** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-desktop-team/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+git/gdm3/+merge/349818
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-desktop-team/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+git/gdm3/+merge/348784
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
** Changed in: gdm
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notificati
** Changed in: gdm
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notifications ab
This bug was fixed in the package lightdm - 1.12.3-0ubuntu1
---
lightdm (1.12.3-0ubuntu1) utopic; urgency=medium
* New upstream release:
- Fix pipe file descriptor leak for each greeter session. (LP: #1190344)
- Don't attempt generate D-Bus seat/session removal signals on sh
I have successfully installed and run lightdm 1.12.3-0ubuntu1 from
utopic-proposed. The behavior in case of a syntax error in ~/.profile
has changed in accordance with the test case in the bug description.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this
Hello Egon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lightdm into utopic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/1.12.3-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Ok, thanks, Daniel. This way I learned something new. :)
I think the reason for the confusion is that stderr is already
redirected when the code in ~/.profile is run. It's done through this
line in /usr/sbin/lightdm-session:
. "$CONFIG_FILE" 2>"$ERR"
So if you want it to work as before, you n
On 25.02.2015 23:42, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> Thanks for your comments!
>
> On 2015-02-25 19:56, Daniel Hahler wrote:
>> set -x
>> exec 1>>$logfile
>> exec 2>>$logfile
>
> Really using the "exec" command in ~/.profile would stop the execution
> of the main process (/usr/sbin/light
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your comments!
On 2015-02-25 19:56, Daniel Hahler wrote:
> set -x
> exec 1>>$logfile
> exec 2>>$logfile
Really using the "exec" command in ~/.profile would stop the execution
of the main process (/usr/sbin/lightdm-session), so I suppose your
~/.profile did not l
Thanks for working on this!
For what it's worth, I've been using the following, and had to move the
"set -x" now below the "exec 2>>$logfile", otherwise this was detected
as being an error.
1. I've been using the following in ~/.profile, mainly for debugging
purposes:
logfile=/tmp/debug-prof
This bug was fixed in the package lightdm - 1.10.4-0ubuntu2
---
lightdm (1.10.4-0ubuntu2) trusty; urgency=medium
* debian/config-error-dialog.sh:
* debian/lightdm-session:
- Use bash for the session to improve error handling (LP: #678421)
* debian/control:
- Depend on ba
This bug was fixed in the package gdm - 3.10.0.1-0ubuntu7.1
---
gdm (3.10.0.1-0ubuntu7.1) utopic; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/ubuntu_config_error_dialog.patch:
- Show warning dialog in case of error in ~/.profile etc. and
don't let a syntax error make the login fail (L
Thanks Tim, with that all the SRUs have been verified at last. :)
** Tags removed: verification-done-trusty verification-needed-utopic
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
htt
I verified gdm on utopic with both a valid and broken .profile, all
working as expected
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profi
This bug was fixed in the package gdm - 3.10.0.1-0ubuntu3.1
---
gdm (3.10.0.1-0ubuntu3.1) trusty; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/ubuntu_config_error_dialog.patch:
- Show warning dialog in case of error in ~/.profile etc. and
don't let a syntax error make the login fail (L
Sorry, misunderstanding. I restored the previous tags, which seem to be
correct.
** Tags removed: verification-done
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty verification-needed-utopic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm
** Tags removed: verification-done-trusty verification-needed-utopic
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a f
** Tags removed: verification-done-utopic-lightdm verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-needed-utopic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error messa
Thanks for the correction, Brian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notifications about this bug go t
@Gunnar - the SRU team tools understand the tags v-done and
v-done-$release, but not v-done-$release-$package.
** Tags removed: verification-done-trusty-gdm verification-done-trusty-lightdm
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
gdm 3.10.0.1-0ubuntu3.1 was successfully installed and run by Magnus
Ewert. Magnus confirms that the behavior in case of a syntax error in
~/.profile has changed in accordance with the test case in the bug
description.
