[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: There is nothing at this point in gnome-screensaver to make it deserve be installed by default. Quite the opposite: the integration with the rest of the system makes it worthwile to have gss instead of xss. --

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: i also have the big problem that i cant reproduce it on *any* of my machines over here which makes testing while coding a bit hard. About five people reported this bug here (and possibly more reported duplicates).

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: sure thats what i do, but during coding i like to be able to type make, copy the binary in place and test it ... instead of building a package, uploading it and waiting for feedback ... its simply a lot more time

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 *** Bug 37043 has been marked a duplicate of this bug *** -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: Oliver, the last I heard about this was that you had identified the problem and the solution (gnome-screensaver needed to request a GL visual, or something along those lines). What's happened since then? -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Task: ubuntu gnome-screensaver Target: None = ubuntu-6.04 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: i'm trying to find a sane way to set the visual for GL screensavers its pretty tricky since g-s-s has no way to distinguish GL from non GL screensavers -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:48:37PM -, Oliver Grawert wrote: Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: i'm trying to find a sane way to set the visual for GL screensavers its

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: xscreensaver has a finer grained configuration for every single screensaver and supports setting the visual of the screensaver window for every single hack, gnome-screensaver is missing a feature to set the visual for the

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:56:59PM -, Oliver Grawert wrote: Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: xscreensaver has a finer grained configuration for every single

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: i doubt that it *hurts* but i'm not sure how it on systems where no GL visual is available at all (i'm not sure if X has sane fallback mechanisms for that if you force a visual) i also have the big problem that i cant

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 11:53:24PM -, Oliver Grawert wrote: Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: i doubt that it *hurts* but i'm not sure how it on systems where no GL

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: i'm totally aware of this (its one of my biggest nightmares actually) -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Comment: There is nothing at this point in gnome-screensaver to make it deserve be installed by default. Nothing works as it should. Let's revert to xscreensaver! Then, if gnome-screensaver improved very considerably during the

[Bug 22045] [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks.

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/22045 Summary changed to: [breezy+dapper] gnome-screensaver doesn't perform as well as xscreensaver with the same hacks. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com