[Bug 455623] Re: Multiple parallel file copies to USB are slower than sequential processing

2010-02-26 Thread Yoav
Obviously that's a device limitation (assuming one of the devices is a hard disk), but sequential copying or timesharing with very large time slots (each file get a few seconds at a time for copying its contents) would avoid the problem never the less. -- Multiple parallel file copies to USB are

[Bug 455623] Re: Multiple parallel file copies to USB are slower than sequential processing

2009-10-19 Thread Fahim Abdun-Nur
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33966109/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33966110/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt

[Bug 455623] Re: Multiple parallel file copies to USB are slower than sequential processing

2009-10-19 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported, but feel free to report any other bugs you find. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)

[Bug 455623] Re: Multiple parallel file copies to USB are slower than sequential processing

2009-10-19 Thread Sebastien Bacher
copying several files in the same time is slower than copying in serie that's a device limitation not a bug -- Multiple parallel file copies to USB are slower than sequential processing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu