Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Is this API appropriate for GTK+ and adaptable for use with Windows
and OS X?
OS X could use the bacon backend (that uses Unix domain sockets).
On Windows AF_UNIX is not available, but Windows has named pipes that
are more similar to sockets than to Unix named pipes.
Hi;
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 13:47 +0200, Marco Barisione wrote:
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Windows AF_UNIX is not available, but Windows has named pipes that
are more similar to sockets than to Unix named pipes. However only the
client part of named pipes is supported on Windows 9x/Me.
Hi, list
As an alternative to GUnique, you could do the kind of thing Maemo does
just by using D-Bus.
http://live.gnome.org/DesktopAppsAsDBusServices
(Crappy write-up, but I just haven't had time to sort it out. Sorry!)
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 16:07 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Hi;
On Sun,
On 9/24/06, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, list
As an alternative to GUnique, you could do the kind of thing Maemo does
just by using D-Bus.
If just by using D-Bus means what I think it does, then all desktop
apps doing so are broken. You need to handle startup-notification too
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 09:43 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 9/24/06, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, list
As an alternative to GUnique, you could do the kind of thing Maemo does
just by using D-Bus.
If just by using D-Bus means what I think it does, then all desktop
apps doing
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 09:43 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
(Crappy write-up, but I just haven't had time to sort it out. Sorry!)
GUnique already uses D-Bus (with bacon as a backup). So, how is your
proposal different than GUnique? (Other than startup-notification not
being mentioned in your
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 09:13 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 09:43 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
(Crappy write-up, but I just haven't had time to sort it out. Sorry!)
GUnique already uses D-Bus (with bacon as a backup). So, how is your
proposal different than GUnique?
Dom, 2006-09-24 às 16:57 +0100, Alex Jones escreveu:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 09:43 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
GUnique already uses D-Bus (with bacon as a backup). So, how is your
proposal different than GUnique? (Other than startup-notification not
being mentioned in your proposal yet?)
Elijah Newren wrote:
http://live.gnome.org/DesktopAppsAsDBusServices
(Crappy write-up, but I just haven't had time to sort it out. Sorry!)
GUnique already uses D-Bus (with bacon as a backup). So, how is your
proposal different than GUnique? (Other than startup-notification not
being
(Crap, *sends to list this time round*)
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 23:28 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Dom, 2006-09-24 às 16:57 +0100, Alex Jones escreveu:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 09:43 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
GUnique already uses D-Bus (with bacon as a backup). So, how is your
On 9/24/06, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 09:13 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Is extensible compatible with hiding the gory details of start-up
notification timestamps? I don't know. I don't have a good sense
of what a prototypical D-Bus exporting application looks
On 9/24/06, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is exactly the situation BMPx is in, too.
It has pretty cool effects for, say, file managers, too. Consider that
gnomevfs.show_uri had the support to read a D-Bus bus-name and object
path from a .desktop file for an application, and instead
On 9/24/06, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I guess either way, you have essentially zero chance of getting
this right without using libstartup-notification ... which might be the
bigger picture point.
Actually as long as you aren't forking/execing a new process,
13 matches
Mail list logo
