Re: Removing xrdb for 10% startup win?

2005-08-31 Thread John Rice
Lorenzo - I built Erwann's patch for JDS on Solaris 10 and saw a reduction from 10 xrdb calls in gnome-settings on startup to 3 :) If you aren't seeing the multiple xrdb calls maybe this is Solaris specific. Gave me about a 1 second improvement over a 15 sec gnome-session start to notification-

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Data Server - LGPL

2005-08-31 Thread Not Zed
Yes, but "eds" is a process, I had no idea it extended to camel. Anyway, whatever, Novell can do whatever they want with thier own code. On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 09:37 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 10:58 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > > I never expected copious after-hours e

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Data Server - LGPL

2005-08-31 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 10:58 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > I never expected copious after-hours effort to be dragged from under me > in this way. I didn't even know this was on the cards. > > Well, the project wiki has carried this on its 2.4 Task List for the entire development cycle [ http://go-evol

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Data Server - LGPL

2005-08-31 Thread Not Zed
Well i must say that i'm very dissapointed by this news. I never expected copious after-hours effort to be dragged from under me in this way. I didn't even know this was on the cards. On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 20:46 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > hi, > > !!! drumrolls !!! > > Evolution D

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server branched

2005-08-31 Thread Luis Villa
On 8/31/05, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This rocks! I'd love to see every module maintainer write down their plans > > for the next release (if they have them) in the wiki[1] and include a link > > in the branch email in the future. > > [1] live.gnome.org [2][3] > [2] always ha

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server branched

2005-08-31 Thread Jeff Waugh
> This rocks! I'd love to see every module maintainer write down their plans > for the next release (if they have them) in the wiki[1] and include a link > in the branch email in the future. [1] live.gnome.org [2] [2] always happy to provide footnote services - Jeff -- GNOME Summit: October 8

Re: Removing xrdb for 10% startup win?

2005-08-31 Thread Lorenzo Colitti
Bastien Nocera wrote: These seem both to be a little bit old and are not packaged by many distributions. As an alternative, I've been looking at mcpp: http://www.m17n.org/mcpp/index_eng.html It's more recent, about 93k in size, and reads no external libraries. Replacing cpp with mcpp decrease

Re: Removing xrdb for 10% startup win?

2005-08-31 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 19:37 +0200, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > decus cpp is good enough in my experience to process these files, about > > 40K and public domain. Its ANSI-ish but not strict and perfect in all > > respects. The ACK pre-processor is also now free and might be useful

Re: Removing xrdb for 10% startup win?

2005-08-31 Thread Lorenzo Colitti
Alan Cox wrote: decus cpp is good enough in my experience to process these files, about 40K and public domain. Its ANSI-ish but not strict and perfect in all respects. The ACK pre-processor is also now free and might be useful but does rather more than would be wanted. These seem both to be a l

Re: Removing xrdb for 10% startup win?

2005-08-31 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 22:30 -0500, William Lovaton wrote: > Not exactly I guess, I think Lorenzo means something more like grope. I > wonder why a function reordering thingy like this is still missing on > Linux. > > [] http://lwn.net/1998/1029/als/rope.html There's work in progress to do funct

Re: gtkspell (was Re: Announcing: Project Ridley)

2005-08-31 Thread Steven Garrity
Reinout van Schouwen wrote: Just breaking into the discussion here, but I would suggest for any GNOME/GTK spelling widget to use Enchant as engine. Enchant can use multiple spell checking engines as back end and it works quite well (Abiword uses it). Reinout, Work is underway on GtkSpell 3.x, w

Re: Evolution Data Server - LGPL

2005-08-31 Thread Luis Villa
On 8/31/05, Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > !!! drumrolls !!! > > Evolution Data Server is now licensed under the terms of LGPL. > This includes the libecal, libebook, libedataserver, libedataserverui > and the libcamel libraries. This is great news; always good to rem

Evolution Data Server - LGPL

2005-08-31 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
hi, !!! drumrolls !!! Evolution Data Server is now licensed under the terms of LGPL. This includes the libecal, libebook, libedataserver, libedataserverui and the libcamel libraries. The team is also planning to stablize the API, polish the documentation, pepper them with starter-tutorials

Re: gnome-games branched

2005-08-31 Thread Luis Villa
On 8/30/05, Callum McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/30/05, Callum McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> gnome-games has been branched for gnome-2-12 > >> > >> gnome-2-12 is the stable branch > >> HEAD will become unstable (really, really, unstable) in a few days time > > > > Care to

Re: gtkspell (was Re: Announcing: Project Ridley)

2005-08-31 Thread Reinout van Schouwen
Op Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:27:52 +0200, schreef Chipzz: > And how do you justify gtk+ depending on it (or aspell or ispell or pspell > for that matter)? I don't think I have to justify anything, I didn't bring up the subject. I'm just saying that if there's going to be a spellcheck widget in GNOME, i

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server branched

2005-08-31 Thread Luis Villa
On 8/31/05, Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > The gnome-2-12 branch for Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server has been > created. This would be the stable branch for Evolution 2.4 and > Evolution-Data-Server 1.4 > > For action ahead on HEAD branch, check out > http://go-evol

Re: gtkspell (was Re: Announcing: Project Ridley)

2005-08-31 Thread Chipzz
And how do you justify gtk+ depending on it (or aspell or ispell or pspell for that matter)? On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > Op Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:03:00 -0400, schreef Bryan Clark: > > > I don't have a problem "me too"ing this request, since I think I've been > > asking for sp

Re: gtkspell (was Re: Announcing: Project Ridley)

2005-08-31 Thread Reinout van Schouwen
Op Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:03:00 -0400, schreef Bryan Clark: > I don't have a problem "me too"ing this request, since I think I've been > asking for spell checking for all text-entry widgets for the past two > years as well as a richer textview widget. IMHO we should have a > textview Just breaking