** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739126
Title:
gsettings-data-convert cra
That was a known issue that got fixed. Closing this bug. Thanks!
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks, as per your last comment, I am closing this bug.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
Honestly, that doesn't look like exactly like the same type of
corruption I was seeing, and I haven't seen corruption come back since
I've disabled /apps/metacity/general/capture_before_unmap...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscr
This is what I was doing to test:
1- On workspace 1, open firefox, and three terminals. Try and stagger windows
2- Do the same on workspace 2
3- for 10 minutes, switch between workspaces, and switch between windows
One of the first things to corrup was the garbage can icon in the botton
left, and
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xchat-gnome
I've recently switched from xchat to xchat-gnome, and now have a
limitation on the number of auto-join channels I can have. Although the
channels are listed properly in ~/.xchat2/servlist_.conf, xchat's
src/common/servlist.c seems to be limiti
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751925
Title:
limits number of autojoin channels
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
So, there is another limit, set by CHANLEN in xchat.h being set to 300.
That limit is in xchat also, so doesn't impact people like me who have
switched from xchat to xchat-gnome.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gn
actually, I take that back, recent xchat versions don't have the 300
character limitation anymore...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751925
Title:
limits number
Could it be the fact that both my laptops have high resolution screens?
one is 1920x1080 and the other is 1680x1050...
I'm not quite sure why you aren't able to reproduce it.
@Michael Vogt: do you have a reliable way of reproducing it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
SRU Request for Lucid and Maverick:
Impact: Unexperienced users can set default file handler for directories
to some random application, rendering unexpected results.
How to test:
- Right click on directory
- Select "Open with other application"
- Make sure option "Remember this application for
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution
In natty, when you create a new user, the evolution calendar alarm
notification default to using the system tray.
Steps to reproduce:
1- Create a new user
2- Login in as new user
3- open gconf-editor and look at
/apps/evolution/calendar/notify
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757805
Title:
evolution calendar notification defaults to use tray
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757805
Title:
evolution calendar notification defaults to use
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
After installing today's natty iso, the universal access icon is
broken/missing on the gdm login screen. In it's place is the "broken
icon" image.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: gdm 2.32.1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759927
Title:
universal access icon broken on login screen
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
Yes, this seems to be resolved now. Thanks!
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689835
Title:
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #637222
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637222
** Changed in: evolution
Importance: Undecided => Unknown
** Changed in: evolution
Status: New => Unknown
** Changed in: evolution
Remote watch: None => GNOME Bug Tracker #637222
--
Yo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
I am seeing this also, on amd64.
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
@itismike: was this on karmic, or on maverick?
How do you suspend? By closing the lid, or with Indicator Applet
Session?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/51
NACK on 2.28.3-0ubuntu10.1 in -proposed.
Mailing lists and expanded contact list in email header still show the
issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229187
Title:
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 49579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 643055
screen saver does not 'time in' when the mouse is located on the top left
Menu
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 49579
screen doesn't lock w
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 632412 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632412
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 632412
Windows 2 rows shorter than it should be
* You can subscribe to bug 632412 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-ter
I see this in natty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632412
Title:
Windows 2 rows shorter than it should be
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.
Apparently, the root issue is rhythmbox does not implement the root
mpris spec correctly. The Desktopentry prop on the root interface should
contain the name of the desktopfile minus the .desktop suffix. Rhythmbox
exposes the full path to the file.
** Also affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
Importance
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
@NoOp: this bug is closed. Please open a new bug for your issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631980
Title:
[SRU] gnome-keyring doesn't unlock ssh key
--
SRU Request:
Impact: links in email do not decode properly, in particular the ones
from eBay.
This has been addressed by backporting a minimal fix from trunk, see the
debdiff in comment #16.
I have uploaded packages to lucid-proposed. I will upload packages to
maverick-proposed once the current
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. Your bug report is more likely to get attention if it is made in
English, since this is the language understood by the majority of Ubuntu
developers. Additionally, please only mark a bug as "security" if it
shows evid
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for your comments. This does not appear to be a bug report and we
are closing it. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but it
would make more sense to raise your question in the support tracker.
Please visit https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+addquestion
** Visibility changed t
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Can you reproduce this issue at will?
Does it reproduce with desktop effects disabled?
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is sub
Thanks for your comments. This does not appear to be a bug report and we
are closing it. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but it
would make more sense to raise your question in the support tracker.
