacks: 1. The doc

Re: [Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-12 Thread Matthew East
On 12/09/2007, Don Scorgie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2 separate problems. > > First, the desktop effects: Is there a desktop-effects omf file? I > can't find one on my (gutsy) system. This means Rarian / Yelp doesn't > know where to look. (technically, it shouldn't have worked in previous >

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-12 Thread Don Scorgie
2 separate problems. First, the desktop effects: Is there a desktop-effects omf file? I can't find one on my (gutsy) system. This means Rarian / Yelp doesn't know where to look. (technically, it shouldn't have worked in previous yelps, but for a strange quirk in libgnome) Second, the relative

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-12 Thread Don Scorgie
2 separate problems. First, the desktop effects: Is there a desktop-effects omf file? I can't find one on my (gutsy) system. This means Rarian / Yelp doesn't know where to look. (technically, it shouldn't have worked in previous yelps, but for a strange quirk in libgnome) Second, the relative

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-10 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
Thanks for your report. ** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 138770] Re: fails to open valid links

2007-09-10 Thread albert
I can confirm this in Gutsy, yelp version 2.19.90-0ubuntu3 ** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- fails to open valid links https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact f