On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:51 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Ritesh Khadgaray wrote:
> >
> > Tried metacity compositor. affects look cleaner than compiz except for
> > one small thing : all windows look blue :(
> >
>
> I don't think there's any expectation that the current code in CVS is
> w
Ritesh Khadgaray wrote:
>
> Tried metacity compositor. affects look cleaner than compiz except for
> one small thing : all windows look blue :(
>
I don't think there's any expectation that the current code in CVS is
working, though I could be wrong.
Havoc
Op dinsdag 10-10-2006 om 11:29 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Josselin
Mouette:
> As Epiphany extensions are tightly dependent on the Epiphany version, I
> don't think it would be very useful.
Tighly dependent? What makes you think so?
Not all recent extension may be compatible with earlier Epipha
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 15:33 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> > On 10/4/06, Rob Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The effort required to add eye candy effects to metacity is much
> >> smaller, in my opinion, than the effort required to make compiz a good,
> >> usable win
Johan Dahlin wrote:
> Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>
>>Vincent Untz wrote:
>>
>>>Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>>>
>>>
to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
on that ?
>>>
>>>Straight question: if we integrate an interfac
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> On 10/4/06, Rob Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The effort required to add eye candy effects to metacity is much
>> smaller, in my opinion, than the effort required to make compiz a good,
>> usable window manager. Most of the effects code is likely to be
>> reusable in
On 10/4/06, Rob Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The effort required to add eye candy effects to metacity is much
> smaller, in my opinion, than the effort required to make compiz a good,
> usable window manager. Most of the effects code is likely to be
> reusable in metacity and KWin; compiz ma
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>> to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
>> on that ?
>
> Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
> can we choose between glade, gazpacho and s
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> Vincent Untz wrote:
>> Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>>
>>> to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
>>> on that ?
>> Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
>> can we cho
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>
>>to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
>>on that ?
>
> Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
> can we choose between glade, gazpacho and
Vincent Untz wrote:
[...]
>>As there is currently no developer tools suite - I am also requesting
>>that one be created - I've spoken to Richard (devhelp) and Naba (anjuta)
>>and they will be willing to be a part of such a release suite - others too
>>have expressed thier interest by adding thier m
On 10/10/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As there is currently no developer tools suite - I am also requesting
> > that one be created - I've spoken to Richard (devhelp) and Naba (anjuta)
> > and they will be willing to be a part of such a release suite - others too
> > have express
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>> to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
>> on that ?
>
> Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
> can we choose between glade, gazpacho and s
On 10/10/06, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Would session management be a good place to put something like
> application hibernation?
I'd think it should be possible to save the application state in
general, not necessarily only in terms of hibernation.
If only one could trigger the s
Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
> to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
> on that ?
Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
can we choose between glade, gazpacho and stetic?
Vincent
--
Les gens
Hi Tristan,
(cc'ing d-d-l since this needs to be a community decision)
Le samedi 07 octobre 2006, à 11:06, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
> Hello release team,
>
> I would like to formally propose that glade be included in
> a gnome developer tools release suite, I think we can all benefit
> f
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:04 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> So, anything else? Where do we start from to solve all this?
I wanted to talk about this at the summit, but failed.
Would session management be a good place to put something like
application hibernation? For example when a system is runnin
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:09:37AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hopefully we'll get some of the patches languishing in bugzilla into
> HEAD soon. I'd list which ones I'm hoping to get in, including the one I
> was just looking at (#333752), but bugzilla has chosen this exact
> instant to b
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> * Call it libgtkdesktop and include in GTK source? Or in GTK proper?
> This makes sense for some of the stuff, like:
> * screensaver (see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305688).
> This could be merged with Dan's work on Gtk/GdkSession, and we could add
> there
[damned gmail web ui]
> So, anything else?
network state; right now, every networked application must link
against libnm-glib in order to know whether we have an active
connection or not. libnm-glib doesn't have bindings so other
languages (python, perl, c#) must query the D-Bus interface direct
Hi
After a few days left for the discussion to die, here's a summary of
what has been said in that long thread, and my conclusions, hopefully
the next step, if we all agree, is to start working on them:
* Gdk/GtkSession as a replacement for GnomeClient. I think we all agree
on this, and Dan is wo
Hi!
I released a new version that already contains some of the suggestions
made here:
* Support for GnuPG signatures (the XML file must contain an element
http://www.example.com/path/to/myfile.tar.gz.sig).
The public key will be automatically imported from a key server,
* XML element version now
Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 10:49 +0200, Reinout van Schouwen a écrit :
> In the specific case of Epiphany-extensions, it's a great advantage that
> Epiphany users who are locked into a certain older distro for whatever
> reason, can benefit from new features that are shipped with newer
> Epiphany r
Op za, 07-10-2006 te 20:45 +0200, schreef Chipzz:
> And those still should be updated by the distribution (in case they came
> with the distribution in the first place).
I disagree.
In the specific case of Epiphany-extensions, it's a great advantage that
Epiphany users who are locked into a certa
Hi,
vino has branched - 2.16 stuff on the gnome-2-16 branch.
Hopefully we'll get some of the patches languishing in bugzilla into
HEAD soon. I'd list which ones I'm hoping to get in, including the one I
was just looking at (#333752), but bugzilla has chosen this exact
instant to ba
25 matches
Mail list logo
