Re: Potential need for librsvg API breakage

2006-11-01 Thread Dominic Lachowicz
Hi Tim, > this is already broken and has to be fixed. > if you want to be able to unload a type implementaiton, you MUST > use g_type_register_dynamic. > using g_type_register_static and unloading its implementaiton is as > good as dlopen(); atexit(dlsym()); dlclose(); > the alternative is of cour

Re: Potential need for librsvg API breakage

2006-11-01 Thread Tim Janik
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Dominic Lachowicz wrote: > Hi, > > So I'm currently faced with a dilemma that's hitting a lot of users, > causing their applications to crash and otherwise behave badly. I'd > appreciate if people might offer any insight they had on the issue. > > In the 2.16.x series, librsvg'

Potential need for librsvg API breakage

2006-11-01 Thread Dominic Lachowicz
Hi, So I'm currently faced with a dilemma that's hitting a lot of users, causing their applications to crash and otherwise behave badly. I'd appreciate if people might offer any insight they had on the issue. In the 2.16.x series, librsvg's fundamental "type", the RsvgHandle, became a subclass of

Re: "Document font" preference

2006-11-01 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2006-11-01 klockan 19:26 skrev Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro: > In my font preferences I see a "Document font" option. It affects the > gconf key /desktop/gnome/interface/document_font_name, which is > documented as "Name of the default font used for reading documents". > However, changing this font

Re: "Document font" preference

2006-11-01 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 18:33 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > On Qua, 2006-11-01 at 18:26 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > > In my font preferences I see a "Document font" option. It affects the > > gconf key /desktop/gnome/interface/document_font_name, which is > > documented a

Re: gnome-menus branched for 2.16

2006-11-01 Thread Travis Watkins
On 11/1/06, Joachim Noreiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a list anywhere of what all these modules are > and what they each do? > Just searched for 'gnome-menus' on the wiki but I've > not come out any more informed. > gnome-menus is the library that powers the menu bar and alacarte. It's

Re: "Document font" preference

2006-11-01 Thread Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
On Qua, 2006-11-01 at 18:26 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > In my font preferences I see a "Document font" option. It affects the > gconf key /desktop/gnome/interface/document_font_name, which is > documented as "Name of the default font used for reading documents". > However, changing

"Document font" preference

2006-11-01 Thread Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
In my font preferences I see a "Document font" option. It affects the gconf key /desktop/gnome/interface/document_font_name, which is documented as "Name of the default font used for reading documents". However, changing this font seems to have no effect on any GNOME application. Two question

gnome-menus branched for 2.16

2006-11-01 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hi, gnome-menus has branched - 2.16 stuff on the gnome-2-16 branch. Cheers, Mark. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Proposal to enable accessibility by default for GNOME development releases

2006-11-01 Thread David Bolter
Willie Walker wrote: > OK - I'll answer my own question - this approach doesn't seem to do what > we want. In testing and testing with this, the problem is that some > assistive technologies depend upon the existence and value of the key > itself: if it's not enabled, they let the user know and th

Re: Proposal to enable accessibility by default for GNOME development releases

2006-11-01 Thread Fernando Herrera
On 11/1/06, Willie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So It seems as though the right thing to do is enable accessibility in the default schema for development releases. Anyone have a clue for how to do this? We can use a autoconf variable on the schema file and expand it depending on min

Re: Proposal to enable accessibility by default for GNOME development releases

2006-11-01 Thread Willie Walker
OK - I'll answer my own question - this approach doesn't seem to do what we want. In testing and testing with this, the problem is that some assistive technologies depend upon the existence and value of the key itself: if it's not enabled, they let the user know and then enable it. I embarassingly