Strange, installing Flatpaks seems to work fine in 0.11.3-3 now (with
gnome-software 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.1 (the new version is a patch for
snaps from bionic-proposed, nothing to do with Flatpak I don't think)).
Glad that an Ubuntu dev is on it with keeping Flatpak up to date! :D
--
You
@Ads2, Yup I'm preparing an SRU for the next microrelease, you can
track in bug 1767215. I am able to use flatpakref's with 0.11.3-3, if
you are still having an issue please report upstream :-) (I have also
seen issues discussed as different browsers acting differently, or the
browser
I'm using 0.11.3-3 from the repositories, does 0.11.6 need to be SRU'd?
Since this is a new upstream microrelease that should be acceptable, if
someone wants to follow the process for making that happen:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
--
You received this bug notification
@Ad2, Are you using flatpak version 0.11.4 or 0.11.5 from the PPA ?
There was a regression which I found and reported here
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1632 where flatpakref's could
crash gnome-software. It has since been fixed and released in 0.11.6.
** Bug watch added:
This bug seems to have been re-introduced in Ubuntu 18.04 (GNOME
Software 3.28.1-0ubuntu4), should I file a new bug or re-open this one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
Ok, I'll give you medium. Enjoy!
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Artful)
Importance: Low => Medium
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug
For those wondering: I should've realized this much earlier, the
importance being 'Low' is not some sort of anti-Flatpak conspiracy, it's
because the bug satisfies the criteria for Low importance as per:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance
'Bugs that affect unusual end-user configurations or
@jbicha, sure reported an issue here to track the potential cache
upgrade issue with 3.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
software/+bug/1756098
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
Could you split the cache upgrade issue into a separate Launchpad bug?
We'll keep using this bug to track the clean install issue that only
affects Ubuntu 17.10.
** No longer affects: flatpak (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu Artful)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
On Ubuntu 18.04 daily with flatpak 0.11.3, gnome-software-plugin-flatpak
3.28.0 I have not been able to reproduce this issue. I did have a
separate issue, which looks like a bug in cleanups between versions of
gnome-software as removing all apps, remotes and caches resolved the
issue - I have
** Summary changed:
- Unable to install flatpak on Ubuntu artful
+ Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716409
Title:
Unable
11 matches
Mail list logo
