that's something to send upstream to bugzilla.gnome.org by someone
interested on the issue.
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
hm, this is still an issue in evince (except for paaguti's workaround).
is there hope to include this functionality in vanilla evince in the
future?
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Deskto
[Expired for evince (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
Get the files from http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1716268.
There is a shell which launches a python script to open evince through
the DBUS. The shell is basically useless if you integrate the editor
following the same XEDITOR syntax we all know and love from xdvi. Und
das wär's. I've test
And would you care to share you method with those of us who are not so
lucky?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18
Title:
evince doesn't include synctex support in
It's not an issue for me anymore. I have evolved some evince-synctex
Python scripts and I'm able to do backward searching from PDF to LaTEX
on almost any editor right now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubunt
Yes it is still an issue. Synctex support is here (maybe, couldn't
test), but only for calling from gedit. No way to use it with any other
latex editor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
** Description changed:
--
evince doesn't include synctex support in 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
Yeah, but the texworks editor is sooo poor when compared with my Emacs
macros built in years of use...
/PA
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:33:28 +
> From: 666...@bugs.launchpad.net
> To: paag...@hotmail.com
> Subject: [Bug 18] Re: evince doesn't include synctex support in 1
Oh, and an advice: rather than use Okular (which I have in the past),
try using texworks instead. It uses the same rendering engine as evince,
and lets you easily perform reverse-search.
--
evince doesn't include synctex support in 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18
You received this bu
Note also bug 656363
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/656363, it seems
that evince 2.32 is supposed to do quite a few things that it doesn't
really do in 10.10.
--
evince doesn't include synctex support in 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18
You received this bug not
11 matches
Mail list logo
