El jue, 18-05-2006 a las 10:57 +, nightshift escribió:
> I'm agreeing that it is much better if we replace the red and green
> dots with green ticks and red crosses. This way it is much clearer for
> people who suffer from color-blindness. It is indeed a significant
> number of people, and I th
El jue, 18-05-2006 a las 10:57 +, nightshift escribió:
> I'm agreeing that it is much better if we replace the red and green
> dots with green ticks and red crosses. This way it is much clearer for
> people who suffer from color-blindness. It is indeed a significant
> number of people, and I th
El jue, 18-05-2006 a las 10:57 +, nightshift escribió:
> I'm agreeing that it is much better if we replace the red and green
> dots with green ticks and red crosses. This way it is much clearer for
> people who suffer from color-blindness. It is indeed a significant
> number of people, and I th
El jue, 18-05-2006 a las 10:57 +, nightshift escribió:
> I'm agreeing that it is much better if we replace the red and green
> dots with green ticks and red crosses. This way it is much clearer for
> people who suffer from color-blindness. It is indeed a significant
> number of people, and I th
El jue, 18-05-2006 a las 10:57 +, nightshift escribió:
> I'm agreeing that it is much better if we replace the red and green
> dots with green ticks and red crosses. This way it is much clearer for
> people who suffer from color-blindness. It is indeed a significant
> number of people, and I th
El jue, 18-05-2006 a las 10:57 +, nightshift escribió:
> I'm agreeing that it is much better if we replace the red and green
> dots with green ticks and red crosses. This way it is much clearer for
> people who suffer from color-blindness. It is indeed a significant
> number of people, and I th