>Bug 306672 is about update-manager grabbing focus too often, By the
>looks of this bug it doesn't grab focus unless told to?
Not correct. Update-manager grabs focus inappropriately, and it needs
to be fixed.
Update-manager steals focus whenever it creates a window. The fix is
to change the focus
On 12/11/2008 07:27 AM, Andrew Conkling wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Loye Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Obviously, it's not a small, simple fix."
>>
>> Contrary to Sarah's assertion, setting "focus_on_map" to "false" in
>> every instance it appears in update-manager *fixes*
> So could you provide a patch so others can test?
Somebody else will have to run with the ball on that.
--
'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress
dialogs steal focus
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35876
You received this bug notification because you are a me
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Loye Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Obviously, it's not a small, simple fix."
>
> Contrary to Sarah's assertion, setting "focus_on_map" to "false" in
> every instance it appears in update-manager *fixes* update-manager:
> Update-manager ceases to steal focus
[banging head on desk]
Update-manager doesn't get focus randomly. It has to ask for it. The
window manager (metacity) just does what it's told to do. Anything the
window manager does to prevent focus-stealing is a sub-optimal
solution, but it's a necessary one when applications are written
egocent
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Loye Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, the problem isn't metacity. The problem is that update-manager
> should not ask for focus in the first place. This is a problem that
> has been solved over and over again in other applications.
This is known already. Se
> Please don't assign to ubuntu-core-dev, really.
I meant to. Really.
> It sends a mail to all
>core-devs (including those who don't work on update-manager...).
That's a Good Thing (tm). I knew what I was doing and what the effects
would be.
> There is no need to take any further action in
> or
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:34:29PM -, Loye Young wrote:
> Daniel, unless you know of someone else to fix this, the maintainer of
> the package is the right person. In this case, the maintainer is ubuntu-
> core-dev.
I'm afraid that is not the right way to respond to this bug report. It is
alr
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:30 PM, dbsoundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Andrew, I was citing the effects of the problem just as an
> example, the main issue is indeed just that the windows steal the focus.
> For me, that sets off that chain reaction, because of my not-so-fast
> processor. I
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:45 PM, dbsoundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I experience in Hardy, no compiz. It is very annoying, because I have
> the "normal" desktop effects enabled, which is generally stable on my
> system, but my processor is an Athlon XP, so when I'm multi-tasking (as
> always),
10 matches
Mail list logo
