[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-24 Thread Joe Burmeister
Ok, had another chase to look. Brought in the rest of the debug symbols for the libs nautilus, and found the wonders of "apt-get source " The top of the stack missing from where I was before is: pid_get_command_line _gtk_mount_operation_lookup_info add_pid_to_process_list_store update_process_lis

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-25 Thread Sebastien Bacher
could somebody use apport to open the crash bug? -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desk

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-27 Thread Joe Burmeister
It is "pid_get_command_line" in gtkmountoperation-x11.c, but it's not "cmdline_contents" but "cmdline_len" that is the problem. "cmdline_len" is coming back from "g_file_get_contents" as 0. There is then the loop: for (n = 0; n < cmdline_len - 1; n++) and "n" and "cmdline_len" are unsigned.

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-28 Thread Random
Here's my 2 cents on this issue. I have a Sansa c250 mp3 player running Rockbox v 3.4. It has 2 Gb internal storage and a 4 Gb microsdhc card. The combination of Karmic stable and v3.4 of Rockbox is the first combo to recognize both (previously I had to eject the sd card and insert it into a sep

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-29 Thread Joe Burmeister
I no longer seam to be able to reproduce this. With or without apport. Maybe an update I didn't notice fixed it -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-12-06 Thread Adam Reeve
Why is this bug invalid? I'm experiencing the same problem on Ubuntu 9.10 64 bit. I'll try and post some more useful details later. -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-12-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
because a bug should be opened using apport -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-b

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-10-27 Thread Rocko
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34509610/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34509611/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: "usr_lib_nautilus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34509612/usr_lib_

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-10-28 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or challenging to deal with as a '.crash' file. Please follow these instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can be dealt with by the automat

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-10-28 Thread Rocko
Alas, there isn't a relevant crash file in /var/crash for nautilus. Might it be elsewhere? -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug ass

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-10-28 Thread Sebastien Bacher
did you activate apport as described and triggered the crash again after doing the change? -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug ass

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-10-28 Thread Sebastien Bacher
you can use gdb to get a stacktrace otherwise -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-10-28 Thread Sebastien Bacher
could you also give details on the device you eject there? -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-10-28 Thread Rocko
I was running the unstable (at least the RC) version of Karmic, so I assumed apport was running (it has been popping up with errors every now and again). But when I checked /etc/default/apport, it was disabled, so I have now enabled it. I did an lsusb -vv on the devices I am ejecting (see attached

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-08 Thread Chih Ho
I am using the latest Karmic image (as of Nov. 9, 2009) and still experiencing this exact issue whenever I try to use ''safely remove drive'. -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-08 Thread Chih Ho
Some correction to my last comment, it does not happen every time though. -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- deskt

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-21 Thread Joe Burmeister
I'm also seeing this. I seem to be able to reproduce it. Turn on the external USB drive. Open it in Nautilus to ensure it's mounted. Drop into the command (guake rocks!) and browse into a folder on the drive. Go to the desktop, select the drive and choice "Safely remove drive". BANG, the desktop ic

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-22 Thread Rocko
@Joe: I tried reproducing it that way, but when I try to safely remove a drive that gnome-terminal is accessing, nautilus tells me it's being used (by bash) and then asks if I want to unmount it anyway. (If I say yes, unmount it anyway, it pops up the same window telling me it's being used and do I

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-22 Thread Joe Burmeister
I tried gnome-terminal like you, and like you I see what I should. But using guake instead, it has crashed out everytime. -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu D

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-22 Thread Rocko
I can confirm that - I just tried guake and nautilus does segfault (and it doesn't unmount the drive) if guake's current working directory is in the drive being removed. -- safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462364 You received this bug n

[Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-22 Thread Joe Burmeister
Don't know if this helps, trying to get the source of glib2 that karmic uses, but here's the callstack I'm seeing when you crash Nautilus via "Safely Remove" on the drive in the "Computer" place. ?? ?? _gio_marshal_VOID__STRING_BOXED_BOXED /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.22.2/gio/gio-marshal.c 278 g_ty

Re: [Bug 462364] Re: safely remove drive causes segfault in libgobject and libXtst

2009-11-22 Thread Joe Burmeister
I tried gnome-terminal like you, and like you I see what I should. But using guake instead, it has crashed out everytime. 2009/11/22 Rocko > @Joe: I tried reproducing it that way, but when I try to safely remove a > drive that gnome-terminal is accessing, nautilus tells me it's being > us