Le mardi 11 avril 2006 à 23:22 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit :
> OK,
>
> So, in accordance with previous correspondence I sent about the use of
> po/LINGUAS rather than ALL_LINGUAS in configure.{in,ac}, I hereby
> present to you, the Correct (TM) way to migrate to using the LINGUAS
> file in your po
Le lundi 10 avril 2006 à 17:00 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit :
> It has just come to my attention that one of the GNOME Goals is to port
> GNOME to using the po/LINGUAS file for 2.16, rather than having the
> LINGUAS listed directly in configure.{in,ac}.
>
> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PoLingua
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Daniel Carrera wrítes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thanks to all who gave suggestions. One of the suggestions turns out to
> > work quite well:
> >
> > 1. Configure Gnome just the way I want it.
> > 2. sudo cp ~/.g* /etc/skel
>
> Af least for .gconfd it is a b
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Esben Stien wrote:
> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:13:42 +0200
> From: Esben Stien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [gnome-love] Participate to the GNOME Goals and feel
> the love!
>
> Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > G
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:23 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
>
> Let's evaluate things and fix real problems rather than just straight
> out nuking capplets because some people never open them. The gstreamer
> properties and sound properties, should be integrated together
> probably,
> rather than just
Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://jimmac.musichall.cz/weblog.php/Artwork/ScalableIcons.php
You don't model the bus, from the mountain.
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
http://www. s tn m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23cont
Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> GTK+ does support SVG icons.
I mean using them in the upper left corner of the window. The gtk
window icon.
> http://jimmac.musichall.cz/weblog.php/Artwork/ScalableIcons.php
I don't agree;). If you make a simple big one and scale it down, it'll
still
On 4/12/06, Esben Stien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'm saying is outlaw PNG throughout GNOME and use only vector
> graphics, like SVG. Then we don't have this problem anymore;).
Reread what I said. Also, read the links shaunm posted.
--
Travis Watkins
http://www.realistanew.com
___
"Travis Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You still need to make smaller png versions of the icon.
What I'm saying is outlaw PNG throughout GNOME and use only vector
graphics, like SVG. Then we don't have this problem anymore;).
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 01:20 +0200, Esben Stien wrote:
> Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > a number of icons
>
> We should have GTK+ support SVG icons and then switch completely to
> use SVG. We don't have to provide different sizes then, for icons used
> in different sizes around e
On 4/12/06, Rodney Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 15:07 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> > Well, if you're going to put it like that... ;-) How about nuking
> > some unneeded preference capplets cluttering the menus -- Windows,
> > CDDB, Menus & Toolbars, and Multimedia Sy
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:38 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:23 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > After installing libgnome-2.14.1, I no longer get any libgnome
> > translation files. It looks like an autotools snafu. Can the dist be
> > respun and resubmitted? Thanks.
>
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:23 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> After installing libgnome-2.14.1, I no longer get any libgnome
> translation files. It looks like an autotools snafu. Can the dist be
> respun and resubmitted? Thanks.
It is probably http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330509 t
On 4/12/06, Esben Stien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should have GTK+ support SVG icons and then switch completely to
> use SVG. We don't have to provide different sizes then, for icons used
> in different sizes around everywhere and it would look good on big
> screens.
You still need to make s
Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> a number of icons
We should have GTK+ support SVG icons and then switch completely to
use SVG. We don't have to provide different sizes then, for icons used
in different sizes around everywhere and it would look good on big
screens.
--
Esben Stien is
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 15:07 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 4/12/06, Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > g-c-c has been branched, so there's now a gnome-2-14 branch for further
> > 2.14 fixes.
> >
> > No specific plans for HEAD/2.15 yet, apart from, right now, committing
> > some patches i
After installing libgnome-2.14.1, I no longer get any libgnome
translation files. It looks like an autotools snafu. Can the dist be
respun and resubmitted? Thanks.
Joe
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www
On 4/12/06, Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> g-c-c has been branched, so there's now a gnome-2-14 branch for further
> 2.14 fixes.
