gnome-panel (finally) branched for 2.14

2006-07-23 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, gnome-panel has been branched for 2.14. The 2.14 branch is gnome-2-14. HEAD is for 2.15/2.16. There's no known plans. Yet :-) Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails

2006-07-23 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, I know the issues splitting Gtk# can bring, but not splitting also brings issues from the GNOME point of view. And that's more important in my mind (maybe I'm alone in thinking that, though ;-)) I would be interested in understanding what the issues of non-splitting are, from the GNOME

Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails

2006-07-23 Thread Mike Kestner
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 23:12 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote: If those guarantees are more important to you than playing by the rules of the Gnome Bindings set, than Gtk# may simply be better of staying outside... Starting to seem like it. The other alternative is to alter the rules, which I believe

Re: CVS/JHBuild complaints

2006-07-23 Thread Luca Ferretti
Il giorno sab, 22/07/2006 alle 12.48 -0600, Brent Smith ha scritto: This weekend I have tried to build Yelp and all it's dependencies from jhbuild. I ran in to quite a few problems, so I'm complaining publicly here (I know Jeff will hate me for this): * avahi depends on libgdbm;

Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails

2006-07-23 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
Just being in the bindings set doesn't really get app developers anything. I very much disagree. Being in an official gnome release (even if that's just bindings), it is like Gnome saying to distros and devs out there: look, here's gtk#, it's now stable, it works well, go ahead, install it and

Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails

2006-07-23 Thread Ben Maurer
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: Miguel wrote: I would be interested in understanding what the issues of non-splitting are, from the GNOME point of view. For one, if in the future Gnome would like to provide an embedded version (there was some talk about it already), it would be

Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails

2006-07-23 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, Miguel wrote: I would be interested in understanding what the issues of non-splitting are, from the GNOME point of view. For one, if in the future Gnome would like to provide an embedded version (there was some talk about it already), it would be easier to pick and choose

Re: CVS/JHBuild complaints

2006-07-23 Thread Elijah Newren
On 7/23/06, Luca Ferretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Il giorno sab, 22/07/2006 alle 12.48 -0600, Brent Smith ha scritto: * avahi depends on dbus-python and dbus-glib bindings set; dbus-python and dbus-glib are now in a git repository (bug 347674); need to add to modulesets and add appropriate

Re: CVS/JHBuild complaints

2006-07-23 Thread Brent Smith
Luca Ferretti wrote: Il giorno sab, 22/07/2006 alle 12.48 -0600, Brent Smith ha scritto: This weekend I have tried to build Yelp and all it's dependencies from jhbuild. I ran in to quite a few problems, so I'm complaining publicly here (I know Jeff will hate me for this): * avahi depends

Bindings

2006-07-23 Thread Sean Kelley
On the subject of language bindings, there has been some interesting comments related to the debate here taking place from the perspective of KDE and C++. http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/2183 Sean ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list