On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 20:36 +0200, Isak Savo wrote:
> As such, I don't really see why this thing would be impose any
> security issues that didn't exist earlier. Lots of applications
> already have a plug-in system, and to my knowledge, they also allow
> extra plugins to be installed in $HOME (i.e.
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:45 +1000, Nigel Tao wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With an automated listy-clicky thing, you don't get to see
> > explicit files, and you have no way of checking against a
> > checksum or a digital signature.
>
> Yeah, an example: suppose
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 20:45 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> Ironically hal or gnome-vfs seem to insist that my Compact Flash and
> Memory Stick devices are all USB hard disks, both on FC5, and on my
> laptop running SLED 10. And, no, this isn't due to a theme with the
> wrong symlinks. It happens with
On 7/31/06, Steve Frécinaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nigel Tao wrote:
> >> > You mean running untrusted code from the Web?
> >>
> >> Nigel said it would be possible to secure it a bit using GPG keys.
> >> Maybe this kind of signing should be made a requirement.
> >
> > Well, should signing be n
On 8/1/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would waiting for the 2.18 release cycle be an issue for desbkar?
I don't think that there's any issues, but we'll discuss this on
deskbar-applet-list. If we do punt to 2.18, will we just rebadge the
latest 2.14 as 2.16.0? Leave d-a 2.14 as 2.
> Nobody has made it an excuse. The icons didn't disappear. They were
> symlinked to another icon. It's been that way for 8+ months. And not a
> single person has complained or filed a bug on it, until now. I would
> consider linking to the wrong icon to be a bug. However, it hasn't come up
> in
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 20:03 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> There is now a media-flash icon in CVS in the scalable size. There will
> be versions for the other sizes also, very soon. And media-flash is now
> in the Naming Spec. I've also renamed drive-cdrom and media-cdrom to
> drive-optical and media
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 13:33 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> So I think the solution here in the interim (e.g. for 2.16) is to make
> gnome-icon-theme provide icons, not symlinks, of the stuff that was
> deleted. For example gnome-removable-media-cf and friends.
Rodney, do you have any opinion on th
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 23:48 -0400, Phillip Ezolt wrote:
>For SOC, I've been trying to track down why the nautilus startup
> time is so variable. I have a theory that nautilus blocks waiting for
> its dependencies to start (bonobo-activation-server,
> gnome-volume-manager, gnome-vfs-daemon).
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 17:49 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 16:45 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> > In my opinion, yes, it has to come now, or it will never come. It is
> > already a regression that it was there and is no longer there. I prefer
> > the look of my 2.8 desktop with
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 16:45 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> In my opinion, yes, it has to come now, or it will never come. It is
> already a regression that it was there and is no longer there. I prefer
> the look of my 2.8 desktop with icons that were "consistent enough" to
> my 2.12 desktop where
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 14:28 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> Jakub Steiner wrote:
> > An image thumbnail will give you much more information than a text label
> > on a tiny icon and that is likely to be the default case on the GNOME
> > desktop.
>
> Unless, like me, you're always converting images tha
Jakub Steiner wrote:
> I don't know how much time exactly went into gnome icon theme over the
> years, but I do feel like we failed to provide a good icon theming
> platform for distributions. Back then we had old Gnome 1.0 styled icons
> inconsistency. Then I tried to create an icon for every sing
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 20:36 +0200, Isak Savo wrote:
> 2006/8/1, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Le mardi 01 août 2006, à 11:42, Nigel Tao a écrit :
> > > > > You mean running untrusted code from the Web?
> >
> > > > Nigel said it would be possible to secure it a bit using GPG keys
2006/8/1, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Le mardi 01 août 2006, à 11:42, Nigel Tao a écrit :
> > > > You mean running untrusted code from the Web?
>
> > > Nigel said it would be possible to secure it a bit using GPG keys.
> > > Maybe this kind of signing should be made a requirement.
>
Jakub Steiner wrote:
> An image thumbnail will give you much more information than a text label
> on a tiny icon and that is likely to be the default case on the GNOME
> desktop.
Unless, like me, you're always converting images that are large and you
don't want to thumbnail, but you want to quick
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 18:31 +0200, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> I perfectly see the advantage of having a set of unique device icons for
> different flash cards. It's undoubtedly easier to use if my desktop is
> populated by distinguishable device icons. But in my view it's much
> worse to have, say Blue
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:37 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On 8/1/06, Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I always intended to draw the specific media icons, but I really hope to
> > see infrastructure for getting the generic fallback in place first so
> > that theming is actually a so
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On 8/1/06, Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I always intended to draw the specific media icons, but I really hope to
>> see infrastructure for getting the generic fallback in place first so
>> that theming is actually a solution and not an excuse.
>
> But cer
On 8/1/06, Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always intended to draw the specific media icons, but I really hope to
> see infrastructure for getting the generic fallback in place first so
> that theming is actually a solution and not an excuse.
But certainly thats not an excuse for rip
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 10:31 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> David Zeuthen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 18:06 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> >> I will however, disagree that we need to provide such explicit
> >> icons as to state what method a hard disk is connect to the computer
> >> through, or wha
It's probably libbonoboui that needs to add libgail-gnome as an
additional module.
I am a little uneasy about making this change so late, but if someone
volunteers to help test, I'd be OK with it.
Bill
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:34, Jani Monoses wrote:
> James Henstridge wrote:
> > I think you'll
James Henstridge wrote:
> I think you'll agree that we want a11y enabled for all GTK
> applications, and the best way to do this is to make the
> initialisation happen in gtk_init(). The gtk-modules XSETTING makes
> this possible. The proposed method of getting things loaded is:
>
> 1. gnome-set
David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 18:06 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
>> I will however, disagree that we need to provide such explicit
>> icons as to state what method a hard disk is connect to the computer
>> through, or what type of data is contained on an optical disc, in a
>> base
>> G
On 01/08/06, Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cant python be sandboxed?
>
> not sure if it helps in this case or not as I bet you want the python
> code to have full access to the system.
Not in the sense that javascript can be sandboxed. Some of the
developers are looking at restrict
Hi,
Le mardi 01 août 2006, à 11:42, Nigel Tao a écrit :
> > > You mean running untrusted code from the Web?
> >
> > Nigel said it would be possible to secure it a bit using GPG keys.
> > Maybe this kind of signing should be made a requirement.
>
> Well, should signing be necessary and/or sufficie
Nigel Tao wrote:
>>> You mean running untrusted code from the Web?
>> Nigel said it would be possible to secure it a bit using GPG keys.
>> Maybe this kind of signing should be made a requirement.
>
> Well, should signing be necessary and/or sufficient, and who makes
> that decision?
> ___
27 matches
Mail list logo
