[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-07 Thread Dana Olson
Sometimes developers don't know what is best for their user base. But in this instance, I think the decision is fine. Xchat-gnome has issues in itself (removing features such as the clear chat buffer option, meaning I can't hit CTRL+L as I could before, and can in Gaim). I still use it currentl

[Bug 38694] Re: [Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-07 Thread Matthew East
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 14:34 +, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote: > Where was this discussed by the devs? I've just been back over the > ubuntu-devel list archives and I'm not seeing a 'let's remove xchat' > thread anywhere. As far as I know it wasn't discussed on the mailing list. It is likely that the di

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-07 Thread Ewan Mac Mahon
Where was this discussed by the devs? I've just been back over the ubuntu-devel list archives and I'm not seeing a 'let's remove xchat' thread anywhere. -- No XChat in Dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/38694 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Constantine Evans
I think the problem here could be solved if gaim were to improve IRC support. As it is now, gaim performs very poorly in large chatrooms, which is precisely the type of chatroom that Live Support will be using. There is a significant lag, it seems to use more resources, and there is no highligh

[Bug 38694] Re: [Bug 38694] Re: [Bug 38694] Re: [Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Matthew East
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 21:30 +, Peter Garrett wrote: > On Wed, 03 May 2006 13:40:24 - > Matthew East <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please bear in mind the code of conduct when phrasing further responses > > to this bug (this applies to those supporting either side of the > > argument). >

[Bug 38694] Re: [Bug 38694] Re: [Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Peter Garrett
On Wed, 03 May 2006 13:40:24 - Matthew East <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please bear in mind the code of conduct when phrasing further responses > to this bug (this applies to those supporting either side of the > argument). So far I haven't seen anything that even remotely breaks the code of

[Bug 38694] Re: [Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Peter Garrett
On Wed, 03 May 2006 13:13:04 - Andrew Conkling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since this has been discussed by the development team already, I'm closing this. If this is a reason to close the bug, then I fear for the future of Ubuntu as a community. Is the community supposed to meekly accept

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread michiel
I still find the rationale a bit skinny, personally. Like Andrew Conkling said, it's vital to have at least some way of connecting to IRC. Sure, GAIM does do this, but I don't understand how it isn't simply obligatory to include a program that specializes in providing access to a certain Interne

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Andrew Conkling
The Live Support spec helps the user "find their way to IRC" by making it almost completely automated. A user that wants to benefit from the extra bells and whistles of Xchat can install it instead of or in addition to Gaim. *An* IRC program is vital; I'll agree there. But using Gaim over Xcha

[Bug 38694] Re: [Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Matthew East
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 13:23 +, michiel wrote: > Really, what is the response when we say that > it's an extremely useful application that's > vital to the users being able to find their way > towards IRC when they need help? The response, as I understand it, is that IRC is not considered to be

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread michiel
Excuse me? Stop whining? We're raising valid points which you are not countering by the reasons the Ubuntu dev team might have had when they discussed this. Really, what is the response when we say that it's an extremely useful application that's vital to the users being able to find their way

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Andrew Conkling
I say y'all stop whining. If you want Xchat, you can install it. Gaim does IRC fine enough for use (it's all I use, actually), and it's a fine base client for those that don't use IRC often (whom Ubuntu is targetting AFAIK). We're not removing it completely, folks, just not installing it by de

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Bruno Dusausoy
I agree with people complaining about the removal of Xchat-Gnome. Gaim's IRC support is quite basic and it is clearly not the easiest (nor the most friendly) way to connect to IRC. Moreover, why should the Kubuntu users be able to use a "real" IRC client but not the Ubuntu ones ? Kopete and Konv

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Sander van Loon
One of the basic things I'd expect in a default install of a Linux desktop distro is a specialised IRC client, I don't really care about getting support for Ubuntu. It's a pity that XChat-GNOME has been removed, Gaim's IRC functionality just won't cut it. Please get it back in. Besides e-mail and i

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread michiel
I find that slightly bizarre. Since when is X-Chat as default program solely for people who "like IRC"? For one thing, it's about being able to give support to people. The Ubuntu channels are very well-populated and pretty much the easiest way for someone to quickly get help without having to re

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
I recently blogged [1] about this issue and explained why i think it's a bad idea to remove xchat-gnome. To resume : * The main argument for the removing of XChat-GNOME was that Gaim can be used for IRC chat and so it's redundant. Personally i don't like (and so don't use) Gaim for my jabber ch

[Bug 38694] Re: [Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-03 Thread Matthew East
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 02:25 +, Peter Garrett wrote: > How exactly is it a feature to expect people to use an app that isn't really > purpose-designed for IRC ? It's a feature that a good irc client has been removed from the distro, because irc is not a particularly common use case. MSN is muc

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-05-02 Thread Peter Garrett
Matthew East says: "I'm afraid this isn't a bug, but rather a feature." I'm intrigued by this. How exactly is it a feature to expect people to use an app that isn't really purpose-designed for IRC ? There are times when a new user is told to use certain commands in their IRC client that simply

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-04-21 Thread Brian Burger
hear, not here... must proofread bug-reports better! -- No XChat in Dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/38694 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-04-21 Thread Brian Burger
I'm re-opening this, because I'd really like to here from some of the developers or packagers about leaving XChat or XChat-Gnome out of Dapper. I've just spent a couple of hours using Gaim in Dapper Beta (LiveCD) and for basic IRC it has a fairly bad UI, and seems worse than XChat-Gnome would be

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-04-08 Thread Matthew East
Thanks for your report. The removal of xchat from Ubuntu was an extremely deliberate decision, and the advantages and disadvantages were debated at length by the development team. I feel sure that the points you mention were included in that debate. I'm afraid this isn't a bug, but rather a fea

[Bug 38694] Re: No XChat in Dapper

2006-04-08 Thread Eric Feliksik
Thanks for your bug. According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuLiveChatSupport , this is intended, and a Help-wizard will make it easy to get on #ubuntu with gaim. Of course, for further stuff (channels, servers) you might still want to use xchat, but if you really want to use IRC you'll prob