[Bug 148175] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN()

2010-09-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-power Status: Invalid = Expired ** Changed in: gnome-power Importance: Unknown = Critical -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148175 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 148175] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN()

2009-03-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
doesn't seems to be an issue anymore, closing this report please re open if you face the same issue with latest package on Jaunty, thanks in advance. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in

[Bug 148175] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN()

2009-03-04 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-power Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 148175] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN()

2008-10-14 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
Re-opening bug 279293 according to apport has a similar stacktrace with Intrepid ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Triaged -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148175 You

[Bug 148175] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN()

2008-03-13 Thread Ted Gould
I'm reclosing, because the upstream bug was reopened because someone is having it crash on Fedora. We do have patches to fix things that haven't been integrated into GPM mainstream (2.20) and likely Fedora. I'd be interested if someone on Ubuntu has it, but until then I'll just assume that we're