Please visit https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+addquestion
** Visibility changed t
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Packages with the debdiff in comment #29 have been pushed to maverick-
proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611983
Title:
[SRU] Evolution [Open Link In Browse
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 698131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698131
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 698131
[Natty] New glib2.0_2.27.90-0ubuntu1 crashes gnome-panels
* You can subscribe to bug 698131 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
I see this also. Nvidia on amd64.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698131
Title:
[Natty] New glib2.0_
FYI, There's a stack trace in #698139
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #638838
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=638838
** Also affects: glib via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=638838
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notifica
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. Your bug report is more likely to get attention if it is made in
English, since this is the language understood by the majority of Ubuntu
developers. Additionally, please only mark a bug as "security" if it
shows evid
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390989
Title:
Locked screen shows the desktop
--
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for reporting this.
Could you please give detailed steps on how to reproduce this issue?
Does the issue occur if desktop effects are disabled?
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notificati
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for reporting this issue, but I don't understand why you feel
turning off the preview pane would improve security.
Could you please elaborate on this issue?
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notif
Outlook uses Internet Explorer as its renderer for HTML email. Disabling
the preview pane in Outlook would prevent it from rendering HTML mail
with the Internet Explorer engine which contained multiple security
issues.
Applying the same logic to a completely different application, such as
Evolutio
I have successfully verified the update in -proposed. With lucid VM and
all updates, changing the UID of a user to 999 didn't update
/etc/passwd. After installing the update in -proposed, I could
successfully change it to 999, at which point the user wasn't available
in the GUI anymore.
@Charlie:
I was able to successfully verify the package in -proposed.
I started with a Lucid VM with the latest released updates. When
following the steps in the original report, I got the error message.
After updating to the package in -proposed and rebooting, I could now
edit and save the user successfull
I have successfully tested the package in -proposed. With the updated
package, I was able to add and remove users, change parameters, etc.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
I have successfully tested the package in -proposed. With the updated
package, I was able to add and remove users, change parameters, etc. and
have not seen the crash.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Debdiff in #93 looks good. I'm uploading package for natty now. Thanks!
** Changed in: gst-plugins-good0.10 (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-good0.10 in
I don't believe it is the same issue. I rebuilt pygtk packages with the
patch in gnome bug #640738, and although they fix the issue in that bug,
they don't seem to fix the issue with virt-manager.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subs
Something changes in pygobject 2.27.0+git20110131 that causes this.
Downgrading to 2.27.0+git20110108 makes it work again.
** Also affects: pygobject (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which
I see this with 2.30.3-1ubuntu2 on natty and a G4 with Leopard and the
latest updates.
** Changed in: vinagre (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Upstream commit:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-
server/commit/?h=gnome-2-32&id=ff2a3874a379ae3071b40858d096c6633a093e3c
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #635339
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635339
** Changed in: evolution
Importance: Medium => Unknown
** C
Ah, we already have 2.32.2, and it looks like it's fixed for me now.
Closing.
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 49579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
This is the same root cause as bug #49579. Setting as duplicate.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 49579
screen doesn't lock when panel menu is open
* You can subscribe to bug 49579 by followin
As per your last comment, I am closing this bug. Thanks!
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Nothing is supposed to go away when you unlock the screensaver.
Could you please give the exact steps needed to reproduce this bug?
Thanks.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Deskto
Thanks for reporting this issue.
Could you please give the exact steps necessary to reproduce this issue,
including which media player you are using?
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Thanks for reporting this issue.
Could you please take a look at the following debugging information?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingScreenLocking
Also, could you please attach your /var/log/auth.log after the problem
has occured?
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New =>
Thanks for reporting this issue.
Could you please get the information from the "Extra information" and "Getting
GConf values" section of the following wiki page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingScreenLocking
Thanks.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #547865
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547865
** Also affects: gnome-screensaver via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547865
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 556255 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556255
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 556255
unlock screen -dialog comes up twice
* You can subscribe to bug 556255 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screens
What screensaver do you have specified in
System/Preferences/Screensaver? Is it "Blank screen"?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690455
Title:
Screen saver
I see this also, but it's drawing it _underneath_ my top gnome-panel.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
Status: Confirmed
** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
Status
arc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Also affects: brasero (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: brasero (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
tus: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu Maverick)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
** Summary changed:
- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless erro
SRU Request:
Impact: Brasero cannot copy an audio CD in Lucid and Maverick because of
an incorrectly detected cdrdao binary.
Brasero will try and determine if the cdrdao binary is the required
version by executing it and parsing the banner. Because of libao in
Lucid and Maverick, the cdrdao binar
** Patch added: "lucid debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/brasero/+bug/529696/+attachment/1850568/+files/brasero_2.30.2-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu.
ht
901 - 1000 of 1524 matches
Mail list logo
