Hi,
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On 7/22/06, Joe Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If Mike were starting from scratch here, this would be great. But there
>> are already users of these bindings and breaking them up would
>> effectively break ABI for existing users. Gtk# already has its own
>> stabi
On 7/22/06, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>If those guarantees are more important to you than playing
>by the rules of the Gnome Bindings set, than Gtk# may
>simply be better of staying outside...
First, we have to see the problem from a high level and ask ourselves: is
Mike's goal to not break compatib
Le samedi 22 juillet 2006, à 15:44, Joe Shaw a écrit :
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Vincent Untz wrote:
> > The API in the bindings suite covers the platform API. This has to be
> > clear to ISD/ISV and we don't want to compromise this message. Please
> > don't consider Gtk# only, but the platform (with the
On 7/22/06, Joe Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Vincent Untz wrote:
> > The API in the bindings suite covers the platform API. This has to be
> > clear to ISD/ISV and we don't want to compromise this message. Please
> > don't consider Gtk# only, but the platform (with the bindings
Hi,
Novell has sent me their patch to replace the Tintin icon with a Tango
icon, so the next release will no longer have it.
-Alex
Steve Frécinaux wrote:
> Jeff Waugh wrote:
>>
>>
>>> * Should we include Tomboy in the Desktop suite? (completely
>>>independently from the fact that it uses
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Untz wrote:
> The API in the bindings suite covers the platform API. This has to be
> clear to ISD/ISV and we don't want to compromise this message. Please
> don't consider Gtk# only, but the platform (with the bindings) as a
> whole.
>
> It's not about additional guarantees.
Hi Mike,
Le vendredi 21 juillet 2006, à 11:27, Mike Kestner a écrit :
> On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 00:03 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
> > * Should we include Gtk# in the Bindings suite?
> > - the release management issues have largely been solved, aside from Gtk#
> > not being split between Platf
> * avahi depends on libglade; need to modify the gnome-2.16 moduleset to
> reflect this dependency
>
> * avahi depends on pygtk (and pycairo, pygobject); need to modify
> gnome-2.16 moduleset to reflect this dependency
>
> * avahi depends on dbus-python and dbus-glib bindings set; dbus-python
This weekend I have tried to build Yelp and all it's dependencies from
jhbuild. I ran in to quite a few problems, so I'm complaining publicly
here (I know Jeff will hate me for this):
* avahi depends on libgdbm; libgdbm-dev needs to be installed for avahi
Do we currently have a list of "exter
Sáb, 2006-07-22 às 12:21 +0100, Ed Mack escreveu:
> > Tomboy looks like a hybrid (or should I say mutant) wiki page system
> > and mind mapping software.
>
> You should try using it for a week.
I guess that's fair; I didn't actually use it, I only played with it.
> The concept works really
Sorry to interrupt...
To make everybody happy, may we split the desktop suite?
gnome-base-desktop (C apps) which can have independently and
optionnally installed on top the following:
gnome-CPP-desktop-suite
gnome-python-desktop-suite
gnome-mono-desktop-suite
gnome-java-desktop-suite
gnome-ruby-d
(This should maybe be moved to the usability list but rather than CC'ing
and making the discussion too hard to follow I'll respond here.)
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Ryan Paul wrote:
> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:13:08 -0700
> From: Ryan Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> Cc: M
lør, 22 07 2006 kl. 12:08 +0100, skrev Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro:
> Sáb, 2006-07-22 às 00:10 +0200, David Nielsen escreveu:
> > lør, 22 07 2006 kl. 02:33 +1000, skrev Jeff Waugh:
> > >
> > >
> > > > * Should we include Tomboy in the Desktop suite? (completely
> > > >independently from the fa
Le samedi 22 juillet 2006 à 13:47 +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay a
écrit :
> o Passing of tomboy notes over IP to an existing Tomboy session on
> someone else's boxen (ala KNotes)
You can do something like this with tasks in Evolution. So if you could
do it with memo and if Tomboy shared
> Tomboy looks like a hybrid (or should I say mutant) wiki page system
> and mind mapping software.
You should try using it for a week. The concept works really well in
actuality. It is good for short term mind-mapping and for longer term
note taking.
Ed Mack
_
Sáb, 2006-07-22 às 00:10 +0200, David Nielsen escreveu:
> lør, 22 07 2006 kl. 02:33 +1000, skrev Jeff Waugh:
> >
> >
> > > * Should we include Tomboy in the Desktop suite? (completely
> > >independently from the fact that it uses Gtk#/Mono)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's my point of view, comp
On 7/22/06, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/21/06, Fernando Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, they are:
> >
> > [example for gnome-calculator .desktop file]
> >
> > X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Bugzilla=GNOME
> > X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Product=gcalctool
> > X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Component=g
Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
>> * Should we include Tomboy in the Desktop suite? (completely
>>independently from the fact that it uses Gtk#/Mono)
IIRC, there was an issue regarding Tomboy's icon (it was Tintin's head,
which was both ugly and copyrighted). Was this one addressed or does it
still
Ryan Paul wrote:
> * In XChat it's "XChat"
XChat is not part of Gnome, nor tries to integrate with it in any way.
I'd suggest you to take a look at XChat-Gnome, which is a spin-off
project trying to respect the HIG...
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Waugh wrote:
> * Without a doubt, Tomboy is pure awesome.
Amen. Only 2 gripes:
o Passing of tomboy notes over IP to an existing Tomboy session on
someone else's boxen (ala KNotes)
o A plugin for tomboy that allows back and forth import export
20 matches
Mail list logo
