> The release team met last week, and we talked a bit about the new
> module stuff. As usual, we tried to understand and reflect the
> community consensus as reflected in d-d-l and other forums, with the
> understanding that sometimes we have to, you know, go ahead and decide
> ;)
>
> In:
> * evinc
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 17:49 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> Punted to 2.13/2.14
> * eggcups: this was pushed very late, and partially as a result there
> * productivity/office suite: the discussions about where this would
I'm guessing gnome-power-manager[1] and gnome-screensaver fall into the
2.14 time
Bastien,
You are right! I have misunderstood Mark. Sorry Mark :)
Mark,
What you have said below is precisely what I have in mind! Thank you
for saying out loud for me. :)
-Ghee
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:22 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> You misunderstood what Mark said. It will be up to the maintainer of
> that module (a priori, yourself) to handle bugs. However, he pointed you
> to a bunch of bugs with existing patches. If you want the bugs to stay,
> you're free not to
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:22 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> >Hi Ghee,
> >
> >On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:51 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>(a) Create a new CVS module that just contains smproxy
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I've no problem at all with you doing this.
> >
> >
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:22 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> >Hi Ghee,
> >
> >On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:51 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>(a) Create a new CVS module that just contains smproxy
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I've no problem at all with you doing this.
> >
> >
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Ghee,
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:51 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
(a) Create a new CVS module that just contains smproxy
I've no problem at all with you doing this.
However, do note that you'll also need patches to make GNOME not get
screwed up with
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:25 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > * gnome-applets xkb stuff
>
> Still not fixed.
Should be fixed now. Looks like the combination of a compiling chunks
out of order and some randomly confusing #defines (I don't know how or
why those changed). Compiles for me now on two mach
Hi Ghee,
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:51 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
> (a) Create a new CVS module that just contains smproxy
I've no problem at all with you doing this.
However, do note that you'll also need patches to make GNOME not get
screwed up with gnome-smproxy - e.g. bugs #118063
On 7/28/05, Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:25:01 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
>
> > Similar with libgtop:
>
> Fixed in CVS by Alexander Shopov. Apologies for this blunder.
Thanks, Yavor, Alexander. Much appreciated.
Luis (sparing you all for the weekend)
P.S. any
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:25:01 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> Similar with libgtop:
Fixed in CVS by Alexander Shopov. Apologies for this blunder.
--
Yavor Doganov JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Association - Bulgaria http://fsa-bg.org
GNOME in Bulgarian!
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi,
I've removed gnome-smproxy from gnome-session HEAD now.
Can I plead for some traces of gnome-smproxy to be remained on gnome cvs
for the following reasons:
(1) On Solaris, CDE will remain for a long time to come and all the CDE
apps need
gnome-sm
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:25:01 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> Similar with libgtop:
<...>
> make[2]: *** [bg.gmo] Error 1
Strange, this seems like a bug in intltool-update as the plural forms are
not updated. I've made a patch and hope that our fearless team leader
will fix it asap. In case you need
Hi Colin,
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:03 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 17:16 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >
> > For various reasons I'm not entirely sure it makes sense to use D-BUS
> > notification:
> >
> > - We're not actually interested in using the D-BUS service
14 matches
Mail list logo
