Hi,
I recently discovered that Application isn't a valid category in the
desktop specification, despite being used in most desktop files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/share/applications
$ grep Categories *.desktop | grep Application | wc -l
84
Should there be a GnomeLove mission to clean up the
Hi,
This is a very nice and simple idea for Gnome Goals. Also, nice as a
GNOME Love activity. It's a pity the idea came after code freeze.
Cheers!
--lucasr
2007/3/6, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I recently discovered that Application isn't a valid category in the
desktop
Le mardi 06 mars 2007 à 11:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha a écrit :
Hi,
This is a very nice and simple idea for Gnome Goals. Also, nice as a
GNOME Love activity. It's a pity the idea came after code freeze.
.desktop aren't really code.
release team hat
I think we can accept those changes without
2007-03-06 klockan 10:13 skrev Lucas Rocha:
2007/3/6, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Should there be a GnomeLove mission to clean up the categories field in
every desktop file? Removing Application, adding GNOME, adding
OnlyShowIn as relevant, making sure as many categories are possible
GNOME should be able to update its dependency for cairo from cairo
1.3.16 to cairo 1.4.0, (1.3.16 was a release candidate for
1.4.0---there have not been any API changes between the two versions).
Thanks,
-Carl
pgpmIajqVSjx2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hei,
2007/3/6, Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le mardi 06 mars 2007 à 11:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha a écrit :
Hi,
This is a very nice and simple idea for Gnome Goals. Also, nice as a
GNOME Love activity. It's a pity the idea came after code freeze.
.desktop aren't really code.
I know.
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 08:58 +, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi,
I recently discovered that Application isn't a valid category in the
desktop specification, despite being used in most desktop files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/share/applications
$ grep Categories *.desktop | grep Application | wc -l
Le mardi 06 mars 2007, à 10:33, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Le mardi 06 mars 2007 à 11:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha a écrit :
Hi,
This is a very nice and simple idea for Gnome Goals. Also, nice as a
GNOME Love activity. It's a pity the idea came after code freeze.
.desktop aren't really code.
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 14:23 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 06 mars 2007, à 10:33, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Le mardi 06 mars 2007 à 11:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha a écrit :
Hi,
This is a very nice and simple idea for Gnome Goals. Also, nice as a
GNOME Love activity. It's a pity the
More generally you could validate all the files with
desktop-file-install (assuming its validation rules are still up-to-date)
Havoc
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Le mardi 06 mars 2007 à 10:05 -0500, Havoc Pennington a écrit :
More generally you could validate all the files with
desktop-file-install (assuming its validation rules are still up-to-date)
Well, Applications category is a little special in desktop-file-install
because it is outputting only a
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:04 -0300, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
I'm creating the page in the wiki. Will send it later for you guys to
review the wording and make sure the instructions are ok, before
publishing it.
Ok, I've added then a draft for this Goal here:
Le mardi 06 mars 2007 à 13:52 -0300, Claudio Saavedra a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:04 -0300, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
I'm creating the page in the wiki. Will send it later for you guys to
review the wording and make sure the instructions are ok, before
publishing it.
Ok, I've added
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Could you add, as suggest by Havoc, a call to desktop-file-validate so
people check they are generating valid .desktop file ?
Done.
Claudio
--
Claudio Saavedra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On 3/6/07, Carl Worth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GNOME should be able to update its dependency for cairo from cairo
1.3.16 to cairo 1.4.0, (1.3.16 was a release candidate for
1.4.0---there have not been any API changes between the two versions).
Awesome, great work. A few points will be
GARNOME SVN-trunk updated earlier today.
-Joseph
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:37 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 3/6/07, Carl Worth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GNOME should be able to update its dependency for cairo from cairo
1.3.16 to
Le mardi 06 mars 2007, à 15:20, Claudio Saavedra a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Could you add, as suggest by Havoc, a call to desktop-file-validate so
people check they are generating valid .desktop file ?
Done.
