I agree that setting noclobber would be useful.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
when doing a file copy nautilus should provide noclobber as a button
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63116
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
Thanks for your bug. What does "noclobber" is and would do?
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
Status: Confirmed => Needs Info
--
when doing a file copy nautilus should provide noclobber as a button
http
Use Case
If a directory had files foo1, foo3 fooN+1 but no foo2, foo4 foo5.
(Just to make the example work better, assume all files are big enough to call
for 20 seconds copying time, and it will cost you several minutes to restore
them all.
Jane happens to know all the files she wants are on fi
how is that different of the "skip all" option proposed by nautilus in
that case?
--
when doing a file copy nautilus should provide noclobber as a button
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63116
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop
Your bug lacks information we would need to investigate further. We
are now going to close the bug - please reopen if you have more
information at hand.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Rejected
--
when doing a file copy nautilus should provide noclobber as a button