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty-gdm verification-done-trusty-
lightdm v
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/utopic-proposed/gdm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notifications about
Hello Egon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gdm into utopic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/3.10.0.1-0ubuntu7.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
** Changed in: gdm (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notificat
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #774798
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774798
** Also affects: gdm (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774798
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you a
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/trusty-proposed/gdm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notifications about
Hello Egon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gdm into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/3.10.0.1-0ubuntu3.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj)
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu Utopic)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu Utopic)
Assignee: (una
** Branch linked: lp:~gunnarhj/ubuntu/utopic/gdm/config-error-dialog
** Branch linked: lp:~gunnarhj/ubuntu/trusty/gdm/config-error-dialog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/6
This bug was fixed in the package gdm - 3.14.0-0ubuntu2
---
gdm (3.14.0-0ubuntu2) vivid; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/ubuntu_config_error_dialog.patch:
- Show warning dialog in case of error in ~/.profile etc. and
don't let a syntax error make the login fail (LP: #67842
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/vivid-proposed/gdm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notifications about
** Branch unlinked: lp:lightdm/1.10
** Branch unlinked: lp:lightdm/1.12
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To m
I have successfully installed and run lightdm 1.10.4-0ubuntu2 from
trusty-proposed. The behavior in case of a syntax error in ~/.profile
has changed in accordance with the test case in the bug description.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/trusty-proposed/lightdm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notifications a
Hello Egon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lightdm into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/1.10.4-0ubuntu2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
This bug was fixed in the package lightdm - 1.13.0-0ubuntu2
---
lightdm (1.13.0-0ubuntu2) vivid; urgency=medium
* debian/config-error-dialog.sh:
* debian/lightdm-session:
- Use bash for the session to improve error handling (LP: #678421)
* debian/control:
- Depend on bas
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/vivid-proposed/lightdm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notifications ab
** Branch linked: lp:~gunnarhj/lightdm/config-error-dialog_utopic
** Branch linked: lp:~gunnarhj/lightdm/config-error-dialog_trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
I filed a merge proposal, where lightdm-session is run under bash and
the code for exception handling improved. A vivid build of lightdm,
including the proposed changes, is available in my PPA at
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/misc
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: F
** Branch linked: lp:~gunnarhj/lightdm/config-error-dialog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notifica
Hah, nice! Works for me, too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
Thanks for looking at it, Martin.
Actually I may have found a relatively trivial solution using trap();
please see attached diff.
** Patch added: "possible-fix.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/lightdm/+bug/678421/+attachment/4263541/+files/possible-fix.diff
--
You rece
On Nov 18, 2014, at 02:41 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>Bash's input redirection simply is way more powerful. Granted, bash
>takes a tad longer to start up, but any tee or other external program
>which you call in addition will probably hurt performance just as much.
Purely selfishly, switching back t
> . "$CONFIG_FILE" 2>"$ERR"
> OTOH, I suppose that switching to bash wouldn't be approved just like that. ;)
Bash's input redirection simply is way more powerful. Granted, bash
takes a tad longer to start up, but any tee or other external program
which you call in addition will probably hurt perf
I have been googling and experimenting a bit. Basically I'd like to
change:
. "$CONFIG_FILE" 2>"$ERR"
to something along these lines:
. "$CONFIG_FILE" 2> >(tee "$ERR" >&2)
There is just one tiny problem: It's bash syntax and doesn't work in sh.
If I change the shebang line of /usr/sbin/ligh
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lightdm
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/utopic-proposed/lightdm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.prof
On 2014-11-15 00:49, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:38 PM, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
>> Right now I don't know how to best deal with this issue. Any
>> advice appreciated.
>
> Probably use tee(1) to get the output both into the temp file and
> ~/.xsession-errors.
Yeah.. But I fear
On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:38 PM, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
>Right now I don't know how to best deal with this issue. Any advice
>appreciated.
Probably use tee(1) to get the output both into the temp file and
~/.xsession-errors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
I created the file /etc/profile.d/wrong.sh with a sh syntax error. With
lightdm 1.12.1-0ubuntu1 the reason for the login failure is logged in
~/.xsession-errors, but with the latest lightdm version it's not. So
there is a regression with the fix of this bug.
The reason is that stderr is temporaril
On Nov 14, 2014, at 09:59 PM, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
>I don't know. Syntax errors directly in e.g. ~/.profile or /etc/profile
>are logged in ~/.xsession-errors both with the latest lightdm version
>and with previous versions, but I don't know whether syntax errors in
>files which are sourced fr
On 2014-11-14 21:45, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 08:15 PM, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
>> Being thrown back indicates a syntax error.
>
> Are those errors logged anywhere permanently?
I don't know. Syntax errors directly in e.g. ~/.profile or /etc/profile
are logged in ~/.xsession-err
On Nov 14, 2014, at 08:15 PM, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
>Being thrown back indicates a syntax error.
Are those errors logged anywhere permanently?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
On 2014-11-14 20:43, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Sure, it's entirely possibly that my login has been silently ignoring
> the non-sh syntax errors, so in that respect, getting notification of
> them now is a good thing.
The use of commands unknown to sh is one kind of error that was silently
ignored. How
Being thrown back indicates a syntax error. One thing you could do is
testing each one of your sourced files like this:
sh -n
The files must pass that test, or else you won't be able to log in.
This is what the new lightdm code does, but it does not work
recursively...
--
You received this bu
Hi Gunnar.
On Nov 14, 2014, at 07:07 PM, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
>It has always been using Bourne shell, so "source" is not understood.
>You have obliviously been running your system without the configuration
>in those other shell files.
Sure, it's entirely possibly that my login has been sile
Hi Barry!
On 2014-11-14 17:56, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> So, when I log in, I do get several warnings in a dialog. Most are
> because I use `source` instead of `.` to source other shell files.
> What shell is lightdm using these days?