>
> No specific plans for HEAD/2.15 yet, apart from, right now, committing
> some patches in bugzilla that were waiting for the branch.
> Suggestions/ideas on
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 23:14 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 16:37 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> > On 4/9/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We currently have two goals:
> > >
> > > + http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/AppIcon
> > > This is about correctly in
I agree this should replace gtik directly, a few quick hacks on solaris
and it was up and running, much
better than gtik in my opinion
Raphael Slinckx wrote:
Hi !
Since we must propose modules for gnome 2.16 here it is:
I'm proposing the Invest Applet (not-yet-)module to be included.
I'v
Daniel Carrera writes:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> > They are: /apps/panel/default_setup/applets and /apps/panel/applets.
>
> I see it. I also see /apps/panel/default_setup/objects. But I don't see
> a way to change what's there. Adding an icon means adding a new object
> and I can't see a way t
On 4/11/06, Kjartan Maraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - fix all critical warnings
> - go through the valgrind report here:
> http://www.gnome.org/~kmaraas/baobab-valgrind.log
>
> Here's a few comments from running it through the intel compiler too:
>
Could you pls check now if you still have th
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
They are: /apps/panel/default_setup/applets and /apps/panel/applets.
I see it. I also see /apps/panel/default_setup/objects. But I don't see
a way to change what's there. Adding an icon means adding a new object
and I can't see a way to do that from gconf-editor. Also,
Kjartan,
thank you very much for your kind suggestions..
On 4/11/06, Kjartan Maraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After looking at it a bit I've found the following things I'd suggest be
> improved first:
>
> - be consistent in coding style. There's a lot of inconsistencies and
> wrong indentation
tir, 11,.04.2006 kl. 11.29 -0600, skrev Elijah Newren:
> On 4/11/06, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all;
> >
> > [I really don't know if this requires a full module proposal or not, but
> > anyway, here we go]
> >
> > I'd like to propose the inclusion of Baobab[1] in the gnome-u
Daniel Carrera writes:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> > If you will start gconf-editor as a root, you are able to change all
> > these settings for all users. It's easy and intuitive to define here
> > most aspects of GNOME (well, except default panel, which is extremely
> > unintuitive here).
>
> Bu
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
If you will start gconf-editor as a root, you are able to change all
these settings for all users. It's easy and intuitive to define here
most aspects of GNOME (well, except default panel, which is extremely
unintuitive here).
But the things I want to define are not on t
Daniel Carrera writes:
> Ok, how about just ~/.gnome2 ? That should be enough for the panel,
> right? And what about the menu? Is that also in ~/.gnome2 ?
No. Panel is a part of GConf settings. The rest of ~/.gnome2 is not much
useful, because by copying it you will define things you don't want
På Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:41:39PM +0100, Daniel Carrera skrev:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> >>Thanks to all who gave suggestions. One of the suggestions turns out to
> >>work quite well:
> >>
> >>1. Configure Gnome just the way I want it.
> >>2. sudo cp ~/.g* /etc/skel
> >
> >Af least for .gconfd
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Thanks to all who gave suggestions. One of the suggestions turns out to
work quite well:
1. Configure Gnome just the way I want it.
2. sudo cp ~/.g* /etc/skel
Af least for .gconfd it is a bad idea.
[snip: also .gconf and .gnome2_private]
Ok, how about just ~/.gnome2
Daniel Carrera wrítes:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to all who gave suggestions. One of the suggestions turns out to
> work quite well:
>
> 1. Configure Gnome just the way I want it.
> 2. sudo cp ~/.g* /etc/skel
Af least for .gconfd it is a bad idea.
For .gconf you should prefer root's gconf database (
g-c-c has been branched, so there's now a gnome-2-14 branch for further
2.14 fixes.
No specific plans for HEAD/2.15 yet, apart from, right now, committing
some patches in bugzilla that were waiting for the branch.
Suggestions/ideas on what should be fixed/improved are appreciated
--
Rodrigo Moya
32 matches
Mail list logo
