В Втр, 12/12/2006 в 13:24 +0800, Cloudor Pu пишет:
> Hi, all
>
> In my attached example.c, gtk_socket_add_id() is used to embed another
> existed xwindow into a GtkSocket. It works in fvwm or blackbox but
> failed in GNOME.
>
> Can anybody tell me why this could happen? It's funny. Shouldn't gn
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 13:44 -0600, tom lamm wrote:
> Gnome has begun auto-starting more and more programs. Every morning when
> I fire up the laptop, 3, then 5, now 8 various applications are
> auto-started when the desktop loads.
>
> I am very careful to have everything closed before I logout. I
> Reducing the number of capplets is still a laudable goal, but hasn't
> solved this problem in the past.
Actually, it has. But recently, no one has taken the challenge to do a big
review and refactor (PreferencesRevisited on the wiki). So while it has been
raised, it has not been done, but that
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I'm not saying this is easy, especially for those coming from different
> modules, but this would reduce the current number from 24 to 12. Which
> is quite an acceptable number.
>
Hear hear!
also remember that frequently settings can be moved to
context-appropriate loc
Le mardi 12 décembre 2006 à 17:33 +, Thomas Wood a écrit :
> > But even if we can't get away from a multitude of capplets, there's an
> > alternative solution: add an extra level of preferences "categories", as
> > we do for the applications menu.
>
> Four clicks to get to a preference windo
Gnome has begun auto-starting more and more programs. Every morning when
I fire up the laptop, 3, then 5, now 8 various applications are
auto-started when the desktop loads.
I am very careful to have everything closed before I logout. I do not
know if it is still the case, but am aware that in the
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 12:57 -0500, Jon Nettleton wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 17:33 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > I do think using a shell window is easier than a menu, especially when
> > it has search and filter features. It is also likely to be more familiar
> > to users coming from oth
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 16:40 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> > A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful.
>
> Too menu preferences items is painful whether it's in a menu or a
> "shell" window. I doubt that this new UI helps much with that
Jon Nettleton wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 17:33 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
>> Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
>>> On Ter, 2006-12-12 at 11:51 -0500, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful. Oft
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 17:33 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
> Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> > On Ter, 2006-12-12 at 11:51 -0500, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> >>
> >>> A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful. Often, Gnome properties
> >
On Ter, 2006-12-12 at 17:31 +, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> >
> >> A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful. Often, Gnome properties
> >> menu is about 20 entry when you install some additionnal softwares.
Hi,
We released Glade 3.0.3 this morning with some final bugfixes and
some updated and new translations, we dont plan on making any more
releases in 3.0, so I'm closing the glade3-3-0-branch from development
(I guess if people really wanted some kind of crucial bugfix that we
missed, it would wa
Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
>
>> A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful. Often, Gnome properties
>> menu is about 20 entry when you install some additionnal softwares.
>> Gnome is the only desktop which keep using this outdated
>> "co
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> On Ter, 2006-12-12 at 11:51 -0500, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
>> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
>>
>>> A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful. Often, Gnome properties
>>> menu is about 20 entry when you install some additionnal softwa
On 12/12/06, Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> The gnome-control-center hackers have been hard at work integrating the
> work done at Novell into making a nice shiny new shell for the control
> center. This time it is very much more usable, and we would like to
> propose
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 11:51 -0500, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
>
> > A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful. Often, Gnome properties
> > menu is about 20 entry when you install some additionnal softwares.
> > Gnome is the only desktop w
On Ter, 2006-12-12 at 11:51 -0500, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
>
> > A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful. Often, Gnome properties
> > menu is about 20 entry when you install some additionnal softwares.
> > Gnome is the only desktop w
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful. Often, Gnome properties
> menu is about 20 entry when you install some additionnal softwares.
> Gnome is the only desktop which keep using this outdated
> "control-center". A control center is f
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:26 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful.
Too menu preferences items is painful whether it's in a menu or a
"shell" window. I doubt that this new UI helps much with that, though I
haven't seen a screenshot. Combining control panels will
David Bolter wrote:
> If it is indeed "very much more usable", then you have my vote as long
> "usable" includes "accessible".
> http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/
By usable I nearly meant "has enough features to be useful".
Accessibility and usability audits would, of course, be a prereq
Ross Burton wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 11:18 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
>> The gnome-control-center hackers have been hard at work integrating the
>> work done at Novell into making a nice shiny new shell for the control
>> center. This time it is very much more usable, and we would like to
>
Hi,
I really wanted this feature for some months. Thanks for that job ! Also
some screenshots would be cool.
> Are there any use cases as to why this is better than the menus?
A menu longer that 10 entry is very painful. Often, Gnome properties
menu is about 20 entry when you install some additi
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 11:18 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
> The gnome-control-center hackers have been hard at work integrating the
> work done at Novell into making a nice shiny new shell for the control
> center. This time it is very much more usable, and we would like to
> propose that we replace
If it is indeed "very much more usable", then you have my vote as long
"usable" includes "accessible".
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/
cheers,
David Bolter
Thomas Wood wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> The gnome-control-center hackers have been hard at work integrating the
> work done at N
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 11:18 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> The gnome-control-center hackers have been hard at work integrating the
> work done at Novell into making a nice shiny new shell for the control
> center. This time it is very much more usable, and we would like to
> pr
Dear Community,
The gnome-control-center hackers have been hard at work integrating the
work done at Novell into making a nice shiny new shell for the control
center. This time it is very much more usable, and we would like to
propose that we replace the Preferences and Administration menus in
26 matches
Mail list logo
