I've branched libsoup for gnome-2-18. You know the drill. (Not cc:ing
docs or i18n lists because libsoup has neither.)
Plans for 2.20? Well, maybe I'll finally do the long-awaited ABI break I
originally claimed I was going to do for 2.14.[1] Or maybe not.
People who are using libsoup (or who *wan
2007/3/12, Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 21:12 +0100, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
> If I'm allowed to make a suggestion for a general roadmap item for
> 2.20 which spans multiple modules it would be "desktop wide search"
>
> Currently the GNOME 2.18 desktop contains two search
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 21:12 +0100, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
> If I'm allowed to make a suggestion for a general roadmap item for
> 2.20 which spans multiple modules it would be "desktop wide search"
>
> Currently the GNOME 2.18 desktop contains two search front ends
> 1. gnome search tool
> 2. search i
If I'm allowed to make a suggestion for a general roadmap item for
2.20 which spans multiple modules it would be "desktop wide search"
Currently the GNOME 2.18 desktop contains two search front ends
1. gnome search tool
2. search in nautilus
Then there are "two search engines" (actually there are
gnome-icon-theme is now branched for 2.18.
Fighting the fight for better icons on the desktop,
-- dobey
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
This link may be enlightening:
http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.4/
-Joseph
==
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 18:02 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> I'd like to suggest updating jhbuild to install Python 2.
I'd like to suggest updating jhbuild to install Python 2.5 instead of
2.4 for GNOME 2.20, because:
* I don't think Python 2.4 will continue to be maintained;
* Distributions that will receive GNOME 2.20 will most likely make
python 2.5 the default (ubuntu already does for GNOME 2.18);
* We
On 3/12/07, Rich Burridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Elijah,
>
> >> I've just branched gcalctool (v5.9.14) for GNOME 2.18
> >
> > Is there any chance we could we get you to make the minor version
> > number for gcalctool match that of GNOME's (e.g. 5.19.x for the next
> > unstable cycle)?
>
>
Hi Elijah,
>> I've just branched gcalctool (v5.9.14) for GNOME 2.18
>
> Is there any chance we could we get you to make the minor version
> number for gcalctool match that of GNOME's (e.g. 5.19.x for the next
> unstable cycle)?
Yes. It's funny you should mention that. It's worked so well for Orca
Hi Rich,
On 3/12/07, Rich Burridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've just branched gcalctool (v5.9.14) for GNOME 2.18
Is there any chance we could we get you to make the minor version
number for gcalctool match that of GNOME's (e.g. 5.19.x for the next
unstable cycle)?
Thanks,
Elijah
_
I've just branched gcalctool (v5.9.14) for GNOME 2.18
svn cp svn+ssh://svn.gnome.org/svn/gcalctool/trunk
svn+ssh://svn.gnome.org/svn/gcalctool/branches/gnome-2-18
Committed revision 1553.
New development, bug fixing etc will go on in SVN trunk/HEAD.
I don't have plans to do much with gcalctool
Hi,
I branched gail, atk, at-spi, libgail-gnome for gnome-2-18. The develop
work will continue on trunk.
The plans for 2.19 are:
* implement collection in at-spi
* support multi-threads applications better
* fix some important gailtreeview bugs
Best Regards,
Li
_
Hi!,
As promised, I've recently made a stable release of
system-tools-backends (2.2.0) in time for 2.18, I encourage that GNOME
2.18 recommends this one.
Regards,
Carlos
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gn
13 matches
Mail list logo
