Le vendredi 10 février 2006 à 08:40 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
Another idea to reduce the anciety issue would be to start counting in
larger
increments, say 10 seconds, and only switch to per-second updates for
the last 20 seconds or so.
Done in HEAD (except it does the per-seconds
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 02:54 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Anna Marie Dirks
What a big jerkbird! So lazy! So community-tearing! Definitely the work of
an evil, evil noncontributor.
Anna, as I mentioned in another email, this frustration is about a broader
problem we have in our
quote who=Lex Hider
(A similar set of issues were expressed more eloquently in my GUADEC talk,
if you want to watch that video.)
do you have a link?
http://stream.fluendo.com/archive/6uadec/Jeff_Waugh_-_Project_Topaz.ogg
- Jeff
--
FOSDEM 2006: Brussels, Belgium
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 14:29 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
It is possible to run for instance 'gst-inspect-0.10' in the postinst
script to force the registry rebuild.
Will that remove the overhead for all users, or just the user who runs
Hi all,
My god, I am a little surprised at the discussion that has resulted
from a small comparison I made on my blog. :P I want to be entirely
clear in my opinion here - I was not criticising Novell for these
changes, just making the comparison.
In terms of the 'design behind closed doors', I
Hi all,
The release team met yesterday to talk about all the current issues.
Here are our conclusions.
New modules:
+ gnome-power-manager: people like it, but some mor work is needed,
and more integration should be done. It won't go in for 2.14, but
we'd like to see a good integration
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 18:23 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
+ gnome-power-manager: people like it, but some mor work is needed,
and more integration should be done. It won't go in for 2.14, but
we'd like to see a good integration work starting soon for 2.16.
No worries. Does this mean I
On 2/11/06, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 18:23 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
+ gnome-power-manager: people like it, but some mor work is needed,
and more integration should be done. It won't go in for 2.14, but
we'd like to see a good integration work
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 10:53 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 2/11/06, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 18:23 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
+ gnome-power-manager: people like it, but some mor work is needed,
and more integration should be done. It won't go in
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 18:23 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
+ gnome-icon-theme: we fully support the adoption of the new icon
naming spec. However the change happened too late for this cycle. We
will ship with the 2.12 versions of gnome-icon-theme for GNOME 2.14
and encourage people
Em Sáb, 2006-02-11 às 17:09 +, Thomas Wood escreveu:
This is to confirm that the gtk-engines team have decided that, in light
of the recent issues raised on various mailing lists, and our own
assessment of the progress we have made towards the goals for
gtk-engines 2.8, we would like to
Hi Vincent,
I've been informed [1] (in a bugzilla comment, of all places) that
Gnome 2.14 is going to use the 2.12 branch of librsvg in the upcoming
release. I'd like confirmation on that, as my reference is only to a
jhbuild module set, and I don't know how authoritative that is.
Caleb Moore,
On 2/11/06, Dominic Lachowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I've been informed [1] (in a bugzilla comment, of all places) that
Gnome 2.14 is going to use the 2.12 branch of librsvg in the upcoming
release. I'd like confirmation on that, as my reference is only to a
jhbuild module set,
Hi Elijah,
Crap. It sucks that this wasn't noticed so that those testing cvs
could be testing the right thing. It looks like this was because you
guys branched early last release, the 2.12 moduleset got copied for
2.14, and then no one caught this and updated it. Anyway, can you
update
On 2/11/06, Dominic Lachowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.13 has gotten a lot of testing, and has come out a lot better than
any previously released version. It has had a good number of bugs
filed against it (and fixed), so it's gotten some testing by people
other than Caleb and myself. I'm
On 2/11/06, Dominic Lachowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, we branched early so that we could focus on getting Cairo
integration hammered out.
I don't use jhbuild, so I would be more comfortable if someone who
does use it made this change. I'd rather not make the change without
being able
Hi,
I have just branched gnome-icon-theme for gnome-2-14, from an earlier
date in the 2.13 cycle, where the changes to follow the naming spec have
not yet been implemented. A couple of fixes and a new icon used by the
search functionality added to Nautilus in 2.14, are still in however.
I have
Andy Wingo wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 14:29 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
It is possible to run for instance 'gst-inspect-0.10' in the postinst
script to force the registry rebuild.
Will that remove the overhead for all users, or
18 matches
Mail list logo
