Talk about zombies! This report is so old I couldn't even realize I was
the one who created it in the first place, until I read that information
above the comments.
I've now took the time to read all the comments again.
@Chris Billington: I really don't know what kind of drugs I was on when
I wro
On major problem with this search order is that it conflicts with the
order of files in Nautilius in the non-search view.
In my home folder I have 'thesis' and 'tmp' subfolders, and they are
shown in that order. I type 't' expecting 'thesis' to be the first
result so that I can hit enter and navig
A good example of the need to sort alphabetically, and not numerically.
I store a lot of bank statements in a folder. They have names like
this:
20090215_monthly_statement.pdf
200903_first_quarter_summary.pdf
20090315_monthly_statement.pdf
20090415_monthly_statement.pdf
20090515_monthly_statemen
you can open a new bug with a clear description of the issue and locale
you use if you still have an issue
--
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, whi
Could you stop copying the same comments on close bugs?
--
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing lis
Look,
3aa
4aa
20a
Is just BROKEN.
--
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Look,
3aa
4aa
20a
Is just BROKEN.
--
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists
I reply here only to the technical observations (assuming I'm the troll,
I avoid feeding myself...).
> the right way in my opinion to have it is by adding a new gconf key retaining
> current sorting behaviour by default, but
> *not* adding a new UI element in the nautilus preferences dialog.
Tha
If you're not a developer, you're always free to set a bounty in money
for others to implement; that'll foster development. It seems to me that
people complaining mistake "free as in speech" for "free as in beer",
and also take for granted that, just because a community exists, they
have to abuse i
Last words I tell about this issue:
I should have tried to search this feature request on b.g.o before, but
now that I've searched, I can tell it's simply false that no one is
asking for it:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547350
In particular see comment #4.
Do you still believe no o
> And I can tell you I don't want to pollute the preferences with options
> confusing and unneeded by most people.
You all have made me change my mind, and now I agree with you all on that issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-gnome2/+bug/326638
> However, you're trolling. It has
I'm not a nautilus developer, either. I'm an end user. And I can tell
you I don't want to pollute the preferences with options confusing and
unneeded by most people.
However, you're trolling. It has been clearly stated here that you
should either report this issue upstream or shut up. If you're to
> what an useful behaviour to have, why should other people send your
request to GNOME if they think they are wrong?
Because they are the maintainers.
I'm not asking for a lawyer to defend my interests, I'm suggesting a maintainer
could file the bug upstream because maintainers are already regist
> when you don't agree with them. That's called listening to users
requests.
then if upstream close the bug because they don't agree who should give
counter arguments? the bug triager who has no counter argument because
he's not the one who has an opinion on the topic?
--
sort order of files lis
> how would you call this option to be understandable though?
"Sorting" for example, followed by a list choice, including "Default" (the
current one), "Alphabetical" and eventually others. I'm not native english
speaker, nevertheless I find that quite understandable.
> they also learn that 11 is
what an useful behaviour to have, why should other people send your
request to GNOME if they think they are wrong?
--
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop B
@Sebastian:
"normal users" are not "stupid users", with few exceptions :)
"normal users" learn the alphabetical order at 6 y/o when they go to school,
it's not that hard to understand...
"normal users" would certainly use such an option, just like they use other
much less useful options for them,
> "normal users" are not "stupid users", with few exceptions :)
nobody says that users are stupid, how would you call this option to be
understandable though? do you think that's really somebody users want to
have to choice rather than something that should just work? adding
options for every requ
So I've headed bugzilla.gnome.org, and guess what?
"
Have a problem?
1. Create an account
"
Damn, I already have an account on Launchpad, I've already filed the
bug, but I have to create another account just to copy and paste my wish
onto bugzilla, because Ubuntu Desktop maintainers refuse t
I've just tried konqueror: version 3.5/debian uses alphabetical order,
version 4.1.4/intrepid (but not on kubuntu) behaves the same as
nautilus. I've no other versions to try. However I don't believe that
the behavior of any other piece of software, be it konqueror or others,
should be a reference
thank you for your bug report, that's not an option normal users would
use or understand though and you could add hundred of similars options
and make the configuration ununstable and non constitant between
configuration, closing the bug since that's not something the ubuntu
team will change agains
The current behavior is what most "developers" would expect.
It's always the same problem, end users needs are not respected at all
every time i need to sort elements in gnome, i have to switch to
konqueror or use ls
--
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.la
Well, since "years ago" things could change a bit if needed...
However I'm not asking for a fix, but I'm asking for an option to be
added in the preferences panel. I'd have rated this bug as "whishlist"
if I could.
Anyway, I personally know at least two people except me who do not
expect this beh
This was discussed years ago on the relevant mailing lists, and it was
chosen to be the intended behaviour. I don't think it will ever be
changed. Imagine saving a large number of screenshots, or using wget for
downloading some files:
for i in `seq 0 100`; do touch ${i}.txt; done
The current beha
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22078942/Dependencies.txt
--
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is s
26 matches
Mail list logo