It has always been using Bourne shell, so "source" is not unders
For now I'll keep the hold on lightdm, but if Robert or someone else
wants to debug in real-time, ping me on irc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error mes
pay-service crashed, leaving a core file and the following in
.xsesssion.old. Not sure if this is related.
upstart: pay-service main process (6149) killed by ABRT signal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
Hmm, as 1.13.0-0ubuntu1 just showed up in vivid, it broke my login in
the follow way. Note that I always try devel channel updates in a VM
with a snapshotted disk so I'm able to revert and do some further
investigating. Looking at the dist-upgrade packages, I suspect the
lightdm changes are affec
apt-mark lightdm hold && apt-get dist-upgrade && reboot
Indeed, logins are fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile scr
I have successfully installed and run lightdm 1.12.2-0ubuntu1 from
utopic-proposed. The behavior in case of a syntax error in ~/.profile
has changed in accordance with the test case in the bug description.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this
Hello Egon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lightdm into utopic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/1.12.2-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wik
This bug was fixed in the package lightdm - 1.13.0-0ubuntu1
---
lightdm (1.13.0-0ubuntu1) vivid; urgency=medium
* New upstream release:
- Fix crash when having configuration keys defined in multiple places
(LP: #1377373)
- Fix pipe file descriptor leak for each session
I've removed the tasks on LightDM (the project) as the fixes for this
were all in debian/.
** No longer affects: lightdm/1.12
** No longer affects: lightdm/1.10
** No longer affects: lightdm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscri
** Changed in: lightdm
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
** Branch linked: lp:~gunnarhj/ubuntu/vivid/gdm/config-error-dialog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage
** Changed in: gdm
Status: Unknown => New
** Changed in: gdm
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a f
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #738970
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738970
** Also affects: gdm via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738970
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Branch linked: lp:lightdm/1.10
** Branch linked: lp:lightdm/1.12
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manag
** Changed in: lightdm/1.10
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: lightdm/1.12
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Branch linked: lp:~gunnarhj/lightdm/lp-678421-trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notificatio
** Branch linked: lp:~gunnarhj/lightdm/lp-678421-utopic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notificatio
** Description changed:
+ trusty and utopic SRU requests
+ ==
+
+ [Impact]
+
+ In case of a syntax error in either of ~/.profile or a few other similar
+ files, the Xorg login is interrupted, and the user is taken back to the
+ login screen without an explanation. Deb
** Also affects: gdm (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: lightdm (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gdm (Ubuntu Utopic)
Importance: Low
Status: Triaged
** Also affects: lightdm (Ubuntu Utopic)
Importa
** Changed in: lightdm
Milestone: None => 1.13.0
** Changed in: lightdm
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: lightdm
Importance: Medium => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https:/
Gunnar,
Running it through "sh -n" is definitively a good way how to test a
shell script. It of course will miss a lot of errors (variable typos,
failing programs in a set -e script, etc.), but it at least will catch
obvious syntax errors. So ignoring faulty scripts and showing some error
message
It seems it's a good way to fix this bug!
Thank you for your help :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To man
I made a try.
As regards a syntax error, it currently results in an interrupted login,
while other types of errors are silently ignored.
With my new merge proposal, a zenity/kdialog dialog is shown for all
types of errors in ~/.profile and friends, and the login is completed
(with a deficient con
And I who thought it was so elegant to fix this bug with a few
characters of code. ;)
I suppose we could do a solution with zenity/kdialog, but before
spending time on such a proposal (involving gettext etc.), I would like
to know for sure that "sh -n" is an acceptable testing method. (Please
note
I think we would also prefer a dialog, but I will take errors in
~/.xsession-errors over nothing. We can instruct our support staff to
look there for these errors; right now there are no errors anywhere and
so it is difficult to debug the root cause of the problem.
-A
--
You received this bug no
Hi Gunnar,
> It would make the file not being loaded in case of a syntax error, and
an entry printed to ~/.xsession-errors.
I don't know if it's better to ignore this file in case of syntax errors
or to refuse to start a new session but for me, the most interesting
thing is to notify the user wha
Hi Matthieu,
That "sh -n" option sounds interesting indeed, and I just prepared a
merge proposal for lightdm. It would make the file not being loaded in
case of a syntax error, and an entry printed to ~/.xsession-errors.
** Changed in: lightdm
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: lig
** Branch linked: lp:~gunnarhj/lightdm/lp-678421
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage notifications abou
Hello,
I also confirm that this bug can still be annoying with the latest versions of
GDM and LightDM :-)
And it can be an easy way to make some jokes just by modifying the .profile!
Then it will be hard for the user to understand why he can no longer start a
new session.
Is it maybe possible
Marked bug #1097903 a duplicate of this one, and added a lightdm
(ubuntu) task.
** Also affects: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You rec
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678421
Title:
Error message for a faulty ~/.profile script
To manage not
88 matches
Mail list logo
