[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-04-11 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
The same for me :) No gdm upgrade but something else, but don't know which package exactly but yes, xorg-driver-fglrx is installed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg-query -W xorg-driver-fglrx xorg-driver-fglrx 1:7.1.0-8-3+2.6.24.12-16.34 So maybe it's not about gdm but package xorg-driver-fglrx ?

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-04-11 Thread Joachim Haga
Again today, after dist-upgrade. But this time gdm was not upgraded, although xorg-driver-fglrx (which has atieventsd) was. I tried to look deeper into this, and it seems that in this case it is caused by atieventsd calling "xauth add/remove -f /home/xxx/.Xauthority" as root, which triggers the ow

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-04-08 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
So I've altered the status to confirmed since this problem affects other users too, it seems. For me, dist-upgrade often triggers this bug. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196464 You re

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-04-08 Thread Joachim Haga
I forgot to say: This also happened immediately after "aptitude dist- upgrade". A number of packages were updated, including gdm. -- After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-04-08 Thread Joachim Haga
I have seen the same problem (I do not know if it is related to GDM, but this is with hardy). At the moment it's particularly bad; .Xauthority reverts to root:root within a second of changing it by hand to user:user. It seems to be atieventsd which is the trigger of this (but possibly not the cau

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-04-03 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
And happened again. This time no screen lock just a simple apt-get update / upgrade. Then no X clients could be run. Again. .Xauthority was owned by the root user! After chowin'ing back to my user everything continued to work, it seems. -- After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run https://bugs.lau

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-03-13 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
And happened again! My home directory IS writable, no disk full issue. However I found this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo stat .Xauthority File: `.Xauthority' Size: 214 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: 802h/2050d Inode: 6996468 Links: 1 Access: (0600/

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-03-11 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
I have this issue again and again ... Yesterday I started dist-upgrade and lock the screen to have some coffee. When I returned I had the same issue I couldn't get the unlock password dialog, switching to text terminal I was able to correct the ownership of that /tmp/.gdm* file. After this move I w

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-03-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
switching to new, that doesn't seem to be a bug, something is changing the xauthority location usually that is the case when the user directory is not writable -- After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196464 You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-03-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
something makes gdm switch the xauthority there, not sure what, to debug by somebody having the issue -- After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-03-04 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
Ok, but if it's true that gdm should not using tmp, what's this in the output of strace (it's an example, now I run xterm)? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ strace -o /tmp/L xterm [...] access("/tmp/.gdmFV696T", R_OK) = 0 open("/tmp/.gdmFV696T", O_RDONLY) = 4 Since the file has "gdm" in its nam

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-03-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
could you run env and mount and copy the log to a comment? are you sure you have no disk issue? gdm should not be using tmp to store things and other software should not have to stat this one -- After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196464 You received this bug

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-03-03 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
Some files packed into a tgz file is attached. My home directory: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -ld ~ drwxr-xr-x 239 lgb lgb 20480 2008-03-03 09:06 /home/lgb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ whoami lgb (note: pidgin segfault can be seen in file 'dmesg' is already reported as #197146 by me, so ignore it here) Now

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-03-01 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Could you attach your gdm.conf-custom, .xsession-errors, Xorg.0.log, dmesg, messages and syslog? Is your user directory writable? -- After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-03-01 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
As I've mentioned I'm not sure that it's caused by gdm or gdm upgrade but this problem occurs on larger upgrades and at least it seemed for me that gdm can be the reason. However I'm only sure in the symptom: no X clients can be run at one point (as far as I remember after upgrades), trying to stra

[Bug 196464] Re: After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run

2008-03-01 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug report. Could you attach your gdm configuration and log to the bug? There should be no file under tmp used, are you sure you are running the ubuntu version? ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (deskto