Re: the about-me capplet

2005-07-17 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 03:56 +0200, Diego Gonzalez wrote: > I can change the capplet to also update the related GECOS fields. Doing this from the capplet doesn't solve the problem that /etc/passwd and e-d-s diverge, since you can e.g. also change the full name from the evolution contact editor. T

Re: Default theme

2005-07-17 Thread Jeff Waugh
> One alternative would be that you just call it Clearlooks and we change > the Clearlooks default to be what you have in mind (at least for the > metatheme, which is GNOME specific anyway). Another one would be to call > it Default or maybe GNOME Default. In any case I think the comment should >

Re: Default theme

2005-07-17 Thread Daniel Borgmann
Heya, I'm obviously very excited about this, but some comments: Please let's clean up the theme list a little bit. Right now it is proper chaos. The theme called "Default" which has the comment "Gnome Default Theme" is not even the default theme since quite a while. If we'd now add Clearlooks and

Re: build break: gnome-keyring

2005-07-17 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2005 à 20:38 +0800, James Henstridge a écrit : > glibc has a number of flags used to define what standards you want to > use. By default you get everything (I think), but you can define flags > such that prototypes for only POSIX functions are defined (as an example). > >

Re: Default theme

2005-07-17 Thread Luca Ferretti
Il giorno gio, 14/07/2005 alle 17.17 -0500, Shaun McCance ha scritto: > Really. The default theme. Let's make this happen. > > http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/Clearlooks.tar > > Take that tarball. Extract it in a fresh gnome-themes checkout. > It'll add the Clearlooks Metacity theme, the Clearloo

build break (+ patch): gnome-control-center

2005-07-17 Thread Jeroen Zwartepoorte
Seems gnome-control-center checks if Xcursor headers are present, but fails to add the -lXcursor argument to the CAPPLET_LIBS. Patch attached to #310643. Dunno why this hasn't been noticed before though (so i'm not entirely sure the patch is correct). Without the patch, the build fails on x86_64 w