This bug was fixed in the package accountsservice - 0.6.13-1
---
accountsservice (0.6.13-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release:
- honor aclocal flags environment variable
- set log domain so it can be hushed
- use wtmp instead of consolekit for determining logi
** Also affects: accountsservice (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Low
Status: Fix Committed
** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Low
Assignee: Canonical Desktop Team (canonical-desktop-team)
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this bug notificatio
** Branch linked: lp:debian/accountsservice
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810907
Title:
User Accounts applet is too basic and needs advanced settings
I will sync it thanks
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810907
Title:
U
And, of course, the package builds fine in Oneiric:
http://debomatic64.debian.net/oneiric/pool/accountsservice_0.6.13-1/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81
Well, accepted in Debian.
Could anyone have a look and possibly sync it from unstable?
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Alessio Treglia (quadrispro) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug no
Uploaded to Debian sid, I'm waiting to see it published.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810907
Title:
User Accounts applet is too basic and needs advan
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Alessio Treglia (quadrispro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-
Thanks, the current practical issue is the sh one but using adduser will
probably avoid other similar integration issues later on
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
OK, I'll go ahead patching the sources.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810907
Title:
User Accounts applet is too basic and needs advanced settings
To
We discussed that with serveral people and Colin Watson and some others
suggested still to use adduser on Debian,Ubuntu system, there is a
reason why Debian recommends in the useradd manpage to use this one, it
will do extra checking and has better integration with the distribution
--
You receive
Sebastien,
I'm working on the new upstream release of accountsservice (I think I'll be
able to upload the new package to unstable tomorrow), you can see the progress
here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/accountsservice.git
If customizing the login shell is the point, I think r
Sebastien,
yes, I intend to properly fix this as soon as possible.
A bug in BTS would be appreciated though.
Please note I'm in a sort of vacancy-mode these days, I'll be back in
action Monday.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subsc
Also, accountsservice is in collab-maint, and as the useradd->adduser
change is equally important for Debian, we can just do the change
ourselves.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://
Please don't put users into "dialout", "cdrom", and "plugdev", these
groups are really obsolete. ubiquity should stop using these groups,
too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
the default ubiquity created users is added to those groups "username
adm dialout cdrom plugdev lpadmin admin sambashare", the admin profile
should probably match those
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-cent
ok, the issues are mostly in accountsservice, one fix to the default
shell issue would be to switch adduser instead of useradd (the useradd
manpage itself recommends to use adduser on Debian). Alessio, I noticed
that you are subscribed to launchpad bugs, is that something you want to
do in Debian?
Chris Coulson [2011-07-19 9:20 -]:
> Also, the example of using groups to control device access is pretty
> much obsolete now, as this is mostly done using ACL's with udev-
> acl/consolekit, rather than using unix groups - I don't even think the
> fax group is used anymore (there is no udev ru
Also, the example of using groups to control device access is pretty
much obsolete now, as this is mostly done using ACL's with udev-
acl/consolekit, rather than using unix groups - I don't even think the
fax group is used anymore (there is no udev rule which sets device nodes
to that group name)
Thanks for the reply
> 1. Group management and groups membership
That's a bug, a new added user should be part of the standard needed
groups, we need to build a list of those (using what the old tools was
doing would be a start) and change the standard and admin profiles to
match what is needed
1. Group management and groups membership
A newly created user is only member of its own group
$ id test02
uid=1003(test02) gid=1003(test02) groups=1003(test02)
John, a not so powerful adminof his home sytem, wants to access his
modem or fax for example? Or any other devices based on group
members
Could you describe in which situation a normal user would need those?
The dialog has a support for profiles, i.e an user can be a normal user
or an admin one, those profiles should handle most of the needs,
especially if the sysadmin can add custom profiles. Is there a real need
to modify the user
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810907
Title:
User Accounts applet is too basic and needs advanced settings
To manage notifications about this bug go to
23 matches
Mail list logo