Hi list
(Disclaimer: I'm completely clueless, so all of this may well be
bullshit - put me right!)
I've noticed that more and more apps are departing from stock styling
and implementing some more "adventurous" visual appearances,
particularly when it comes to tree views. See the new tree view in
On 2/28/07, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 14:38 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> >
> > "This page can be updated at any time by the release-team. Others not
> > in the release team can update the micro version number of modules if
> > (a) they introduce no other ne
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 23:23 +0100, guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 17:04 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > Updating jhbuild has been easy enough, but I have no idea about GARNOME.
> > Can't the people responsible for those two just subscribe to the wiki
> > and get notified automatically?
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 17:04 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 14:38 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
[...]
> > (c)
> > the person who does the updates ensures that jhbuild and GARNOME are
> > either updated or at least notified of the need to update. Please
> > update only the recomm
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 14:38 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> "This page can be updated at any time by the release-team. Others not
> in the release team can update the micro version number of modules if
> (a) they introduce no other new (or newer) external dependencies and
> (b) the module has comm
On 2/28/07, Frederic Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
> > Thought this is automatic. Anyway, please bump. 1.3.14 has been out
> > for a couple of weeks now...
No, it isn't. And we haven't yet created a process for fast-tracking
these either, though we seemed to have
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Thought this is automatic. Anyway, please bump. 1.3.14 has been out
> for a couple of weeks now...
Commited to jhbuild module set and updated external deps on live.g.o.
Don't hesitate to do such changes by yourself.
Regards,
Frederic
_
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 19:16 +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> --- Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 17:54 +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> > > --- Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > No, it isn't only a run-time dep, or at least
Thought this is automatic. Anyway, please bump. 1.3.14 has been out
for a couple of weeks now...
1.4.0 will be out really soon now. Blockers are being fixed at a rate
of 2 or 3 a day, and only 4 or 5 are remaining.
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to pu
Le mercredi 28 février 2007 à 19:16 +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski a
écrit :
> --- Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 17:54 +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> > > --- Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > No, it isn't only a run-time dep, o
--- Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 17:54 +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> > --- Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > No, it isn't only a run-time dep, or at least shouldn't be. The
> > > gnome-mime-data doesn't have to be in the same place
On 2/28/07, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can do all sorts of shit manually if you want. That doesn't change a
> single thing. We enforce backwards compatibility.
An excellent way to drive people away. Well done.
Abel
--
Abel Cheung (GPG Key: 0xC67186FF)
Key fingerprint:
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:30 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 17:54 +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> > You can safely remove PKG check from configure and build g-vfs without
> > smallest problems. You can even run all major GNOME apps without it.
> > Forcing people to us
Alexander Larsson píše v St 28. 02. 2007 v 09:30 +0100:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 17:54 +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> > --- Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > No, it isn't only a run-time dep, or at least shouldn't be. The
> > > gnome-mime-data doesn't have to be in the same
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 17:54 +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> --- Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, it isn't only a run-time dep, or at least shouldn't be. The
> > gnome-mime-data doesn't have to be in the same place as the libraries
> > you're installing, and gnome-vfs should
15 matches
Mail list logo
