Re: [announce] gnome-proxy

2007-01-18 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 23:05 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > I'd like to announce a proof-of-concept I've been working on and > hopefully get some feedback/help moving forward. > > gnome-proxy (http://code.google.com/p/gnome-proxy/) is a replacement for > gnome-network-preferences with the follo

GNOME 2.16.3 Showstopper Review

2007-01-18 Thread Andre Klapper
hi. GNOME 2.16.3 will be released at the end of the month, and 2.18 is not that far away. time to get the worst crashers and users' problems fixed - please take a look at this list. we also would like volunteers to write up future reports, please take a look at http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/Show

Re: [announce] gnome-proxy

2007-01-18 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:22 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 23:05 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > I'd like to announce a proof-of-concept I've been working on and > > hopefully get some feedback/help moving forward. > > > > gnome-proxy (http://code.google.com/p/gnome-p

Re: [announce] gnome-proxy

2007-01-18 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 07:37 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > For the "no proxy configured" or the "manual proxy configured" cases, we > would want the app to cache the results. getProxy() could return a > boolean "cacheable" field. If set to true, the app will not call > getProxy() again until

Re: [announce] gnome-proxy

2007-01-18 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:54 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 07:37 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > > For the "no proxy configured" or the "manual proxy configured" cases, we > > would want the app to cache the results. getProxy() could return a > > boolean "cacheable"

Re: [announce] gnome-proxy

2007-01-18 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 09:02 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:54 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > I don't know exactly what kind of info we can figure out, but at the > > very least we should be able to handle the cases you mention above. > > direct/none == "always cac

Re: RTL support in Gnome

2007-01-18 Thread Owen Taylor
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 01:29 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 21:15 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > > > > And how would this differ significantly in practice from > > gtk-i18n-list? > > - Owen > > People can discuss issues in Evolution

CIA-2 SVN module commit messages in IRC

2007-01-18 Thread Martyn Russell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Today I looked into why the old CIA-1 bot we have in #gossip on GIMPNet IRC wasn't forwarding commit messages for the gossip project. For those that don't know what I am talking about, if you have a project in GNOME's Subversion, you can have you

[ANNOUNCE] Clutter 0.2.0

2007-01-18 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
good news everyone! after a tad more than six months, and much work in the SVN, Clutter 0.2.0 is finally out. grab it while it's still hot: http://www.clutter-project.org/sources/ http://www.clutter-project.org/sources/clutter/0.2/ while you're at it, have a look at the spiffy new web site:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Clutter 0.2.0

2007-01-18 Thread Elijah Newren
On 1/18/07, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > good news everyone! This looks awesome, congrats Emmanuele! However, as noted at http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list, announcements are probably better just sent to gnome-announce-list instead of desktop-devel-list. T

Re: CIA-2 SVN module commit messages in IRC

2007-01-18 Thread Olav Vitters
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:40:09PM +, Martyn Russell wrote: > This should help temporarily, but does anyone know who maintains GNOME's > client scripts so we can fix this? For future reference, the GNOME sysadmins, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (when urgent), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ticketing system) or gnome-

Re: CIA-2 SVN module commit messages in IRC

2007-01-18 Thread Martyn Russell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Olav Vitters wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:40:09PM +, Martyn Russell wrote: >> This should help temporarily, but does anyone know who maintains GNOME's >> client scripts so we can fix this? > > For future reference, the GNOME sysadmins, [EMA