I've updated it it so that we also
As development for gnome 2.18 has frozen solid, we're obviously going
to have to branch out. so I did that.
translators, release-team and doc writers should know that the
2.18 branch can be found in the standard location:
svn.gnome.org/svn/glade3/branches/gnome-2-18
I've already requested a
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:37 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 3/6/07, Carl Worth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GNOME should be able to update its dependency for cairo from cairo
1.3.16 to cairo 1.4.0, (1.3.16 was a release candidate for
1.4.0---there have not been any API changes between the two
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:37:07 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
Awesome, great work. A few points will be deducted from your score
for being just over a month behind your original schedule and running
so close to the GNOME 2.18.0 deadline, thus making me worry that you
might not be getting a release
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 20:38 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
I've updated it it so that we also add the GTK category, we verify the
other categories used in the .desktop file and we verify whether
OnlyShowIn
should be used or not.
Great, thank you!
Looks great for me. If there's no other
Hi Vincent,
I'm not in it. :-). Looking through the past few series and seeing
which more-than-once contributors are not in the list, I guess you'd
have to add (Including me):
Ronald S. Bultje
Sebastien Bacher
Tim-Philipp Muller - I don't know how to do a u-umlaut
Jens Granseuer
Wouter
On 3/6/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Do you all remember that we list our contributors in About GNOME? The
list of GNOME contributors is probably outdated: many people contributed
a lot of stuff in recent years and are not there. It's a shame to not
thank them, so we have to
Hi Vincent:
I've never been included in the Gnome contributors' list. I reckon it's
about time!
Bill Haneman
also
Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Di\xf3genes
Li Yuan
Harry Lu
David Bolter
Padraig O'Briain
and if Will doesn't send these himself:
Will Walker
Mike Pedersen
Thanks Vincent!
- Bill
Hi all [shame on lips],
I swear I thought that the reply-to was already set to Vincent, I'm
humbly sorry for spamming your inbox - and even more so with this
apology message. Please ignore me for the rest for the rest of the
week as punishment.
Ronald
On Mar 6, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Ronald S.
Sure and:
Rich Burridge
Joanmarie Diggs
Lynn Monsanto
Thanks!
Will
Bill Haneman wrote:
Hi Vincent:
I've never been included in the Gnome contributors' list. I reckon it's
about time!
Bill Haneman
also
Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Di\xf3genes
Li Yuan
Harry Lu
David Bolter
Padraig
Add: Joseph Sacco
-Joseph
--
joseph_sacco [at] comcast [dot] net
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:31 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
Do you all remember that we list our contributors in About GNOME? The
list of GNOME contributors is probably outdated: many people contributed
a lot of stuff in recent years and are not there. It's a shame to not
thank them, so we
--- Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I recently discovered that Application isn't a valid category in the
desktop specification, despite being used in most desktop files:
[...]
this should resolve:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129268 (closed as invalid)
Le mardi 06 mars 2007, à 17:31, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:31 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
It'd be great to have the non-ascii characters in hexa, so for example:
Mariano Su\xc3\xa1rez-Alvarez instead of Mariano Suárez-Alvarez.
Any reason for hex encoding? That's
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 17:31 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
snip
And maybe it's time to make it data instead of code?
I had the same comment:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415516
--
Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
desktop-devel-list
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 00:01 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 06 mars 2007, à 17:31, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:31 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
It'd be great to have the non-ascii characters in hexa, so for example:
Mariano Su\xc3\xa1rez-Alvarez instead of Mariano
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:01:28AM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 06 mars 2007, ? 17:31, Behdad Esfahbod a ?crit :
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:31 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
It'd be great to have the non-ascii characters in hexa, so for example:
Mariano Su\xc3\xa1rez-Alvarez instead of
On 3/6/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonus points for making it take less than, ya know, about a million
hours to go through the whole list :)
Yeah, one-by-one alphabetical order doesn't sound very friendly.
/me remembers the old Win95 contributors easter egg...
An older
34 matches
Mail list logo
