** Tags added: jammy lunar
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887252
Title:
config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
@Hongyi Zhao: As you wrote in the duplicate bug, my simplistic code in
comment #2, which only escapes the '<' character, would not be
sufficient. At the same time the issue I mentioned, about --no-markup
making \n being displayed literally instead of interpreted as a newline,
still stands.
Probabl
That looks like a better solution indeed, and I think I have got enough
of evidence that we should go for Sebastian's suggestion.
( Why didn't you mention that upstream discussion in your bug? ;) )
Thanks for your persistence! I'll make that change soon.
** Changed in: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
Statu
Change for gdm3 was pushed to git repo:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gdm/-/commit/03d610a4
lightdm has been uploaded with the change.
** Changed in: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
This bug was fixed in the package lightdm - 1.30.0-0ubuntu8
---
lightdm (1.30.0-0ubuntu8) lunar; urgency=medium
* debian/config-error-dialog.sh:
- Use --no-markup option in zenity call (LP: #1887252)
-- Gunnar Hjalmarsson Wed, 08 Feb 2023 22:29:55
+0100
** Changed in: light
This bug was fixed in the package gdm3 - 43.0-3ubuntu2
---
gdm3 (43.0-3ubuntu2) lunar; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/ubuntu/config_error_dialog.patch:
- Use --no-markup option in zenity call (LP: #1887252)
-- Gunnar Hjalmarsson Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:41:29
+0100
** Changed i
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 10:45 AM Daniel van Vugt
<1887...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> ** Tags added: jammy lunar
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (2005135).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887252
>
> Title:
> config-error-dial
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:15 AM Gunnar Hjalmarsson
<1887...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> @Hongyi Zhao: As you wrote in the duplicate bug, my simplistic code in
> comment #2, which only escapes the '<' character, would not be
> sufficient. At the same time the issue I mentioned, about --no-markup
>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:25 AM Gunnar Hjalmarsson
<1887...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> That looks like a better solution indeed, and I think I have got enough
> of evidence that we should go for Sebastian's suggestion.
>
> ( Why didn't you mention that upstream discussion in your bug? ;) )
Tha